Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessment of logistics service quality using the Kano model in a logistics-triadic relationship

Assessment of logistics service quality using the Kano model in a logistics-triadic relationship PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate logistics service quality using the Kano’s service quality model in the logistics-triadic context.Design/methodology/approachThis study undertakes a survey research in semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) industry. Logistics service quality is categorized using Kano’s classification and a comparison is made of the perception of three sample groups who are SME firms, semiconductor manufacturers (SMs) and third-party logistics (TPL) providers.FindingsSeveral attributes of logistics service quality are evaluated as “Must-be” quality which does not contribute to customer satisfaction, indicating existence of the non-linear relationship between some logistics service quality attributes and customers’ satisfaction. The group comparison reveals that TPL firms perceive most quality attributes as “Attractive” and “One-dimensional” whereas SMs and SME firms perceive more attributes as “Must-be.”Research limitations/implicationsLogistics service quality elements should not be used in the same way assuming the same effect of logistics service elements on customer satisfaction. It should be also noted that logistics service quality attributes have different effect on satisfaction according to the positions in the logistics triad.Practical implicationsThis paper provides SME firms with useful information on how to manage their logistics service quality to improve customer satisfaction. SME firms and TPL providers need to arrange a collaborative format where logistics service quality is regularly monitored and three members discuss solutions to improve their quality performance.Originality/valueThis study is a rare empirical investigation to actually assess and compare perception on logistics service quality among the entities in a logistics triad. This study applies the Kano model to the triadic relationship in logistics service provision, which may be the first attempt to the authors’ best knowledge. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Logistics Management Emerald Publishing

Assessment of logistics service quality using the Kano model in a logistics-triadic relationship

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/assessment-of-logistics-service-quality-using-the-kano-model-in-a-Qv6000wI02
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0957-4093
DOI
10.1108/IJLM-09-2015-0172
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate logistics service quality using the Kano’s service quality model in the logistics-triadic context.Design/methodology/approachThis study undertakes a survey research in semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) industry. Logistics service quality is categorized using Kano’s classification and a comparison is made of the perception of three sample groups who are SME firms, semiconductor manufacturers (SMs) and third-party logistics (TPL) providers.FindingsSeveral attributes of logistics service quality are evaluated as “Must-be” quality which does not contribute to customer satisfaction, indicating existence of the non-linear relationship between some logistics service quality attributes and customers’ satisfaction. The group comparison reveals that TPL firms perceive most quality attributes as “Attractive” and “One-dimensional” whereas SMs and SME firms perceive more attributes as “Must-be.”Research limitations/implicationsLogistics service quality elements should not be used in the same way assuming the same effect of logistics service elements on customer satisfaction. It should be also noted that logistics service quality attributes have different effect on satisfaction according to the positions in the logistics triad.Practical implicationsThis paper provides SME firms with useful information on how to manage their logistics service quality to improve customer satisfaction. SME firms and TPL providers need to arrange a collaborative format where logistics service quality is regularly monitored and three members discuss solutions to improve their quality performance.Originality/valueThis study is a rare empirical investigation to actually assess and compare perception on logistics service quality among the entities in a logistics triad. This study applies the Kano model to the triadic relationship in logistics service provision, which may be the first attempt to the authors’ best knowledge.

Journal

The International Journal of Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 8, 2017

References

  • Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance
  • An application of integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for logistics services: a case study from Turkey
  • Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains – a strategic perspective
  • Transportation contracts and the experience effect: a frame
  • Measuring physical distribution service quality
  • Capturing the customer’s voice, the centrepiece of strategy making: a case study in banking
  • Clockspeed‐based strategies for supply chain design
  • The logistics services outsourcing dilemma: quality management and financial performance perspectives
  • An applied service marketing theory
  • A service quality model and its marketing implications
  • Creating a relationship dialogue: communication, interaction and value