Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Behavioral biases in pension fund trustees’ decision making

Behavioral biases in pension fund trustees’ decision making Behavioral finance research has almost exclusively investigated the decision making of lay individuals, mostly ignoring more sophisticated institutional investors. The purpose of this paper is to better understand the relatively unexplored field of investment decisions made by pension fund trustees, an important subset of institutional investors, and identify future avenues of further exploration.Design/methodology/approachThis paper starts by setting out the landscape in which pension fund trustees operate and make their decisions, followed by a literature review of the extant behavioral finance research applicable to similar situations.FindingsDespite receiving training and accumulating experience in financial markets, these are limited and sparse; therefore, pension fund trustees are unlikely to be immune from behavioral biases. Trustees make decisions in groups, are heavily reliant on advice and make decisions on behalf of others. Research in those areas has uncovered many inefficiencies. It is still unknown how this specific context can affect the psychological effects on their decisions.Research limitations/implicationsGiven how much influence trustees’ decisions have on asset allocation and by extension in financial markets, this is a surprising state of affairs. Research in behavioral finance has had a marked influence on policy in the past and so we anticipate that exploring the decisions made within pension funds may have wide ramifications for the industry.Originality/valueAs far as the authors are aware, no behavioral research has empirically tested pension fund trustees’ decisions to investigate how the combination of group decisions, advice and surrogacy influence their decisions and, ultimately, the sustainability of our pensions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Review of Behavioral Finance Emerald Publishing

Behavioral biases in pension fund trustees’ decision making

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/behavioral-biases-in-pension-fund-trustees-decision-making-3TD0o0Bq2N
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1940-5979
DOI
10.1108/rbf-05-2018-0049
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Behavioral finance research has almost exclusively investigated the decision making of lay individuals, mostly ignoring more sophisticated institutional investors. The purpose of this paper is to better understand the relatively unexplored field of investment decisions made by pension fund trustees, an important subset of institutional investors, and identify future avenues of further exploration.Design/methodology/approachThis paper starts by setting out the landscape in which pension fund trustees operate and make their decisions, followed by a literature review of the extant behavioral finance research applicable to similar situations.FindingsDespite receiving training and accumulating experience in financial markets, these are limited and sparse; therefore, pension fund trustees are unlikely to be immune from behavioral biases. Trustees make decisions in groups, are heavily reliant on advice and make decisions on behalf of others. Research in those areas has uncovered many inefficiencies. It is still unknown how this specific context can affect the psychological effects on their decisions.Research limitations/implicationsGiven how much influence trustees’ decisions have on asset allocation and by extension in financial markets, this is a surprising state of affairs. Research in behavioral finance has had a marked influence on policy in the past and so we anticipate that exploring the decisions made within pension funds may have wide ramifications for the industry.Originality/valueAs far as the authors are aware, no behavioral research has empirically tested pension fund trustees’ decisions to investigate how the combination of group decisions, advice and surrogacy influence their decisions and, ultimately, the sustainability of our pensions.

Journal

Review of Behavioral Finance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 24, 2019

