Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Andrew Inkpen (2008)
Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and General MotorsSouthern Medical Journal, 29
(1991)
Competition for Competence and I
(2004)
Knowledge acquisition, knowle
(2008)
Knowledge transfer and intern
M. Zeng, Jean-françois Hennart (2002)
From learning races to cooperative specialization : Towards a new framework for alliance management
GM stake in PSA means services for Gefco
D. Holm (2015)
Exploration and Exploitation
Scott Herriott, Daniel Levinthal, C. Shapiro (2007)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
Andrew Inkpen (1998)
Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliancesAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
Mitsubishi Electric to Strengthen Relationship with Pioneer through Capital and Business Alliance
Christian Czipura, D. Jolly (2007)
Global airline alliances: sparking profitability for a troubled industryJournal of Business Strategy, 28
Pioneer Announces Strengthening of Business Alliance with Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Issuance of New Shares Through Third-Party Allotment
P. Beamish, Iris Berdrow (2003)
Learning From IJVs: The Unintended OutcomeLong Range Planning, 36
Pioneer Announces Capital/Business Alliance with NTT DOCOMO, INC. and Issuance of New Shares Through Third-Party Allotment
Patricia Norman (2004)
Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliancesJournal of Business Research, 57
G. Hamel (1991)
Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliancesSouthern Medical Journal, 12
R. Grant, C. Baden-Fuller (2004)
A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic AlliancesJournal of Management Studies, 41
Rachelle Sampson (2007)
R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on InnovationAcademy of Management Journal, 50
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework for understanding the learning outcomes of strategic alliances. Design/methodology/approach – On the basis of two dimensions of any strategic alliance – that is, similarity or dissimilarity of contribution of partners and explorative or exploitative nature of alliance – the author proposes a framework that recognizes four types of learning outcomes. Findings – The distinction of four types of alliance enables the author to identify their distinctive characteristics and learning outcomes. Originality/value – The paper increases the awareness of managers about the learning outcomes of strategic alliances, which helps managers to consider intended learning outcomes not only in planning, managing and evaluating any individual alliance but also in managing the alliance portfolio.
Journal of Business Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 15, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.