Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Audit quality implications of regulatory change in South Africa

Audit quality implications of regulatory change in South Africa This paper explores how technical constructions of audit practice are influenced by mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR) regulations. The paper responds to calls for additional research on how external regulation influences audit quality and supplements the predominately quantitative research dealing specifically with firm rotation and its relevance for audit quality.Design/methodology/approachData are collected from South Africa which is the latest jurisdiction to adopt MAFR (from 2017). Detailed interviews with 49 participants comprising 24 audit partners and 25 non-auditors are conducted to explore how MAFR can impact audit quality. For this purpose, audit quality is defined according to a schematic developed interpretively and based on professional auditing standards and the prior research on audit quality.FindingsThere is no guarantee that MAFR will bolster auditors' independence or contribute to a more thorough audit approach. On the contrary, the effort required by incoming audit firms to gain an understanding of new clients coupled with material tendering costs is expected to decrease the profitability of audit engagements with adverse implications for audit quality. A loss of client experience and staff retention challenges may contribute further to a decline in audit quality. There may be some improvements to audit practice when an incumbent firm's work is going to be scrutinised by a new auditor but audit methodologies, including the nature and extent of testing performed, are not expected to change significantly because of MAFR. In this way, the regulation may be a symbolic response to a perceived decline in audit quality and auditor independence rather than part of an effective strategy to encourage more rigorous audit practice for the benefit of the users of financial statements.Originality/valueThe current paper provides one of the first exploratory accountants of how MAFR is expected to impact audit practice and, in turn, audit quality. The research responds to the call for more field-work studies on the mechanics of the audit process by engaging directly with practitioners instead of relying on inferential testing of broad audit quality surrogates. The study also makes an important empirical contribution by providing primary evidence on how external regulation influences audit practice from a seldom studied African perspective. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies Emerald Publishing

Audit quality implications of regulatory change in South Africa

Download PDF
31 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/audit-quality-implications-of-regulatory-change-in-south-africa-J06OPjag0v
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2042-1168
DOI
10.1108/jaee-11-2020-0290
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper explores how technical constructions of audit practice are influenced by mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR) regulations. The paper responds to calls for additional research on how external regulation influences audit quality and supplements the predominately quantitative research dealing specifically with firm rotation and its relevance for audit quality.Design/methodology/approachData are collected from South Africa which is the latest jurisdiction to adopt MAFR (from 2017). Detailed interviews with 49 participants comprising 24 audit partners and 25 non-auditors are conducted to explore how MAFR can impact audit quality. For this purpose, audit quality is defined according to a schematic developed interpretively and based on professional auditing standards and the prior research on audit quality.FindingsThere is no guarantee that MAFR will bolster auditors' independence or contribute to a more thorough audit approach. On the contrary, the effort required by incoming audit firms to gain an understanding of new clients coupled with material tendering costs is expected to decrease the profitability of audit engagements with adverse implications for audit quality. A loss of client experience and staff retention challenges may contribute further to a decline in audit quality. There may be some improvements to audit practice when an incumbent firm's work is going to be scrutinised by a new auditor but audit methodologies, including the nature and extent of testing performed, are not expected to change significantly because of MAFR. In this way, the regulation may be a symbolic response to a perceived decline in audit quality and auditor independence rather than part of an effective strategy to encourage more rigorous audit practice for the benefit of the users of financial statements.Originality/valueThe current paper provides one of the first exploratory accountants of how MAFR is expected to impact audit practice and, in turn, audit quality. The research responds to the call for more field-work studies on the mechanics of the audit process by engaging directly with practitioners instead of relying on inferential testing of broad audit quality surrogates. The study also makes an important empirical contribution by providing primary evidence on how external regulation influences audit practice from a seldom studied African perspective.