Keywords: Decision making; Pensions; Biases; Trustees

References

  • Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives
    Alicke, M.D.
  • Deciding for others reduces loss aversion
    Andersson, O.; Holm, H.J.; Tyran, J.-R.; Wengström, E.
  • The psychology of sunk cost
    Arkes, H.R.; Blumer, C.
  • How real is overconfidence?
    Ayton, P.; McClelland, A.
  • Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock investment performance of individual investors
    Barber, B.M.; Odean, T.
  • Risk taking in relationships: differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend
    Beisswanger, A.H.; Stone, E.R.; Hupp, J.M.; Allgaier, L.
  • Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans
    Benartzi, S.; Thaler, R.H.
  • Advice taking and decision-making: an integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
    Bonaccio, S.; Dalal, R.S.
  • The role of pension scheme trustees
    Bunt, K.; Winterbotham, M.; Williams, R.
  • Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach
    Camerer, C.F.; Lovallo, D.
  • The limits of anchoring
    Chapman, G.B.; Johnson, E.J.
  • Costs, fees and trustee decision-making
    Clacher, I.; McNair, S.; Hodgett, R.E.
  • Mapping the trustee landscape
    Clacher, I.; McNair, S.; Hodgett, R.E.
  • Selecting fund managers and consultants – What do trustees look for?
    Clacher, I.; McNair, S.; Hodgett, R.E.
  • Processes affecting scores on ‘understanding of others’ and ‘assumed similarity’
    Cronbach, L.
  • The impact of group size and proportion of shared information on the exchange and intergration of information in groups
    Cruz, M.G.; Boster, F.J.; Rodríguez, J.I.
  • Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions
    Daniel, K.; Hirshleifer, D.; Subrahmanyam, A.
  • The determinants of the flow of funds of managed portfolios: mutual funds vs. pension funds
    Del Guercio, D.; Tkac, P.A.
  • Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle
    Diehl, M.; Stroebe, W.
  • Advance directives as acts of communication
    Ditto, P.H.; Danks, J.H.; Smucker, W.D.; Bookwala, J.; Coppola, K.M.; Dresser, R.; Fagerlin, A.; Gready, R.M.; Houts, R.M.; Lockhart, L.K.; Zyzanski, S.
  • Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment
    Epley, N.; Keysar, B.; Van Boven, L.; Gilovich, T.
  • Asset management in Europe
  • Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments
    Fagerlin, A.; Ditto, P.H.; Danks, J.H.; Houts, R.M.
  • Affect, empathy, and regressive mispredictions of others’ preferences under risk
    Faro, D.; Rottenstreich, Y.
  • Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets?
    Feng, L.; Seasholes, M.S.
  • Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making
    Fernandez-Duque, D.; Wifall, T.
  • Are two interviewers better than one?
    Fifić, M.; Gigerenzer, G.
  • Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making
    Garcia-Retamero, R.; Galesic, M.
  • Are professional traders too slow to realize their losses?
    Garvey, R.; Murphy, A.
  • Do we listen to advice just because we paid for it? The impact of advice cost on its use
    Gino, F.
  • Effects of task difficulty on use of advice
    Gino, F.; Moore, D.A.
  • Anxiety, advice, and the ability to discern: feeling anxious motivates individuals to seek and use advice
    Gino, F.; Brooks, A.W.; Schweitzer, M.E.
  • The normative context of advice as social support
    Goldsmith, D.J.; Fitch, K.
  • The role of physicians’ recommendations in medical treatment decisions
    Gurmankin, A.D.; Baron, J.; Hershey, J.C.; Ubel, P.A.
  • Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making
    Heath, C.; Gonzalez, R.
  • Group versus individual performance: are N+1 heads better than one?
    Hill, G.W.
  • Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization, and choice shifts
    Hinsz, V.B.; Davis, J.H.
  • Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: the pros and cons of projection
    Hoch, S.J.
  • A fundamental prediction error: self-other discrepancies in risk preference
    Hsee, C.K.; Weber, E.U.
  • Group polarization. A critical review and meta-analysis
    Isenberg, D.J.
  • Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk
    Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A.
  • Group performance and decision making
    Kerr, N.L.; Tindale, R.S.
  • Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
    Klayman, J.; Ha, Y.-W.
  • Contingent weighting in self-other decision making
    Kray, L.J.
  • Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that
    Kray, L.J.; Gonzalez, R.
  • Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to numbers problems
    Laughlin, P.R.; Bonner, B.L.; Miner, A.
  • Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts: its effectiveness and biases
    Lim, J.S.; O’Connor, M.
  • Out of control: visceral influences on behavior
    Loewenstein, G.
  • Risk as feelings
    Loewenstein, G.; Hsee, C.K.; Weber, E.U.; Welch, N.
  • Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis
    Lu, L.; Yuan, Y.C.; McLeod, P.L.
  • Group research
    McGrath, J.E.; Kravitz, D.A.
  • Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision
    Mannes, A.E.
  • Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review
    Marks, G.; Miller, N.
  • Influence of a values discussion on congruence between elderly women and their families on critical health care decisions
    Matheis-Kraft, C.; Roberto, K.A.
  • A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making
