Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
There are many definitions of materiality and such differences indefinition show that there is great concern about the applicability ofmateriality in the auditing profession. Various materiality guidelineshave been recommended by both academic researchers and accountingbodies, but the Auditing Practices Board in the UK has yet to recommenda guideline of its own. Looks at the recommendations put forward bythose researchers and accounting bodies and the implications andpossible pros and cons of having structured guidelines by the auditingprofession in the UK. Concludes with a recommended materiality guidelinewhich the Auditing Practices Board should seriously consider and thepossibility of applying computerbased decision aids as a tool toimprove efficiency and effectiveness of decision making by the auditors.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.