Journal

Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 31, 2021

Keywords: Mandatory audit firm rotation; Auditor independence; Audit tenure; Audit quality; Auditing

References

  • Mandatory audit firm rotation and prohibition of auditor-provided tax services – evidence from investment consultants' perceptions
    Aschauer, E.; Quick, R.
  • Is audit quality impacted by auditor relationships?
    Ball, F.; Tyler, J.; Wells, P.
  • Determinants of job satisfaction and its impact on employee performance and turnover intentions
    Balouch, R.; Hassan, F.
  • Auditors' identification with their clients and its effect on auditors' objectivity
    Bamber, E.M.; Iyer, V.M.
  • The future(s) of interpretive accounting research: a polyphonic response from beyond the metropolis
    Baxter, J.; Boedker, C.; Chua, W.F.
  • Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation
    Black, J.
  • Independence threats, litigation risk, and the auditor's decision process
    Blay, A.D.
  • An analysis of forced auditor change: the case of former Arthur Andersen clients
    Blouin, J.; Grein, B.M.; Rountree, B.R.
  • Past control risk and current audit fees
    Calderon, T.; Wang, L.; Klenoptic, T.
  • Are there adverse consequences of mandatory auditor rotation? Evidence from the Italian experience
    Cameran, M.; Francis, J.R.; Marra, A.; Pettinicchio, A.
  • Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality
    Cameran, M.; Prencipe, A.; Trombetta, M.
  • Audit effort and earnings management
    Caramanis, C.; Lennox, C.
  • Audit partner tenure and audit quality
    Carey, P.; Simnett, R.
  • Changes in audit market competition and the Big N premium
    Carson, E.; Simnett, R.; Soo, B.S.; Wright, A.M.
  • Can the academic literature contribute to the debate over mandatory audit firm rotation?
    Casterella, J.R.; Johnston, D.
  • Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?
    Chen, C.Y.; Lin, C.J.; Lin, Y.C.
  • Corrospondent: who guards the guards? The relevance of auditors in a post-financial scandal world
    Chester, N.
  • The impact of mandatory versus voluntary auditor switches on stock liquidity: some Korean evidence
    Choi, S.; Choi, Y.S.; Gul, F.A.; Lee, W.J.
  • The international federation of accountants (IFAC) response to the IRBA consultation paper
    Choudhury, F.
  • Audit firm rotation, audit fees and audit quality: the experience of Italian public companies
    Corbella, S.; Florio, C.; Gotti, G.; Mastrolia, S.A.
  • Interview-based research in accounting 2000–2014: informal norms, translation and vibrancy
    Dai, N.T.; Free, C.; Gendron, Y.
  • The effects of audit firm rotation on perceived auditor independence and audit quality
    Daniels, B.W.; Booker, Q.
  • An examination of partner perceptions of partner rotation: direct and indirect consequences to audit quality
    Daugherty, B.E.; Dickins, D.; Hatfield, R.C.; Higgs, J.L.
  • Auditor tenure and the ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts
    Davis, L.R.; Soo, B.S.; Trompeter, G.M.
  • Qualitative accounting research: dispelling myths and developing a new research agenda
    de Villiers, C.; Dumay, J.; Maroun, W.
  • Auditor size and audit quality
    DeAngelo, L.E.
  • A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews
    Dearnley, C.
  • A review of archival auditing research
    DeFond, M.; Zhang, J.
  • The effect of auditor changes on audit fees, audit hours, and audit quality
    Deis, D.R.; Giroux, G.
  • The qualitative research interview
    DiCicco-Bloom, B.; Crabtree, B.F.
  • Double loop learning; or, just another service to sell: a comment on ‘the case of sustainability assurance: constructing a new assurance service’
    Dillard, J.
  • Epistemic commitment and cognitive disunity toward fair-value accounting
    Durocher, S.; Gendron, Y.
  • Auctions for audit services and low-balling
    Elitzur, R.R.; Falk, H.
  • Engagement quality reviews: a comparison of audit firm practices
    Epps, K.K.; Messier, W.F.
