Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessing organisational development in European primary care using a group‐based method A feasibility study of the Maturity Matrix

Assessing organisational development in European primary care using a group‐based method A... Purpose – The Maturity Matrix is a tool designed in the UK to assess family practice organisational development and to stimulate quality improvement. It is practice‐led, formative and undertaken by a practice team with the help of trained facilitators. The aim of this study is to assess the Maturity Matrix as a tool and an organisational development measure in European family practice settings. Design/methodology/approach – Using a c onvenience sample of 153 practices and 11 facilitators based in the UK, Germany, The Netherlands, Switzerland and Slovenia, feasibility was assessed against six criteria: completion; coverage; distribution; scaling; translation; and missing data. Information sources were responses to evaluation questionnaires by facilitators and completed Maturity Matrix profiles. Findings – All practices taking part completed the Maturity Matrix sessions successfully. The Netherlands, the UK and Germany site staff suggested including additional dimensions: interface between primary and secondary care; access; and management of expendable materials. Maturity Matrix scores were normally distributed in each country. Scaling properties, translation and missing data suggested that the following dimensions are most robust across the participating countries: clinical performance audit; prescribing; meetings; and continuing professional development. Practice size did not make a significant difference to the Maturity Matrix profile scores. Originality/value – The study suggests that the Maturity Matrix is a feasible and valuable tool, helping practices to review organisational development as it relates to healthcare quality. Future research should focus on developing dimensions that are generic across European primary care settings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Emerald Publishing

Assessing organisational development in European primary care using a group‐based method A feasibility study of the Maturity Matrix

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/assessing-organisational-development-in-european-primary-care-using-a-eTXkIznt8U
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0952-6862
DOI
10.1108/09526861011010640
pmid
21387860
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The Maturity Matrix is a tool designed in the UK to assess family practice organisational development and to stimulate quality improvement. It is practice‐led, formative and undertaken by a practice team with the help of trained facilitators. The aim of this study is to assess the Maturity Matrix as a tool and an organisational development measure in European family practice settings. Design/methodology/approach – Using a c onvenience sample of 153 practices and 11 facilitators based in the UK, Germany, The Netherlands, Switzerland and Slovenia, feasibility was assessed against six criteria: completion; coverage; distribution; scaling; translation; and missing data. Information sources were responses to evaluation questionnaires by facilitators and completed Maturity Matrix profiles. Findings – All practices taking part completed the Maturity Matrix sessions successfully. The Netherlands, the UK and Germany site staff suggested including additional dimensions: interface between primary and secondary care; access; and management of expendable materials. Maturity Matrix scores were normally distributed in each country. Scaling properties, translation and missing data suggested that the following dimensions are most robust across the participating countries: clinical performance audit; prescribing; meetings; and continuing professional development. Practice size did not make a significant difference to the Maturity Matrix profile scores. Originality/value – The study suggests that the Maturity Matrix is a feasible and valuable tool, helping practices to review organisational development as it relates to healthcare quality. Future research should focus on developing dimensions that are generic across European primary care settings.

