Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
What to do about preparing librarians for handling nonbook media has been the most vexing problem to face the library schools in the past five years. Or has it Janet Andrew's plea that nonbook materials should be treated as what they aregenuine library materialsdeserving of attention throughout any course designed to educate or train librarians produced, in the same issue of Audiovisual librarian in which it appeared, a response from the educators themselves to be accurate, from ten of the fifteen schools to whom the preprint of the article was circulated, and from an eleventh in a subsequent issue. Some respondents outlined their school's policies others questioned the validity of Ms Andrew's criticisms. If anything emerged from the debate, it was that that there is no consensus as to whether or not librarianship education should take special account of nonbook media, or if so, how this should be carried out.
Library Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.