Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Turgut, A. Aslan, Nuran Denizalp (2021)
Academicians’ awareness, attitude, and use of open access during the COVID-19 pandemicJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54
(2002)
European cultural heritage online charter
Maria Costa (2013)
O uso de recursos educativos abertos (rea) como recursos didáticos: benefícios para alunos e professores. O caso do repositório científico de acesso aberto de Portugal, 8
(2004)
IFLA statement on open access to scholarly literature and research documentation
P. Cardoso (2017)
Práticas educacionais abertas no ensino superior público em Portugal: da teoria à prática - recursos educacionais abertos e acesso aberto
S. Coalition (n.d)
Statement on peer reviewed publications—plan S
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2003)
Berlin declaration
Sarah Fitzgerald, Zhehan Jiang (2020)
Scholarly Publishing at a Crossroads: Scholarly Perspectives on Open AccessInnovative Higher Education, 45
E. Rodrigues (2003)
RepositóriUM: repositório institucional da Universidade do Minho [Communication at the Salão Nobre of the University of Minho, in the public presentation of the RepositoriUM]
J. Rowley, L. Sbaffi, M. Sugden, Annabel Gilbert (2020)
Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisionsJournal of Information Science, 48
S. Harnad, T. Brody, François Vallières, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Y. Gingras, C. Oppenheim, H. Stamerjohanns, E. Hilf (2004)
The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open AccessSerials Review, 30
(2022)
COAR community framework for good practices in repositories version 2
eRCAAP (n.d)
Introdução ao acesso aberto
Michael Mabe, A. Mulligan (2011)
What Journal Authors Want: Ten Years of Results from Elsevier's Author Feedback ProgrammeNew Review of Information Networking, 16
Bhuva Narayan, E. Luca, Belinda Tiffen, Ashley England, Mal Booth, H. Boateng (2018)
Scholarly Communication Practices in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Study of Researchers’ Attitudes and Awareness of Open AccessOpen Information Science, 2
RCAAP (n.d)
Sobre o RCAAP
Manjula Wijewickrema, Vivien Petras (2017)
Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciencesLearned Publishing, 30
C. Potts (2013)
Up and Away: Open Access in Portugal
W. Crawford (2011)
Open access: what you need to know now
S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, R. Darby, Bettina Goerner, J. Hyppoelae, P. Igo-Kemenes, D. Kahn, S. Lambert, Anja Lengenfelder, Chris Leonard, S. Mele, Malgorzata Nowicka, P. Polydoratou, David Ross, Sergio Ruiz-Perez, Ralf Schimmer, Mark Swaisland, Wim Stelt (2011)
Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access PublishingArXiv, abs/1101.5260
(2015)
Promoting open knowledge and open science: report of the current state of repositories
V. Pilato, Clara Tran (2020)
Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing ChargesJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8
J. Carvalho, Nelson Torres, P. Lopes, C. Marques, Raquel Truta (2019)
Novo portal RCAAP: novas funcionalidades
Michael Boock, Tania Todorova, T. Trencheva, Radostina Todorova (2020)
Bulgarian authors’ open access awareness and preferencesLibrary Management, 41
M. Enserink (2016)
In dramatic statement, European leaders call for ‘immediate’ open access to all scientific papers by 2020Science
(2016)
Joint COAR-UNESCO statement on open access
(2021)
Horizon Europe: open science
(2002)
Budapest open access initiative
(2016)
Outcome of the council meeting -3470th Council meeting: competitiveness (internal Market, Industry, research and Space)
Surveying authors at doctoral-granting institutions of higher education in Portugal, the authors in this paper aim to seek to determine the extent to which Portuguese researchers prefer that their work appears in open access journals or open access repositories resulting in improved access to quality, peer-reviewed scientific information and faster scientific and technological advances. The authors also seek to gauge Portuguese author's familiarity with open access, the importance they attach to open access when choosing a publication outlet, and to determine their preferences for achieving open access.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology adopted in this research is the case study. The case study intends to understand a complex social phenomenon through an in-depth study holistically. In May 2020, the authors distributed a survey to faculty in all academic ranks at 14 Portuguese higher education institutions to learn the extent to which Portuguese authors currently make their research openly available, ascertain their awareness of open access, their support of the European Union (EU) open access goal and their preferences for achieving open access.FindingsResearchers at Portuguese universities overwhelmingly are aware of arguments in favor of open access and believe that open access benefits researchers in their fields. Portuguese researchers regularly publish in open access journals and deposit their papers in institutional or disciplinary repositories.Research limitations/implications16.7% of 740 potential respondents completed the survey. The relatively low response rate prevents extrapolations from being made to the universe. The study was implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, which, due to the disruption created in all sectors, made data collection complex and delayed its subsequent treatment.Originality/valueSimilar studies have been conducted at individual universities and in particular disciplines to determine the degree to which their faculty authors are aware of open access, its benefits, and preferences for achieving it. A similar study of Bulgarian university authors was conducted in 2018. No previous study of Portuguese authors at institutions of higher education has been conducted. The results will be useful to Portuguese institutions of higher education and academic libraries to establish and revise open access outreach and implementation services that may be helpful to their faculty in meeting EU open access and funder open access requirements.
Library Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 28, 2023
Keywords: Open access; Institutional repositories; Free access; Scientific production; Publication; Portugal
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.