Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Finn, James Brown (1981)
Risks entailed in teenage intoxication as perceived by junior and senior high school studentsJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 10
Fiona Perman, N. Henley (2001)
Marketing the Anti-Drug Message: Source Credibility Varies by Use/Non-Use of Marijuana
Wayne Hall, J. Nelson (1996)
Correlates of the perceived health risks of marijuana use among Australian adults.Drug and alcohol review, 15 2
G. Munro, R. Midford (2000)
'Zero tolerance' and drug education in Australian SchoolsDrug and Alcohol Review, 20
L. Festinger (1957)
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
J. Andrews, R. Netemeyer, S. Durvasula (1991)
Effects of Consumption Frequency on Believability and Attitudes toward Alcohol Warning LabelsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 25
J. Joy, S. Watson, J. Benson (1999)
Marijuana and Medicine
J. Cooper, R. Fazio (1984)
A New Look at Dissonance TheoryAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17
H. Kassarjian, Joel Cohen (1965)
Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer BehaviorCalifornia Management Review, 8
Frederick Gibbons, Paul McGovern, Harry Lando (1991)
Relapse and risk perception among members of a smoking cessation clinic.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 10 1
S. Watson, J. Benson, J. Joy (1999)
Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base
E. Goddard, V. Higgins (2000)
Drug Use, Smoking and Drinking among Young Teenagers in 1999
This paper examines the believability of strong warnings about the negative consequences of drug use among young adults in Australia who have never tried, currently use, or have tried and rejected cannabis. It finds that the strong warnings about cannabis are generally believed by never‐triers. The same warnings are perceived by current users as only slightly believable. Surprisingly, but also consistent with cognitive dissonance, trier‐rejecters of cannabis are the most likely, more so even than never‐triers, to believe the warnings about cannabis. The paper also examines warnings about cocaine and heroin by cannabis usage status. Current users of cannabis, compared with non‐users, perceive the warnings about the harmful effects of cocaine as less believable, suggesting possible “gateway” susceptibility to trial of this drug. But for heroin, all groups perceive the warnings very believable. The beliefs about particular negative consequences that are most likely to lead to discontinuation of use of cannabis, and those that should discourage uptake of cocaine and heroin, are identified.
Health Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Keywords: Drug addiction; Health education
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.