Benchmarking: an alternative to OFSTED – lessons for higher education

Benchmarking: an alternative to OFSTED – lessons for higher education Schools and colleges have been placed firmly in the marketplace and are adopting appropriate strategies. Companies facing severe competition have learned to look at the quality, both of product and process, of their competitors, giving rise to the growing practice of benchmarking. Schools and colleges are currently being judged by a mechanistic, outcomes‐based inspection method which could provide the only benchmark for most teachers. Argues for collaborative benchmarking where schools and colleges examine in particular the quality of their processes in a search for how value is really added to the students′ experience. Emphasizes the need for an alternative perception of schools to that represented by OFSTED and suggests that benchmarking could be an important, and subversive, alternative. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality Assurance in Education Emerald Publishing

Benchmarking: an alternative to OFSTED – lessons for higher education

Quality Assurance in Education, Volume 3 (1): 3 – Mar 1, 1995

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/benchmarking-an-alternative-to-ofsted-lessons-for-higher-education-CpHSfNAhfq
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0968-4883
DOI
10.1108/09684889510082417
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Schools and colleges have been placed firmly in the marketplace and are adopting appropriate strategies. Companies facing severe competition have learned to look at the quality, both of product and process, of their competitors, giving rise to the growing practice of benchmarking. Schools and colleges are currently being judged by a mechanistic, outcomes‐based inspection method which could provide the only benchmark for most teachers. Argues for collaborative benchmarking where schools and colleges examine in particular the quality of their processes in a search for how value is really added to the students′ experience. Emphasizes the need for an alternative perception of schools to that represented by OFSTED and suggests that benchmarking could be an important, and subversive, alternative.

Journal

Quality Assurance in EducationEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 1, 1995

Keywords: Benchmarking; Competition; Education; Strategy

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month