Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Australian corporate environmental reporting: a comparative analysis of disclosure practices across voluntary and mandatory disclosure systems

Australian corporate environmental reporting: a comparative analysis of disclosure practices... Purpose – This paper extends the literature in the environmental disclosure area by examining annual report disclosure practices of Australian companies within the combined voluntary and mandatory environmental disclosure system. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis was used to investigate the environmental disclosures over three consecutive years in the annual reports of companies that would be subject to environmental regulation and/or perceived to be environmentally sensitive. Findings – The study finds that Australian listed companies have a propensity to disclose higher levels of positive environmental disclosures in the voluntary sections of the annual report than in the statutory sections of the annual report. Research limitations/implications – These results suggest that regulatory authorities may need to acknowledge the usefulness of mandatory disclosure requirements as a potential means of counter‐balancing the voluntary disclosure system. It has been argued that the annual report is not the sole disclosure medium used by companies Further research may not only investigate these issues but also add weight to arguments for more environmental accountability. Practical implications – The results suggest that companies adopt different disclosure approaches when the disclosures are potentially under surveillance or increased scrutiny via legislated environmental disclosure requirements. Originality value – This research provides evidence that companies continue to use greater levels of self‐puffery within a voluntary reporting environment than within a mandatory reporting environment, and suggests that stakeholders may be more likely to receive information that is less favourable to the corporation (and potentially more decision‐useful to stakeholders) within a legislated disclosure environment. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change Emerald Publishing

Australian corporate environmental reporting: a comparative analysis of disclosure practices across voluntary and mandatory disclosure systems

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/australian-corporate-environmental-reporting-a-comparative-analysis-of-6XlNJkS0DM
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1832-5912
DOI
10.1108/18325910510635344
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper extends the literature in the environmental disclosure area by examining annual report disclosure practices of Australian companies within the combined voluntary and mandatory environmental disclosure system. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis was used to investigate the environmental disclosures over three consecutive years in the annual reports of companies that would be subject to environmental regulation and/or perceived to be environmentally sensitive. Findings – The study finds that Australian listed companies have a propensity to disclose higher levels of positive environmental disclosures in the voluntary sections of the annual report than in the statutory sections of the annual report. Research limitations/implications – These results suggest that regulatory authorities may need to acknowledge the usefulness of mandatory disclosure requirements as a potential means of counter‐balancing the voluntary disclosure system. It has been argued that the annual report is not the sole disclosure medium used by companies Further research may not only investigate these issues but also add weight to arguments for more environmental accountability. Practical implications – The results suggest that companies adopt different disclosure approaches when the disclosures are potentially under surveillance or increased scrutiny via legislated environmental disclosure requirements. Originality value – This research provides evidence that companies continue to use greater levels of self‐puffery within a voluntary reporting environment than within a mandatory reporting environment, and suggests that stakeholders may be more likely to receive information that is less favourable to the corporation (and potentially more decision‐useful to stakeholders) within a legislated disclosure environment.

Journal

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 1, 2005

Keywords: Australia; Disclosure; Reports; Environmental regulations

References

  • Submission to Treasury on Corporations Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2005 Exposure Draft
  • Information to Assist in Complying with Section 299(1)(f) Corporations Law: Mandatory Environmental Reporting
  • New Financial Reporting and Procedural Requirements of the Corporations Law
  • Parliamentary Debates
  • Environmental Law in Australia
    Bates, G.M.
  • Compulsory environmental reporting in Denmark: an evaluation
    Bebbington, J.
  • Environmental disclosure research: review and synthesis
    Berthelot, S.; Cormier, D.; Magnan, N.
  • The public disclosure of environmental performance information – a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory
    Brown, N.; Deegan, C.
  • Environmental Reporting
  • The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency‐based analysis
    Cowen, S.S.; Ferreri, L.B.; Parker, L.D.
  • Do corporations perceive mandatory publication of pollution information for key stakeholders as a legitimacy threat
    Cunningham, S.; Gadenne, D.
  • Mandatory public environmental reporting in Australia: here today, gone tomorrow
    Deegan, C.
  • A study of the environmental disclosure policies of Australian corporations
    Deegan, C.; Gordon, B.
  • Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority
    Deegan, C.; Rankin, M.
  • The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports
    Deegan, C.; Rankin, M.
  • Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence
    Deegan, C.; Rankin, M.; Voght, P.
  • An investigation of the introduction of mandatory environmental reporting in Australia
    Frost, G.R.
  • Mandatory corporate environmental reporting in Australia: contested introduction belies effectiveness of its application
    Frost, G.R.; English, L.
  • The direction of green accounting policy: critical reflections
    Gallhofer, S.; Haslam, J.
  • Accounting for the Environment: the Greening of Accountancy Part II
    Gray, R.H.; Bebbington, K.J.; Walters, D.
  • Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies
    Gray, R.; Kouhy, R.; Lavers, S.
  • Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability
    Gray, R.H.; Owen, D.L.; Maunders, K.T.
  • Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory
    Guthrie, J.; Parker, L.
  • Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis
    Guthrie, J.; Parker, L.
  • Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies
    Hackston, D.; Milne, M.
  • Australian social responsibility disclosure: some insights into contemporary measurement
    Kelly, G.J.
  • Corporate Environmental Performance: A Different Look at the Performance of Australia's Top 100 Companies – Year
    Kerr, M.
  • KPMG International Survey of Environmental Reporting
  • Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology
    Krippendorf, K.
  • Attitudes of Australians towards the environment: 1975 to 1994
    Lothian, J.
  • Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis
    Milne, M.; Adler, R.
  • Managing legitimacy through increased corporate environmental reporting: an exploratory study
    O'Donovan, G.
  • Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory
    O'Donovan, G.
  • An assessment of the relationship between US corporate environmental performance and disclosure
    Rockness, J.
  • The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure
    Tilt, C.A.
  • The content and disclosure of Australian corporate environmental policies
    Tilt, C.A.
  • Social responsibility disclosures by Australian companies
    Trotman, K.B.
  • Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies
    Trotman, K.; Bradley, G.
  • Methodological issues: reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis
    Unerman, J.
  • Corporate Environmental Management
    Welford, R.
  • Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory
    Wilmshurst, T.; Frost, G.
  • Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms
    Zeghal, D.; Ahmed, A.