Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Balancing the scorecard through academic accounting research: opportunity lost?

Balancing the scorecard through academic accounting research: opportunity lost? Purpose – As one of the co‐authors of the first academic research papers published in a major accounting research journal on the subject of the balanced scorecard, the author was asked to reflect on his experiences with research in this area over the last 12 years since that first paper was published. The purpose of this paper is to do this through personal reflection and a literature review. Design/methodology/approach – Employing personal reflection and a literature review, the author examines three issues: what motivated him to start this research program; the way the research program unfolded and its unintended consequences; and finally some reflections on the academic research enterprise as it is practised in North America that are reflected by the unintended consequences. Findings – The author looks at the differences in psychology research traditions and how they shaped the research program on the balanced scorecard into an attempt to “debias” a problem rather than to bring strong human information processing theory to bear on how the scorecard dealt with some of the issues in its application. The author suggests that these different focuses explain how management accounting behavioral researchers lost an opportunity to have greater impact in the development of this performance tool. Originality/value – The paper questions and documents limitations that arise from the reliance on an underlying psychology paradigm that focuses on human limitations, rather than one focused on aiding humans to perform better. It suggests that greater research contributions in management accounting could be obtained if more researchers focused on how management accounting information can be developed that takes advantage of human information processing strengths. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change Emerald Publishing

Balancing the scorecard through academic accounting research: opportunity lost?

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/balancing-the-scorecard-through-academic-accounting-research-0oYGb06Ghl
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1832-5912
DOI
10.1108/18325911211273473
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – As one of the co‐authors of the first academic research papers published in a major accounting research journal on the subject of the balanced scorecard, the author was asked to reflect on his experiences with research in this area over the last 12 years since that first paper was published. The purpose of this paper is to do this through personal reflection and a literature review. Design/methodology/approach – Employing personal reflection and a literature review, the author examines three issues: what motivated him to start this research program; the way the research program unfolded and its unintended consequences; and finally some reflections on the academic research enterprise as it is practised in North America that are reflected by the unintended consequences. Findings – The author looks at the differences in psychology research traditions and how they shaped the research program on the balanced scorecard into an attempt to “debias” a problem rather than to bring strong human information processing theory to bear on how the scorecard dealt with some of the issues in its application. The author suggests that these different focuses explain how management accounting behavioral researchers lost an opportunity to have greater impact in the development of this performance tool. Originality/value – The paper questions and documents limitations that arise from the reliance on an underlying psychology paradigm that focuses on human limitations, rather than one focused on aiding humans to perform better. It suggests that greater research contributions in management accounting could be obtained if more researchers focused on how management accounting information can be developed that takes advantage of human information processing strengths.

Journal

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 26, 2012

Keywords: Balanced scorecard; Management accounting; Behavioural research; Accounting; Auditing; Performance evaluation; Decision making; Management control systems; Performance measurement

