Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Ferlie, L. Ashburner, L. Fitzgerald, A. Pettigrew (1996)
The New Public Management in Action
L. Schapiro (1960)
The Communist Party of the Soviet Union
S. Reichert (2010)
The intended and unintended effects of the Bologna reformsHigher Education Management and Policy, 22
Y. Bangura, G. Larbi (2006)
Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Capacity Challenges to Improve Services
Nick Manning (2001)
The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing CountriesInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 67
P. Dutil, Cosmo Howard, J. Langford, J. Roy (2010)
The Service State: Rhetoric, Reality and Promise
C. Hood (1991)
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONSPublic Administration, 69
W. Drechsler (2010)
The Re-Emergence of “Weberian” Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective, 6
L. Scott (2014)
"Digging Deep": Self-Study as a Reflexive Approach to Improving My Practice as an Artist, Researcher and TeacherPerspectives in Education, 32
C. Pollitt, G. Bouckaert (2004)
Public Management Reform: A Comparative AnalysisOUP Catalogue
F. Keller (2008)
Nomaden des wissenschaftlichen Feldes : Über die neue Geometrie des Wissens und die Kunst des Navigierens
S. Heyneman, K. Anderson, N. Nuraliyeva (2007)
The Cost of Corruption in Higher EducationComparative Education Review, 52
Virginia Navarro (2005)
Constructing a Teacher of Qualitative Methods: A ReflectionInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8
P. Altbach, Liz Reisberg, Laura Rumbley (2010)
Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution: A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education
Liudvika Leisytë, D. Kizniene (2006)
New Public Management in Lithuania's Higher EducationHigher Education Policy, 19
S. Stech (2011)
The Bologna Process as a New Public Management Tool in Higher Education, 2
K. Darden (2008)
The Integrity of Corrupt States: Graft as an Informal State InstitutionPolitics & Society, 36
I. Bleiklie, Svein Michelsen (2013)
Comparing HE policies in EuropeHigher Education, 65
P. Aucoin (1990)
Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and PendulumsGovernance, 3
Elizabeth Oldland (2011)
Transition from clinical manager to university lecturer: a self-reflective case studyHigher Education Research & Development, 30
Moldiyar Yergebekov, Zhanar Temirbekova (2012)
The Bologna Process and Problems in Higher Education System of KazakhstanProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47
M. Keech (2016)
Policy and Management
Colin Knox (2008)
Kazakhstan: modernizing government in the context of political inertiaInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 74
Sowaribi Tolofari (2005)
New Public Management and EducationPolicy Futures in Education, 3
J. Pakulski (1986)
Legitimacy and Mass Compliance: Reflections on Max Weber and Soviet-Type SocietiesBritish Journal of Political Science, 16
Allen Schick (1998)
Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's ReformsWorld Bank Research Observer, 13
A. Sarker (2006)
New public management in developing countriesInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 19
Purpose – Since the collapse of the USSR, former Soviet republics have embarked on public service modernization, in most instances drawing on internationally dominant new public management (NPM) principles. Are post-Soviet republics ready for these administrative prescriptions? The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This paper discusses Kazakhstan’s experience with the implementation of NPM through a qualitative case study of the country’s adoption of the European Bologna higher education reforms. Findings – While implementation of the NPM-inspired Bologna program has produced significant achievements, there are also gaps and shortcomings. These are due to a remnant Soviet administrative practices including strong control by educational ministries, as well as incompatible organizational cultures and a tendency toward superficial formalism in the implementation process. Research limitations/implications – NPM tends to be introduced in a top-down fashion as a taken-for-granted component of state transformation, without sufficient attention to the capacities, cultures and systems required for effective and accountable performance-driven administrative reform. Originality/value – Kazakhstan’s experience provides crucial insights into the governance structures, professional cultures and managerial capacities required for successful implementation of NPM in post-Soviet states.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.