Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Zahra
Entrepreneurial capability: opportunity pursuit and game changing
J.A. Arthurs, L.W. Busenitz
Dynamic capabilities and new venture performance: the moderating effects of venture capitalists
C.K. Prahalad, G. Hamel
The core competences of the corporation
Aimilia Protogerou, Y. Caloghirou, S. Lioukas (2012)
Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performanceIndustrial and Corporate Change, 21
Dorothy Leonard-Barton (1995)
Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation
K. Pavitt (1984)
Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy, 2
F. Klocke
Production technology in high‐wage countries: from ideas of today to products of tomorrow
F. Barrett (1998)
Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning
O. Granstrand (2000)
The shift towards intellectual capitalism -- the role of infocom technologies1Research Policy, 29
P. Patel, K. Pavitt (1997)
The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms
Anil Gaba, W. Viscusi, A. Meyer, F. Barrett (1998)
Coda : Creativity and Improvisation in Jazzand Organizations: Implications Fororganizational LearningOrganization Science, 9
G. Karagouni, A. Protogerou, Y. Caloghirou
Dynamic and autotelic capabilities in knowledge‐intensive, low‐tech ventures
V. Acha
The role of technological capabilities in determining performance: the case of the upstream petroleum industry – measuring technological strength
M. Fransman (1984)
Technological Capability in the Third World: An Overview and Introduction to some of the Issues raised in this Book
D. Bengoa, H. Kaufmann, G. Orange (2009)
Reflection on knowledge transfer methodologies in Eastern/Western European co‐operationsEuromed Journal of Business, 4
T. Baker, R. Nelson (2005)
Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial BricolageAdministrative Science Quarterly, 50
Dusya Vera, M. Crossan (2005)
Improvisation and Innovative Performance in TeamsOrgan. Sci., 16
P. Patel, K. Pavitt
The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path‐dependent, but not much variety
Sheila Cunnison, J. Orr (1997)
Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4
H. Hirsch-Kreinsen (2008)
"LOW-TECHNOLOGY": A FORGOTTEN SECTOR IN INNOVATION POLICYJournal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3
S. Iammarino, M. Piva, M. Vivarelli, N. von Tunzelmann
Technological capabilities and patterns of cooperation of UK firms: a regional investigation
Jonathan Arthurs, Lowell Busenitz (2006)
Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalistsJournal of Business Venturing, 21
E. Mansfield, M. Schwartz, Samuel Wagner (1981)
Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical StudyThe Economic Journal, 91
S. Winter (2003)
Understanding dynamic capabilitiesSouthern Medical Journal, 24
C. Moorman, Anne Miner (1998)
Organizational Improvisation and Organizational MemoryAcademy of Management Review, 23
W. Orlikowski, Debra Hofman (1996)
An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware TechnologiesSloan Management Review, 38
U. Lichtenthaler, H. Ernst (2007)
External Technology Commercialization in Large Firms: Results of a Quantitative Benchmarking StudyIO: Productivity
M. Zollo, S. Winter (2002)
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic CapabilitiesOrganization Science, 13
G. Karagouni, Y. Caloghirou (2013)
The nature and dimensions of autotelic capabilities in knowledge-intensive low-tech ventures: an introductionWorld Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9
S. Krabel, D.S. Siegel, V. Slavtchev
The internationalization of science and its influence on academic entrepreneurship
F. Malerba (1992)
Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical ChangeThe Economic Journal, 102
C. Prahalad, G. Hamel (1990)
The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. ., 68
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
María García‐Vega (2006)
Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firmsResearch Policy, 35
M. Aramand
Global entrepreneurial capabilities: Korean high‐tech SMEs
D. Taylor, Antonella Reintano (2006)
Networking in Calabria The case of Totti IndustrieEuromed Journal of Business, 1
J.F. Christensen
Analysing the Technology Base of the Firm
S. Zahra, H. Sapienza, P. Davidsson (2006)
Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research AgendaWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
G. Dosi, Marco Grazzi (2010)
On the nature of technologies: knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputsCambridge Journal of Economics, 34
Diamanto Politis (2005)
The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual FrameworkEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29
James Thompson (1967)
Organizations in Action
H. Berglund
Austrian economics and the study of entrepreneurship: concepts and contributions
George Chryssochoidis (2008)
Innovativeness and NPD processes/practices in the Greek food industryEuromed Journal of Business, 3
G. Karagouni, Y. Caloghirou
The dimensions of autotelic capabilities in knowledge‐intensive low‐tech ventures
D. Teece (2007)
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 28
S. Lall (1992)
Technological capabilities and industrializationWorld Development, 20
G. Karagouni
Autotelic capabilities and knowledge‐intensive entrepreneurship in low‐tech sectors
Constance Helfat, Margaret Peteraf (2003)
The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecyclesStrategic Management Journal, 24
M. Hatch, K. Weick (1998)
Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational AnalysisOrganization Science, 9
A. Lundvall
Innovation as an interactive process: from user‐producer interaction to the national system of innovation
P. Senge
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization
M. Hatch (1999)
Exploring the Empty Spaces of Organizing: How Improvisational Jazz Helps Redescribe Organizational StructureOrganization Studies, 20
K. Pavitt
Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory
S. Zahra (2008)
The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunitiesStrategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2
Y. Spanos, S. Lioukas (2001)
An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspectiveStrategic Management Journal, 22
Erwin Danneels (2008)
Organizational antecedents of second‐order competencesSouthern Medical Journal, 29
Shona Brown, K. Eisenhardt (1997)
The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 42
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the emerging concept of autotelic capabilities and their impact on operational capabilities, and in particular, technological capabilities.Designmethodologyapproach Autotelic capabilities and their dimensions are discussed since they constitute a novel framework for new venturing in knowledgeintensive, lowtech industries. Links among the dimensions of autotelic capabilities and technological capabilities formation are explored, focusing on production technologies.Findings The suggested links among autotelic and technological capabilities highlight the need to go beyond individualcentered explanations of entrepreneurial activities towards the formation of integrated capabilities. They strengthen the assumption that autotelic capabilities exist as higherorder capabilities in lowtech but knowledgeintensive venturing, are very specific, can be managed, and endue new ventures with technological capabilities.Research limitationsimplications As it is only a theoretical approach, the hypotheses validity needs empirical evaluation and further theory building and development. Research could include the rest of operational capabilities, issues of causalities and the empirical exploration of the concepts generalizability across a variety of contexts.Practical implications Entrepreneurial andor managerial teams should realize the importance of possessing and further cultivating autotelic capabilities in recognizing technological patterns connecting seemingly unrelated pieces of science and technologies. Intentional and organized cultivation of autotelic capabilities supports competitive new venture creation and sustainable development of both operational and dynamic capabilities.Originalityvalue The paper forms a part of the pioneering autotelic capabilities perspective, developed by the authors, which offers an alternative approach to much conventional entrepreneurial thinking. It is an original contribution to relevant literature, with both theoretical and practical value.
EuroMed Journal of Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 26, 2013
Keywords: Operations and production management; Technology‐led strategy; Entrepreneurialism; Low‐tech; Production technologies; Dynamic capabilities; Technological capabilities; Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship; Bricolage capability; Improvisational capability; Transcendental capability
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.