Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Audit fee discounting in the post-SOX environment

Audit fee discounting in the post-SOX environment This paper aims to investigate whether the expected implementation of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX 404(b)) (the integrated audit requirement) caused auditors to discount their audit fees for non-accelerated filers in anticipation of expected increased future economic rents (DeAngelo, 1981) from those clients.Design/methodology/approachThis paper predicts that auditors charged their non-accelerated filer clients lower audit fees during the years 2005-2007 (in anticipation of increased expected future economic rents from the implementation of the SOX 404(b) requirement) compared with the years 2010-2012 (when it had been determined that non-accelerated filers were permanently exempt from complying with SOX 404(b)). The authors use ordinary least squares regression analysis to examine whether audit fees increased significantly for non-accelerated filers after the permanent exemption announcement.FindingsThe results show a significant positive association between the exemption announcement and audit fees, supporting the theory that auditors discounted their audit fees for non-accelerated filers in the pre-exemption announcement period. This finding is robust when sensitivity tests are used.Practical implicationsThe findings of audit fee discounting literature related to the post-SOX period are mixed. This study adds to this stream of literature by supporting the notion that audit fee discounting is being practiced post-SOX and is a potential unintended consequence of SOX 404 and the exemption. Thus, investors will be interested in the results of this paper when making their investment decisions with regard to non-accelerated filers.Social implicationsThe results of this paper show that, even in the post-SOX environment, auditors will employ the use of audit fee discounting if a change in regulation incentivizes it. This commentary on the present state of the audit pricing market should be of interest to audit pricing policymakers.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first to study audit fee discounting outside the realm of initial audit engagements. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Managerial Auditing Journal Emerald Publishing

Audit fee discounting in the post-SOX environment

Hoffman, Benjamin W.; Nagy, Albert L.
Managerial Auditing Journal , Volume 32 (7): 16 – Sep 25, 2017
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/audit-fee-discounting-in-the-post-sox-environment-fODaA7NnXg
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0268-6902
DOI
10.1108/maj-03-2016-1335
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate whether the expected implementation of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX 404(b)) (the integrated audit requirement) caused auditors to discount their audit fees for non-accelerated filers in anticipation of expected increased future economic rents (DeAngelo, 1981) from those clients.Design/methodology/approachThis paper predicts that auditors charged their non-accelerated filer clients lower audit fees during the years 2005-2007 (in anticipation of increased expected future economic rents from the implementation of the SOX 404(b) requirement) compared with the years 2010-2012 (when it had been determined that non-accelerated filers were permanently exempt from complying with SOX 404(b)). The authors use ordinary least squares regression analysis to examine whether audit fees increased significantly for non-accelerated filers after the permanent exemption announcement.FindingsThe results show a significant positive association between the exemption announcement and audit fees, supporting the theory that auditors discounted their audit fees for non-accelerated filers in the pre-exemption announcement period. This finding is robust when sensitivity tests are used.Practical implicationsThe findings of audit fee discounting literature related to the post-SOX period are mixed. This study adds to this stream of literature by supporting the notion that audit fee discounting is being practiced post-SOX and is a potential unintended consequence of SOX 404 and the exemption. Thus, investors will be interested in the results of this paper when making their investment decisions with regard to non-accelerated filers.Social implicationsThe results of this paper show that, even in the post-SOX environment, auditors will employ the use of audit fee discounting if a change in regulation incentivizes it. This commentary on the present state of the audit pricing market should be of interest to audit pricing policymakers.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first to study audit fee discounting outside the realm of initial audit engagements.

Journal

Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 25, 2017

Keywords: Audit fees; Audit pricing; Internal control; SOX 404; Audit fee discounting

References

  • 404(b) for Small Cos. Delayed to FYEs Until June 15, 2010
    Aguilar, M.
  • Financial Regulation Moves Ahead, With SOX Exemption
    Aguilar, M.
  • Audit pricing and internal control disclosures among non-accelerated filers
    Bedard, J.; Hoitash, U.; Hoitash, R.
  • Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations
    Craswell, A.; Francis, J.; Taylor, S.
  • Pricing initial audit engagements: a test of competing theories
    Craswell, A.; Francis, J.
  • Audit independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation
    DeAngelo, L.E.
  • A reexamination of audit fees for initial audit engagements in the post-SOX period
    Desir, R.; Casterella, J.; Kokina, J.
  • Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements
    Ettredge, M.; Greenberg, R.
  • Fee pressure and audit quality
    Ettredge, M.; Fuerherm, E.; Li, C.
  • The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing
    Ferguson, A.; Francis, J.; Stokes, D.
  • The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market
    Francis, J.; Reichelt, K.; Wang, D.
  • The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management
    Frankel, R.; Johnson, M.; Nelson, K.
  • Pricing of initial audit engagements by large and small audit firms
    Ghosh, A.; Lustgarten, S.
  • The impact of regulation on auditor fees: evidence from the sarbanes-oxley act
    Ghosh, A.; Pawlewicz, R.
  • 111th congress: small business SOX compliance relief act
  • 111th congress: Dodd-frank wall street reform and consumer protection act
  • The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations
    Halverson, R.; Palmquist, R.
  • Audit fees and engagement profitability: a threats and safeguards approach to strengthen compliance with standards of ethical behaviour
    Hansen, G.
  • Audit fees for initial audit engagements before and after SOX
    Huang, H.; Raghunandan, K.; Rama, D.
  • Audit pricing, lowballing and auditor turnover: a dynamic analysis
    Kanodia, C.; Mukherji, A.
  • Costs to comply with SOX section 404
    Krishnan, J.; Rama, D.; Zhang, Y.
  • Is there a relation between audit fee cuts during the global financial crisis and banks’ financial reporting quality?
    Krishnan, G.; Zhang, Y.
  • Audit partner specialization and audit fees
    Nagy, A.L.
  • Concept Release on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation
  • SOX section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees
    Raghunandan, K.; Rama, D.V.
  • Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: Empirical Evidence Following Public Disclosure of of Audit Fees
    Sankaraguruswamy, S.; Whisenant, S.
  • Pricing and quality of initial audit engagements
    Sankaraguruswamy, S.; Whisenant, S.; Willenborg, M.
  • The effect of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery
    Simon, D.T.; Francis, J.R.
  • The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence
    Simunic, D.
  • Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: an analysis of industry specialization and fee effects
    Stanley, J.; DeZoort, F.
  • The role of auditee profitability in pricing new audit engagements
    Walker, P.; Casterella, J.