Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B.G. Malkiel, Y. Xu (1999)
The structure of stock market volatility
Journal of Finance, 41
Review of Financial studies, 6
Journal of Finance, 40
Journal of Finance, 56
Review of Finance, 20
Journal of Political Economy, 103
Econometrica, 41
Journal of Financial Economics, 49
Journal of Finance, 42
American Economic Review, 70
Journal of Financial Markets, 7
Journal of Financial Economics, 104
Review of Financial Studies, 28
Review of Financial Studies, 22
Review of Accounting Studies
Review of Financial Studies, 13
Journal of Finance, 63
Journal of Financial Economics, 109
S. Figlewski, X. Wang (2000)
Is the ‘leverage effect’ a leverage effect?
Journal of Financial Economics, 120
Addiction, 88
Journal of Finance, 56
Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17
Review of Financial Studies, 24
Journal of Finance, 56
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 204
J. Luo, A. Subrahmanyam (2017)
The implications of stock ownership is a consumption good: a theoretical perspective
Journal of Finance, 64
Review of Financial Studies, 2
Journal of Financial Economics, 10
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22
Journal of Finance, 53
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35
Review of Finance, 16
Journal of Finance, 53
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34
X.A. Bellotti, R. Taffler, L. Tian (2010)
Understanding the Chinese stock market bubble: the role of emotion
J. Caskey (2017)
Ambiguity aversion and asset prices in large economies
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92
Journal of Financial Economics, 41
N.L. Baker, R.A. Haugen (2012)
Low risk stocks outperform within all observable markets of the world
Journal of Political Economy, 102
Journal of Financial Economics, 101
Journal of Finance, 47
Addiction, 94
Review of Financial Studies, 19
Journal of Business, 98
Journal of Economic Theory, 26
T.G. Bali, S. Brown, S. Murray, Y. Tang (2016)
A lottery demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly
Management Science, 62
Management Science, 55
A. Frazzini, D. Kabiller, L.H. Pedersen (2013)
Sell more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee diversification
Journal of Finance, 55
American Economic Review, 97
Management Science, 36
Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4
Review of Economic Studies, 77
Journal of Finance, 65
Neuronal and Psychological Underpinnings of Pathological Gambling
Journal of Financial Markets, 1
Journal of Monetary Economics, 15
Journal of Financial Economics, 111
Journal of Economic Theory, 13
Science, 299
Review of Financial Studies, 20
Neuron, 51
R. Dhar, W.N. Goetzmann (2006)
Bubble investors: what were they thinking?
Journal of Finance, 64
Journal of Finance, 61
National Tax Journal, 55
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 14
Journal of Finance, 59
The Journal of Finance, 54
Journal of Finance, 52
High levels of turnover in financial markets are consistent with the notion that trading, like gambling, yields direct utility to some agents. The purpose of this paper is to show that the presence of these agents attenuates covariance risk pricing and volatility, and implies a negative relation between volume and future returns. Since psychological literature indicates that the desirability of a gamble arises from the ex ante volatility of the outcome, the authors propose that agents derive greater utility from trading more volatile stocks. These stocks earn lower average returns in equilibrium, although the risk premium on the market portfolio is positive. The authors then consider a dynamic setting where agents’ utility from trading increases when they make positive profits in earlier rounds (e.g. due to an endowment effect). This leads to “bubbles,” i.e. disproportionate jumps in asset returns as a function of past prices, higher volume in up markets relative to down markets, as well as a leverage effect, wherein down markets are followed by higher volatility than up markets.Design/methodology/approachAnalytical.FindingsThe presence of gamblers attenuates covariance risk pricing and volatility, and implies a negative relation between volume and future returns. If gamblers prefer more volatile stocks, these stocks earn lower average returns in equilibrium. If agents’ utility from trading increases when they make positive profits in earlier rounds (e.g. to an endowment effect), this leads to higher volume and lower volatility in up markets relative to down markets.Originality/valueNo paper has previously modeled agents who derive direct utility from trading.
Review of Behavioral Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 24, 2019
Keywords: Finance; Volume; Behavioural
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.