Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Boldly going where firms have gone before? Understanding the evolution of supplier codes of conduct

Boldly going where firms have gone before? Understanding the evolution of supplier codes of conduct Supplier codes of conduct (CoC) are the primary mechanism companies use to drive corporate social responsibility (CSR) upstream in their supply chains. Companies have traditionally used CoC to tackle systemic social issues (e.g. forced labor, wages and working conditions). More recently, CoC have included environmental concerns (e.g. waste treatment, toxic chemicals and pollution). The purpose of this paper is to analyze how companies have evolved their CoC across four points in time between 1999 and 2017. By evaluating changes in the scope, depth and possible regime of sanctions included in CoC, the authors consider whether companies use CoC as either a leveling or a differentiating mechanism.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employ a competing-theories approach to examine how companies have employed CoC. Specifically, the authors examine the content of CoC between four data points: 1999, 2005, 2010 and 2017 to determine whether CoC are used to maintain comparative parity (institutional theory) or to achieve a distinctive market presence (awareness–motivation–capability (AMC) framework). The sample includes 36 transnational companies. To enable replication, the authors maintained consistent sampling and coding procedures across the four time periods.FindingsThe authors find a significant harmonization and standardization of CoC over time. Alignment occurs at the lower end of acceptable norms – i.e. a lowest-common-denominator approach. Companies have not chosen to take a more aspirational approach that involves raising the bar on social and environmental performance. That is, companies have not attempted to use CoC to differentiate themselves as CSR standard bearers. Provision specificity dropped for the 2010 sample before rebounding in 2017.Originality/valueThe authors juxtapose the findings with a theoretical framework based on the tenets of institutional theory and the AMC framework. The authors conclude that changes in CoC are largely driven by coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as opposed to attempts to leverage CoC to create a distinctive image that could be used for competitive advantage. This finding provides context for how the public, investors and managers should view these documents. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Logistics Management Emerald Publishing

Boldly going where firms have gone before? Understanding the evolution of supplier codes of conduct

Download PDF
29 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/boldly-going-where-firms-have-gone-before-understanding-the-evolution-q1y0k7HMGT

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0957-4093
DOI
10.1108/ijlm-02-2018-0043
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Supplier codes of conduct (CoC) are the primary mechanism companies use to drive corporate social responsibility (CSR) upstream in their supply chains. Companies have traditionally used CoC to tackle systemic social issues (e.g. forced labor, wages and working conditions). More recently, CoC have included environmental concerns (e.g. waste treatment, toxic chemicals and pollution). The purpose of this paper is to analyze how companies have evolved their CoC across four points in time between 1999 and 2017. By evaluating changes in the scope, depth and possible regime of sanctions included in CoC, the authors consider whether companies use CoC as either a leveling or a differentiating mechanism.Design/methodology/approachThe authors employ a competing-theories approach to examine how companies have employed CoC. Specifically, the authors examine the content of CoC between four data points: 1999, 2005, 2010 and 2017 to determine whether CoC are used to maintain comparative parity (institutional theory) or to achieve a distinctive market presence (awareness–motivation–capability (AMC) framework). The sample includes 36 transnational companies. To enable replication, the authors maintained consistent sampling and coding procedures across the four time periods.FindingsThe authors find a significant harmonization and standardization of CoC over time. Alignment occurs at the lower end of acceptable norms – i.e. a lowest-common-denominator approach. Companies have not chosen to take a more aspirational approach that involves raising the bar on social and environmental performance. That is, companies have not attempted to use CoC to differentiate themselves as CSR standard bearers. Provision specificity dropped for the 2010 sample before rebounding in 2017.Originality/valueThe authors juxtapose the findings with a theoretical framework based on the tenets of institutional theory and the AMC framework. The authors conclude that changes in CoC are largely driven by coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as opposed to attempts to leverage CoC to create a distinctive image that could be used for competitive advantage. This finding provides context for how the public, investors and managers should view these documents.