Journal

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 12, 2010

Keywords: Organizational development; Primary care; Quality improvement; Europe

References

  • The facilitation of multiprofessional clinical audit in primary health care – from audit to quality assurance
    Baker, R.; Sorrie, R.; Reddish, S.
  • Reforming the Health Sector
    Bocken, J.; Butzlaff, M.; Esche, A.
  • Health Care and General Practice across Europe
    Boerma, W.G.W.; De Jong, F.A.J.M.; Mulder, P.H.
  • National standards for general practice
    Booth, B.; Hays, R.; Douglas, K.
  • Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons
    Buetow, S.A.; Buetow, J.W.
  • A Review of Continuing Professional Development in General Practice: A Report by the Chief Medical Officer
    Calman, K.
  • One Dorset practice's experience of using a quality improvement approach to practice professional development planning
    Campion‐Smith, C.; Riddoch, A.
  • Health as a global public good
    Chen, L.C.; Evans, T.G.; Cash, R.A.
  • Understanding practice from the ground up
    Crabtree, B.F.; Miller, W.L.; Stange, K.C.
  • Facilitating quality improvement in primary health care by practice visiting
    Eliasson, G.; Berg, L.; Carlsson, P.
  • Assessing organisational development in primary medical care using a group‐based assessment: the Maturity Matrix
    Elwyn, G.; Rhydderch, M.; Edwards, A.; Hutchings, H.; Marshall, M.; Grol, R.
  • Assessing and Improving Management
    Engels, Y.
  • Developing a framework of and quality indicators for general practice management in Europe
    Engels, Y.; Campbell, S.; Dautzenberg, M.; van den Hombergh, P.; Brinkmann, H.; Szecsenyi, J.; Falcoff, H.; Seuntjens, L.; Kuenzi, B.R.G.
  • Globalisation and the challenges to health systems
    Frenk, J.; Gomez‐Dantes, O.
  • Continuous Quality Improvement in Family Practice: Feasibility, Effectiveness and Assessment
    Geboers, H.
  • Your Contract, Your Future
    General Practitioner Committee
  • Quality Management in Primary Care: European Practice Assessment
    Grol, R.; Dautzenberg, M.; Brinkmann, H.
  • European Primary Care: Publication No. 2004/20E
    Health Council of The Netherlands
  • Cross‐border issues in the provision of health services: are we moving towards a European Health Policy?
    Kanavos, P.G.; McKee, M.
  • Measuring Globalization
    Kearny, A.T.
  • Slovak patients use health services less since charges were imposed
    Krosnar, K.
  • RCGP quality team development programme: an illuminative evaluation
    Macfarlane, F.; Greenhalgh, T.; Schofield, T.; Desombre, T.
  • Process vs outcome indicators in the assessment of quality in health care
    Mant, J.
  • Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science
    Miller, W.L.; McDaniel, R.R.; Crabtree, B.F.; Stange, K.C.
  • Improving safety on the front lines: the role of clinical microsystems
    Mohr, J.J.; Batalden, P.B.
  • Is a European healthcare policy emerging?
    Mossialos, E.; McKee, M.
  • Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high performing front‐line clinical units
    Nelson, E.; Batalden, P.B.; Huber, T.P.; Mohr, J.J.; Godfrey, M.M.; Headrick, L.A.; Wasson, J.H.
  • A Comparative Analysis of 29 Countries
    OECD Health Data
  • Organisational change theory and the use of indicators in general practice
    Rhydderch, M.; Elwyn, G.; Marshall, M.; Grol, R.
  • Organizational assessment in general practice: a systematic review and implications for quality improvement
    Rhydderch, M.; Edwards, A.; Engels, Y.; Marshall, M.; Elwyn, G.; van den Hombergh, P.; Grol, R.
  • Entry Standards for General Practice
    Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP)
  • Aiming for Excellence: An Assessment Tool for General Practice
    Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZGP)
  • The advantages and disadvantages of process‐based measures of health care quality
    Rubin, H.R.; Pronovost, P.; Diette, G.B.
  • External assessment of health care
    Shaw, C.
  • Dutch government introduces swingeing cuts to health spending
    Sheldon, T.
  • EU patients are entitled to primary care in any member country
    Sheldon, T.
  • New contract for general practitioners
    Shelkelle, P.
  • Primary Care. Concept, Evaluation and Policy
    Starfield, B.
  • Germany at centre of rationing row as budget in crisis
    Tuffs, A.
  • Germany's new charging system has mixed results
    Tuffs, A.
  • Germany sets up quality control institute for health care
    Tuffs, A.
  • Explaining development and change in organizations
    van de Ven, A.H.; Scott‐Poole, M.
  • Practice Visits: Assessing and Improving Management in General Practice
    van den Hombergh, P.
  • Organizing Cardiovascular Preventive Care in General Practice
    van Drenth, B.
  • Accreditation in primary care
    Walshe, K.; Walsh, N.
  • Healthcare Systems in Transition: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
    WHO
  • Healthcare Systems in Transition: Switzerland
    WHO
  • Healthcare Systems in Transition: Slovenia
    WHO
  • Healthcare Systems in Transition: The Netherlands
    WHO