Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: does structure matter?

Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: does structure matter? PurposeThe article examines the relationship between structural arrangements of public agencies of Pakistan and their autonomy.Design/methodology/approachData was collected through a questionnaire using the key informant approach from 70 public agencies of Pakistan. Hypotheses were drawn from the structural instrumental perspective to examine the relation between structure and autonomy. In order to test the hypotheses, multivariate regression analysis was performed on the data. FindingsThe research highlights that out of the three major structural dimensions, horizontal specialization, vertical specialization and governing board, only governing board is seen to affect the HRM dimension of autonomy while vertical specialization is related to financial management autonomy. None of the three hypotheses were completely supported. The divergence of the results from the structural instrumental perspective points to other factors related to agencies including administrative culture and context of state that matter in delegation of autonomy to the agencies by the government.Originality/valueThis article contributes to an on-going debate on globalization of public management reforms with emphasis on structural instrumental explanation of the agencification in developing countries. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Public Sector Management Emerald Publishing

Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: does structure matter?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/autonomy-of-public-agencies-in-pakistan-does-structure-matter-fjWK761wKw
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3558
DOI
10.1108/IJPSM-02-2015-0019
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe article examines the relationship between structural arrangements of public agencies of Pakistan and their autonomy.Design/methodology/approachData was collected through a questionnaire using the key informant approach from 70 public agencies of Pakistan. Hypotheses were drawn from the structural instrumental perspective to examine the relation between structure and autonomy. In order to test the hypotheses, multivariate regression analysis was performed on the data. FindingsThe research highlights that out of the three major structural dimensions, horizontal specialization, vertical specialization and governing board, only governing board is seen to affect the HRM dimension of autonomy while vertical specialization is related to financial management autonomy. None of the three hypotheses were completely supported. The divergence of the results from the structural instrumental perspective points to other factors related to agencies including administrative culture and context of state that matter in delegation of autonomy to the agencies by the government.Originality/valueThis article contributes to an on-going debate on globalization of public management reforms with emphasis on structural instrumental explanation of the agencification in developing countries.

Journal

International Journal of Public Sector ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 8, 2016

There are no references for this article.