Journal

The International Journal of Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 10, 2019

Keywords: Sustainability; North America; Europe; Asia; Buyer–supplier relationships; Supplier management; Mixed method; Sourcing and supply

References

  • Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective
    Aerts, W.; Cormier, D.; Magnan, M.
  • Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country
    Amran, A.; Haniffa, R.
  • Social and environmental performance at SMEs: considering motivations, capabilities, and instrumentalism
    Arend, R.J.
  • Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility
    Arya, B.; Salk, J.E.
  • Inside nike’s struggle to balance cost and worker safety in Bangladesh
    Banjo, S.
  • Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: a cognitive view
    Barnett, M.L.
  • Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future
    Barreto, I.
  • Putting their money where their mouths are: consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products
    Batte, M.T.; Hooker, N.H.; Haab, T.C.; Beaverson, J.
  • Dynamics of dyadic competitive interaction
    Baum, J.A.C.; Korn, H.J.
  • Where do we go from here? Progressing sustainability implementation efforts across supply chains
    Brockhaus, S.; Kersten, W.; Knemeyer, A.M.
  • Motivations for environmental and social consciousness: reevaluating the sustainability-based view
    Brockhaus, S.; Fawcett, S.E.; Knemeyer, A.M.; Fawcett, A.M.
  • Creating and sustaining ethical capability in the multi-national corporation
    Buller, P.F.; McEvoy, G.M.
  • Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective
    Buysse, K.; Verbeke, A.
  • Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility
    Campbell, J.L.
  • Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions
    Carter, C.R.; Easton, P.L.
  • Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements
    Chen, I.J.; Paulraj, A.
  • Competitive tension: the awareness-motivation-capability perspective
    Chen, M.; Su, K.-H.; Tsai, W.
  • Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration
    Chen, M.-J.
  • Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform
    Chen, M.-J.; Miller, D.
  • Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: baseline data and future research directions
    Christensen, L.J.; Peirce, E.; Hartman, L.P.; Hoffman, W.M.; Carrier, J.
  • Does coercion drive firms to adopt ‘voluntary’ green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives
    Clemens, B.; Douglas, T.J.
  • Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management
    Closs, D.J.; Speier, C.; Meacham, N.
  • Toward a ‘theoretical toolbox’ for sustainability research in marketing
    Connelly, B.L.; Ketchen, D.J.; Slater, S.F.
  • The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
    DiMaggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W.
  • Do codes of conduct improve worker rights in supply chains? A study of fair wear foundation
    Egels-Zandén, N.; Lindholm, H.
  • Dynamic capabilities: what are they?
    Eisenhardt, K.M.; Martin, J.A.
  • The apparel industry response to ‘sweatshop’ concerns: a review and analysis of codes of conduct
    Emmelhainz, M.A.; Adams, R.J.
  • Corporate codes of conduct: the effects of code content and quality on ethical performance
    Erwin, P.M.
  • Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: a resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity
    Escobar, L.F.; Vredenburg, H.
  • Sustainability as strategy: caught in the luxury trap
    Fawcett, S.E.; Brockhaus, S.; Knemeyer, A.M.; Fawcett, A.M.
  • Navigating the competitive landscape: the drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness
    Ferrier, W.J.
  • Systematic risk volatility and corporate reputation: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis
    Figlewicz, R.E.; Szwajkowski, E.
  • Toward greater validation of supply chain management theory and concepts: the roles of research replication and meta-analysis
    Goldsby, T.J.; Autry, C.W.
  • Supply chain learning of sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: a resource orchestration perspective
    Gong, Y.; Jia, F.; Brown, S.; Koh, L.
  • Does corporate social responsibility put reputation at risk by inviting activist targeting? An empirical test among European SMEs
    Graafland, J.
  • Germany overcoming the heritage of corporatism, corporate social responsibility across Europe
    Habisch, A.; Wegner, M.
  • The UN global compact-accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013
    Hayward, R.; Lee, J.; Keeble, J.; McNamara, R.; Hall, C.; Cruise, S.
  • The establishment and enforcement of codes
    Healy, M.; Iles, J.
  • Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach
    Jennings, P.D.; Zandbergen, P.A.
  • Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness
    Krefting, L.
  • The AJ list: 17 great Yvon Chouinard quotes
    Leonard, B.
  • Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis
    Lins, K.V.; Servaes, H.; Tamayo, A.
  • Factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for low-carbon products: a simulation study in China