  • Directorate-general for financial stability, EU audit reform
    European Commission
  • Mandatory audit firm rotation: a review of stakeholder perspectives and prior research
    Ewelt-Knauer, C.; Gold, A.; Pott, C.
  • An investigation of the impact of economic and organizational factors on auditor independence
    Farmer, T.A.; Rittenberg, L.E.; Trompeter, G.M.
  • The alumni effect and professional skepticism: an experimental investigation
    Favere-Marchesi, M.; Emby, C.
  • Audit quality attributes, client size and cost of equity capital
    Fernando, G.; Abdel-Meguid, A.; Elder, R.; Lubin, J.
  • Audit committee perspectives on mandatory audit firm rotation: evidence from Canada
    Fontaine, R.; Khemakhem, H.; Herda, D.N.
  • What do we know about audit quality?
    Francis, J.R.
  • A framework for understanding and researching audit quality
    Francis, J.R.
  • Financial reporting council – discussion paper: promoting audit quality
    FRC
  • Are PCAOB-identified audit deficiencies associated with a change in reporting decisions of triennially inspected audit firms?
    Gramling, A.A.; Krishnan, J.; Zhang, Y.
  • Mandatory audit firm rotation: a critical composition of practitioner views from an emerging economy
    Harber, M.; Maroun, W.
  • The perceived financial effects of mandatory audit firm rotation
    Harber, M.; Marx, B.; De Jager, P.
  • The frontiers of auditing research
    Hay, D.
  • European market reaction to audit reforms
    Horton, J.; Tsipouridou, M.; Wood, A.
  • Empirical evidence on audit quality under a dual mandatory auditor rotation rule
    Horton, J.; Livne, G.; Pettinicchio, A.
  • The effects of fee pressure and client risk on audit seniors' time-budget decisions
    Houston, R.W.
  • Auditing research: a review across the disciplinary divide
    Humphrey, C.
  • The audit expectations gap – plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose?
    Humphrey, C.; Moizer, P.; Turley, S.
  • Research on auditor professional skepticism: literature synthesis and opportunities for future research
    Hurtt, R.; Brown-Liburd, H.; Earley, C.; Krishnamoorthy, G.
  • An examination of auditor independence issues from the perspectives of U.K. Finance directors
    Hussey, R.; Lan, G.
  • Exposure draft: proposed international standard on quality management 1 (previously international standard on quality control 1)
    IAASB
  • Engagement planning, bid pricing, and client response to initial attest engagements
    Johnstone, K.; Bedard, J.
  • The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors' acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods
    Kadous, K.; Kennedy, J.; Peecher, M.E.
  • How does intrinsic motivation improve auditor skepticism in complex audit tasks
    Kadous, K.; Zhou, Y.
  • Discourse and audit change: transformations in methodology in the professional audit field
    Khalifa, R.; Sharma, N.; Humphrey, C.; Robson, K.
  • Does auditor designation by the regulatory authority improve audit quality? Evidence from Korea
    Kim, J.B.; Yi, C.H.
  • Audit quality and regulation
    Knechel, W.
  • Audit quality: insights from the academic literature
    Knechel, W.; Krishnan, G.; Pevzner, M.; Shefchik, L.; Velury, U.
  • The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit quality and audit fees: empirical evidence from the Korean audit market
    Kwon, S.Y.; Lim, Y.; Simnett, R.
  • The professionalization of accountancy. A history of protecting the public interest in a self-interested way
    Lee, T.
  • From peer review to PCAOB inspections: regulating for audit quality in the US
    Löhlein, L.
  • In pursuit of global regulation: changing governance and accountability structures at the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
    Loft, A.; Humphrey, C.; Turley, S.
  • Evaluating audit quality using the results of inspection processes performed by an independent regulator
    Logie, J.; Maroun, W.