References

  • The balanced scorecard: judgment effects of performance measures linked to strategy
    Banker, R.; Chang, H.; Pizzini, M.
  • The death of the author
    Barthes, R.
  • Judgment in Managerial Decision Making
    Bazerman, M.H.; Moore, D.
  • Application of a balanced scorecard system for supporting decision‐making in contaminated sites remediation
    Bezama, A.; Szarka, N.; Wolfbauer, J.; Lorber, K.
  • Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting
    Bonner, S.
  • The Information Mosaic
    Bruns, W.J. Jr; McKinnon, S.M.
  • Financial versus non‐financial information: the impact of information organization and presentation in a balanced scorecard
    Cardinaels, E.; van Veen‐Dirks, P.
  • The mind's eye in chess
    Chase, W.G.; Simon, H.
  • The differential improvements effects of the strategy map and the scorecard perspectives on managers' strategic judgments
    Cheng, M.; Humphreys, K.A.
  • Motivating truthful subordinate reporting: an experimental investigation in a two‐subordinate context
    Chow, C.W.; Hirst, M.K.; Shields, M.D.
  • Accounting in organized anarchies: understanding and designing accounting systems in ambiguous situations
    Cooper, D.J.; Hayes, D.; Wolf, F.
  • Empirical analysis of the commercial loan classification decision
    Dietrich, J.R.; Kaplan, R.S.
  • Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers
    Dilla, W.N.; Steinbart, P.J.
  • Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business
    Eckerson, W.W.
  • The balanced scorecard and Tableau de Bord: translating strategy into action
    Epstein, M.; Manzoni, J.
  • What is an author?
    Foucault, M.
  • Evidence about auditor‐client management negotiation concerning the client's financial reporting
    Gibbins, M.; Salterio, S.; Webb, A.
  • From tools to heuristics: a heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology
    Gigerenzer, G.
  • Heuristic decision making
    Gigerenzer, G.; Gaissmaier, W.
  • Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
    Gigerenzer, G.; Todd, P.M.; the ABC Research Group
  • Multitask principal‐agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design
    Holmstrom, B.; Milgrom, P.
  • An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation
    Hopwood, A.
  • Leadership climate and the use of accounting data in performance evaluation
    Hopwood, A.
  • Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the balanced scorecard: relevance lost or relevance gained and sustained?
    Hoque, Z.
  • Personnel decision making: the impact of missing information
    Jagacinski, C.M.
  • Balancing dilemmas of the balanced scorecard
    Johanson, U.; Skoog, M.; Backlund, A.; Almqvist, R.
  • Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives
    Johnson, M.
  • Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting
    Johnson, H.T.; Kaplan, R.S.
  • Are auditors' judgments sufficiently regressive?
    Joyce, E.; Biddle, G.
  • The role for empirical research in management accounting
    Kaplan, R.
  • Innovation action research: creating new management theory and practice
    Kaplan, R.
  • The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Putting the balanced scorecard to work
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results
    Kennedy, J.
  • Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment
    Kennedy, J.
  • Social Cognition: Making Sense of People
    Kunda, Z.
  • Debiasing
    Larrick, R.P.
  • Third‐generation balanced scorecard: evolution of an effective strategic control tool
    Lawrie, G.; Cobbold, I.
  • Incentive effects and the cognitive processes involved in accounting judgments
    Libby, R.; Lipe, M.
  • Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment
    Libby, R.; Luft, J.
  • The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment
    Libby, T.; Salterio, S.; Webb, A.
  • Discussion of the effect of forecast redundancy on judgments of a consensus forecast's expected accuracy
    Lipe, M.
  • The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of information organization and diversity
    Lipe, M.; Salterio, S.
  • Balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures
    Lipe, M.; Salterio, S.
  • A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization
    Lipe, M.; Salterio, S.
  • Profit comparisons, market prices, and managers' judgments about negotiated transfer prices
    Luft, J.; Libby, R.
  • The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for information processing
    Miller, G.
  • Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM
    Olson, O.; Humphrey, C.; Guthrie, J.
  • The recognition heuristics: a fast and frugal way to investment choice?
    Ortmann, A.; Gigerenzer, G.; Borges, B.; Goldstein, D.G.
  • The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
    Power, M.
  • Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations
    Roberts, M.L.; Albright, T.L.; Hibbets, A.R.
  • Researching accounting precedents: learning, efficiency, and effectiveness
    Salterio, S.
  • The effects of precedents and client position on auditors' financial accounting policy judgment
    Salterio, S.
  • Accounting consultation units: an organizational memory analysis
    Salterio, S.; Denham, R.
  • The persuasiveness of audit evidence: the case of accounting policy decisions
    Salterio, S.; Koonce, L.
  • The balanced scorecard: rhetoric versus research
    Salterio, S.; Webb, A.
  • Fifteen years in the trenches: auditor‐client negotiations exposed and explored
    Salterio, S.
  • Why balanced scorecards fail
    Schneiderman, A.M.
  • Automating the balanced scorecard
    Silk, S.
  • Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting
    Simon, H.A.
  • Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment
    Slovic, P.; MacPhillamy, D.
  • Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain
    Smith, E.E.; Kosslyn, S.M.
  • The Study of Sociology
    Spencer, H.
  • The balanced scorecard as a strategy evaluation tool: the effects of implementation involvement and a causal‐chain focus
    Tayler, W.
  • Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases
    Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D.
  • Contributions of accounting to measurement in management
    Vatter, W.J.
  • Competing values in healthcare: balancing the (un)balanced scorecard
    Wicks, A.M.; St. Clair, L.