    Liu, Y.; Yang, D.; Xu, H.
  • Beyond corporate codes of conduct: work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers
    Locke, R.; Kochan, T.; Romis, M.; Qin, F.
  • Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability
    Lombard, M.; Snyder‐Duch, J.; Bracken, C.C.
  • How does the market value corporate sustainability performance?
    Lourenço, I.C.; Branco, M.C.; Curto, J.D.; Eugénio, T.
  • How Nike Shed its sweatshop image to dominate the shoe industry’
    Lutz, A.
  • Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice
    McNeill, L.; Moore, R.
  • Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective
    McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D.
  • On supply chains and reputation risk: tracking changes in supplier codes of conduct
    Magnan, G.M.; Fawcett, S.E.; Alcantar, T.N.; Henshaw, K.
  • Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports
    Martínez-Ferrero, J.; García-Sánchez, I.-M.
  • Toward a theory of multi-tier supply chain management
    Mena, C.; Humphries, A.; Choi, T.Y.
  • Authenticity and well-being in the workplace: a mediation model
    Ménard, J.; Brunet, L.
  • Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony
    Meyer, J.W.; Rowan, B.
  • Sustainability and governance: five years into the financial crisis
    Millen, J.; McGowan, B.
  • CSR as reputation insurance: primum non nocere
    Minor, D.; Morgan, J.
  • Sustainability-related risk management in buying logistics services: an exploratory cross-case analysis
    Multaharju, S.; Lintukangas, K.; Hallikas, J.; Kähkönen, A.-K.
  • How nike solved its sweatshop problem
    Nisen, M.
  • How Patagonia are revolutionising CSR & sustainability
    O’Donnell, J.
  • Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain
    Odriozola, M.D.; Baraibar-Diez, E.
  • A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions
    Oliver, R.L.
  • The footprint chronicals
  • Institutionalizing sustainability: an empirical study of corporate registration and commitment to the United Nations global compact guidelines
    Perez-Batres, L.A.; Miller, V.V.; Pisani, M.J.
  • Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct?
    Perez-Batres, L.A.; Doh, J.P.; Miller, V.V.; Pisani, M.J.
  • Dancing in the dark: challenges for product developers to improve and communicate product sustainability
    Petersen, M.; Brockhaus, S.
  • Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: beyond megacities
    Pojani, D.; Stead, D.
  • Sustainable business model adoption among s&p 500 firms: a longitudinal content analysis study
    Ritala, P.; Huotari, P.; Bocken, N.; Albareda, L.; Puumalainen, K.
  • Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
    Roberts, P.W.; Dowling, G.R.
  • Unraveling the food supply chain: strategic insights from China and the 2007 recalls*
    Roth, A.V.; Tsay, A.A.; Pullman, M.E.; Gray, J.V.
  • An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature
    Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lai, K.
  • Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: differentiating ethical motivations
    Schaltegger, S.; Burritt, R.
  • Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: a review
    Schäufele, I.; Hamm, U.
  • Supply chain management for sustainable products – insights from research applying mixed methodologies
    Seuring, S.
  • From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
    Seuring, S.; Müller, M.
  • Toward a comprehensive understanding of corporate reputation: concept, measurement and implications
    Shamma, H.M.
  • Sustainable solid waste management: an integrated approach for asian countries
    Shekdar, A.V.
  • Do corporate sustainable management activities improve customer satisfaction, word of mouth intention and repurchase intention? Empirical evidence from the shipping industry
    Shin, Y.; Thai, V.V.; Grewal, D.; Kim, Y.
  • Rana Plaza collapse aftermath: are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?
    Sinkovics, N.; Hoque, S.F.; Sinkovics, R.R.
  • The overselling of globalization
    Stiglitz, J.E.
  • Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability
    Strand, R.
  • Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review
    Tachizawa, E.M.; Wong, C.Y.
  • Outsourcing/offshoring insights: going beyond reshoring to rightshoring
    Tate, W.L.; Bals, L.
  • Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management
    Tate, W.L.; Ellram, L.M.; Kirchoff, J.F.
  • Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance
    Teece, D.J.
  • Corporate codes in the varieties of capitalism: how their enforcement depends on the differences among production regimes
    Teubner, G.
  • Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices
    Weaver, G.R.; TreviÑo, L.K.; Cochran, P.L.
  • Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: an examination of the equator principles
    Wright, C.; Rwabizambuga, A.
  • WTO 2017 press releases – trade recovery expected in 2017 and 2018, amid policy uncertainty – press/793
  • Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labor standards: a case study of reebok’s athletic footwear supplier factory in China
    Yu, X.