Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jimmy Hill (2001)
A multidimensional study of the key determinants of effective SME marketing activity: Part 1International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 7
M. Bull, H. Crompton (2006)
Business practices in social enterprisesSocial Enterprise Journal, 2
J. Curran, R. Blackburn (2001)
Researching the small enterprise
A. Morrison, D. Deakins, L. Galloway (2002)
Financial Management in the SME: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Develop a Learning Pathway
Clifford Conway (2008)
Business planning training for social enterpriseSocial Enterprise Journal, 4
David Carson, Stanley Cromie (1989)
Marketing planning in small enterprises: A model and some empirical evidence∗Journal of Marketing Management, 5
F. Figge, Tobias Hahn, S. Schaltegger, M. Wagner (2002)
The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategyBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 11
G. Speckbacher (2003)
The economics of performance management in nonprofit organizationsNonprofit Management and Leadership, 13
R. Scase, R. Goffee (2015)
The Real World of the Small Business Owner
H. Haugh (2005)
A research agenda for social entrepreneurshipSocial Enterprise Journal, 1
K. Brouthers, F. Andriessen, Igor Nicolaes (1998)
Driving blind: Strategic decisionmaking in small companiesLong Range Planning, 31
P. Garengo, Stefano Biazzo, U. Bititci (2005)
Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs: A Review for a Research AgendaInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 7
Jane Gibbon, A. Affleck (2008)
Social enterprise resisting social accounting: reflecting on lived experiencesSocial Enterprise Journal, 4
David Carson (1990)
Some Exploratory Models for Assessing Small Firms′ Marketing Performance (A Qualitative Approach)European Journal of Marketing, 24
D. Storey (1994)
Understanding the small business sector
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1996)
The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action
J. Dees, B. Anderson (2003)
2. For-Profit Social Ventures
J. Holloway (1999)
A critical research agenda for organizational performance measurement
A. Somers (2005)
Shaping the balanced scorecard for use in UK social enterprisesSocial Enterprise Journal, 1
R. Paton (2003)
Managing and measuring social enterprises
F. Hines (2005)
Viable social enterprise: an evaluation of business support to social enterprisesSocial Enterprise Journal, 1
N. Coviello, R. Brodie, H. Munro (2000)
An investigation of marketing practice by firm sizeJournal of Business Venturing, 15
P. Jennings, G. Beaver (1997)
The Performance and Competitive Advantage of Small Firms: A Management PerspectiveInternational Small Business Journal, 15
D. Deakins, A. Morrison, L. Galloway (2002)
Evolution, financial management and learning in the small firmJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9
David Carson, A. Gilmore (2000)
Marketing at the Interface: Not ‘What’ but ‘How’Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8
A. Strauss, B. Glaser (1967)
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Purpose – To investigate the higher‐level skills needs and learning provisions for small medium social enterprises (SMSEs) in Northwest England in order to support strategies for lifelong learning and organizational development. Design/methodology/approach – The study involved the development of “Balance”, a tool based on an adapted form of Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard (1996) performance measurement and management tool, integrating the notion of incremental learning development, and utilizing Kolb and Fry’s (1975) organizational learning cycle. Discusses the findings of piloting the tool in 30 social enterprises to make a case for an alternative approach to business analysis, where a qualitative approach is put forward. Findings – The results indicated that the Balance tool provided SMSEs with an easy to use diagnostic tool for collating managers’ subjective opinions in order to simplify the analysis process and provide a reference point for discussing management skills needs. Reveals that there is a spectrum of social enterprise with the “need” or “social” driven organization at one end and the more “enterprise” driven organization at the other. Concludes that the “social” led business tends to focus on an informal, organic organizational system, utilising a loose business framework purely as a means to meeting the social/environment need, while the “enterprise” led business focuses on a structured business organizational system, embracing business logic and businesslike methods and discourse to meet the social/environment/business need. Originality/value – Builds on research which was published in the previous issue of this journal (“Business practices in social enterprises”, Social Enterprise Journal, Volume 2 Number 1 2006) and outlines the current understandings and shortcomings of SMSE management knowledge.
Social Enterprise Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 30, 2007
Keywords: Social enterprises; Balanced scorecard; Small to medium‐sized enterprises; Small enterprises; Social responsibility; Public administration; Business analysis; Organizational development; England
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.