  • Conservative reporting and the incremental effect of mandatory audit firm rotation policy: a comparative analysis of audit partner rotation vs audit firm rotation in South Korea
    Mali, D.; Lim, H.
  • Reining in auditors: on the dynamics of power surrounding an ‘innovation’ in the regulatory space
    Malsch, B.; Gendron, Y.
  • Modifying assurance practices to meet the needs of integrated reporting: the case for ‘interpretive assurance’
    Maroun, W.
  • Whistle-blowing by external auditors in South Africa: enclosure, efficient bodies and disciplinary power
    Maroun, W.; Atkins, J.
  • Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: a case for mandatory auditor rotation?
    Myers, J.N.; Myers, L.A.; Omer, T.C.
  • Mandatory audit firm turnover, financial reporting quality, and client bargaining power: the case of Arthur Andersen
    Nagy, A.L.
  • Big four accountancy firms should break up, say MPs
    Neate, R.
  • A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing
    Nelson, M.W.
  • Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting
    O'Dwyer, B.; Owen, D.; Unerman, J.
  • Comment letter Re: PCAOB rulemaking docket matter no. 37: concept release on auditor independence and audit firm rotation
    PCAOB
  • Auditing and the production of legitimacy
    Power, M.K.
  • Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – an experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions
    Quick, R.; Schmidt, F.
  • Investor reaction to the prospect of mandatory audit firm rotation
    Reid, L.C.; Carcello, J.V.
  • Auditor rotation: the PCAOB considers a new direction
    Roush, P.B.; Church, B.K.; Gregory Jenkins, J.; McCracken, S.A.; Stanley, J.D.
  • The companies act, 2008 (No 71 of 2008)
    RSA
  • The audit expectation gap: existence, causes, and the impact of changes
    Ruhnke, K.; Schmidt, M.
  • Does mandatory audit firm rotation enhance auditor independence? Evidence from Spain
    Ruiz-Barbadillo, E.; Gómez-Aguilar, N.; Carrera, N.
  • Engagement quality review: insights from academic literature
    Schneider, A.; Messier, W.
  • Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors
    Sikka, P.
  • International archival auditing and assurance research: trends, methodological issues, and opportunities
    Simnett, R.; Carson, E.; Vanstraelen, A.
  • Heuristics and biases: expertise and task realism in auditing
    Smith, J.F.; Kida, T.
  • The causes and consequences of auditor switching: a review of the literature
    Stefaniak, C.M.; Robertson, J.C.; Houston, R.W.
  • Editorial: the new era of mixed methods
    Tashakkori, A.; Creswell, J.
  • Auditor independence and audit quality: a literature review
    Tepalagul, N.; Lin, L.
  • Reforming the big four – shape up, not break up
    The Economist
  • The great expectations gap. What is an audit for?
    The Economist
  • The big four may be blocked from doing Indian audits for years to come
    The Economist
  • Holding auditors blameless
    The New York Times
  • In whose interest? A critical examination of public interest appeals made by the public accounting profession in the USA
    Thornburg, S.; Roberts, R.W.
  • The impact of knowledge sharing culture on job satisfaction in accounting firms the mediating effect of general competencies
    Trivellas, P.; Akrivouli, Z.; Tsifora, E.; Tsoutsa, P.
  • Enron, WorldCom, Andersen et al.: a challenge to modernity
    Unerman, J.; O'Dwyer, B.
  • The impact of auditor rotation on auditor–client negotiation
    Wang, K.J.; Tuttle, B.M.
  • The world economic forum global competitiveness report 2016–2017
    WEF
  • PCAOB inspections: public accounting firms on ‘trial’
    Westermann, K.D.; Cohen, J.; Trompeter, G.
  • Audit firm perspective on audit firm rotation and enhancing independence: evidence from PCAOB comment letters
    Williams, L.T.; Wilder, W.M.
  • Audit firm tenure, auditor familiarity, and trust: effect on auditee whistleblowing reporting intentions
    Wilson, A.B.; McNellis, C.; Latham, C.K.