    Michaelsen, L.K.; Watson, W.E.; Black, R.H.; Lynch, M.
  • Do older adults know their spouses’ end-of-life treatment preferences?
    Moorman, S.M.; Hauser, R.M.; Carr, D.
  • The group as a polarizer of attitudes
    Moscovici, S.; Zavalloni, M.
  • The group polarization phenomenon
    Myers, D.G.; Lamm, H.
  • How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence
    Nosic, A.; Weber, M.
  • Mechanisms for enhancing the credibility of an adviser: prepayment and aligned incentives
    Patt, A.G.; Bowles, H.R.; Cash, D.W.
  • Perception of performance in group brainstorming: the illusion of group productivity
    Paulus, P.B.; Dzindolet, M.T.; Poletes, G.; Camacho, L.M.
  • Quality of decision making and group norms
    Postmes, T.; Spears, R.; Cihangir, S.
  • Pension scheme investment policies
    Pratten, C.; Satchell, S.
  • Spouse as health care proxy for dialysis patients: whose preferences matter?
    Pruchno, R.A.; Lemay, E.P.; Feild, L.; Levinsky, N.G.
  • Choice shifts in group discussion: an introductory review
    Pruitt, D.G.
  • Pushing away from representative advice: advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment
    Rader, C.A.; Soll, J.B.; Larrick, R.P.
  • Improving the accuracy of group judgment: a process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology
    Reagan-Cirincione, P.
  • Information sampling and confidence within groups and judge advisor systems
    Savadori, L.; Swol, L.M.V.; Sniezek, J.A.
  • No decision-maker is an island: integrating expert advice with information acquisition
    Schrah, G.E.; Dalal, R.S.; Sniezek, J.A.
  • The risky shift as a general choice shift
    Schroeder, H.E.
  • Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions?
    Seckler, A.B.; Meier, D.E.; Mulvihill, M.; Cammer Paris, B.E.
  • The accuracy of surrogate decision makers
    Shalowitz, D.I.; Garrett-Mayer, E.; Wendler, D.
  • Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors
    Shapira, Z.; Venezia, I.
  • Behavioralizing finance
    Shefrin, H.
  • Factors affecting treatment decisions for a life-threatening illness: the case of medical treatment of breast cancer
    Siminoff, L.A.; Fetting, J.H.
  • Groups under uncertainty: an examination of confidence in group decision making
    Sniezek, J.A.
  • Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making
    Sniezek, J.A.; Buckley, T.
  • Accuracy and confidence in group judgment
    Sniezek, J.A.; Henry, R.A.
  • Improving judgment with prepaid expert advice
    Sniezek, J.A.; Schrah, G.E.; Dalal, R.S.
  • Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others’ opinions
    Soll, J.B.; Larrick, R.P.
  • Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved
    Soll, J.B.; Mannes, A.E.
  • Pooling of unshared information in group decision making
    Stasser, G.; Titus, W.
  • Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion
    Stasser, G.; Titus, W.
  • Hidden profiles: a brief history
    Stasser, G.; Titus, W.
  • Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups
    Stasser, G.; Taylor, L.A.; Hanna, C.
  • A social values analysis of self-other differences in decision making involving risk
    Stone, E.R.; Allgaier, L.
  • Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self
    Stone, E.R.; Yates, A.J.; Caruthers, A.S.
  • Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: the influence of widely held values
    Stoner, J.A.F.
  • Why groups are less effective than their members: on productivity losses in idea-generating groups
    Stroebe, W.; Diehl, M.
  • The illusion of group effectivity
    Stroebe, W.; Diehl, M.; Abakoumkin, G.
  • The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses
    Sulmasy, D.P.; Terry, P.B.; Weisman, C.S.; Miller, D.J.; Stallings, R.Y.; Vettese, M.A.; Haller, K.B.
  • A systematic small group approach to creativity and innovation: a case study
    Thamia, S.; Woods, M.F.
  • Asset management in the UK 2016–2017
  • Perceived expertise and its effect on confidence
    Trafimow, D.; Sniezek, J.A.
  • Surrogate utility estimation by long-term partners and unfamiliar dyads
    Tunney, R.J.; Ziegler, F.V.
  • Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases
    Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D.
  • The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice
    Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D.
  • Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves
    Ubel, P.A.; Angott, A.M.; Zikmund-Fisher, B.J.
  • Physicians’ and spouses’ predictions of elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences
    Uhlmann, R.F.; Pearlman, R.A.; Cain, K.C.
  • Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice
    Van Swol, L.M.; Sniezek, J.A.
  • Review annals of internal medicine systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others
    Wendler, D.; Rid, A.
  • Predicting preferences: an examination of agent learning
    West, P.M.
  • Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations
    Wilson, T.D.; Brekke, N.
  • Mutual enhancement: toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information
    Wittenbaum, G.M.; Hubbell, A.P.; Zuckerman, C.
  • The benefit of additional opinions
    Yaniv, I.
  • Receiving other people’s advice: influence and benefit
    Yaniv, I.
  • Advice taking in decision making: egocentric discounting and reputation formation
    Yaniv, I.; Kleinberger, E.
  • The social influence of confidence in group decision making
    Zarnoth, P.; Sniezek, J.A.