Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Are high-fit CSR programs always better? The effects of corporate reputation and CSR fit on stakeholder responses

Are high-fit CSR programs always better? The effects of corporate reputation and CSR fit on... The purpose of this paper is to examine how corporate reputation interacts with corporate social responsibility (CSR) fit and affects stakeholders’ skeptical attribution (SA) of CSR motives, as well as their attitudes, supportive communication intent and purchase intent. This study proposes that a high-fit CSR program does not necessarily engender more favorable outcomes, nor does it stimulate SA. The study proposes the effects of CSR fit differ by corporate reputation. For bad-reputation companies, low-fit is anticipated to generate more desirable CSR outcomes than high-fit initiatives.Design/methodology/approachTwo experiments were conducted. The first experiment employed a randomized 2 (CSR fit: high fit vs low fit) × 2 (good reputation vs bad reputation) × 2 (Industry: food retailing and insurance) full factorial design to examine the suggested hypotheses. The second study employed a randomized 2 (CSR fit: high fit vs low fit) × 2 (good reputation vs bad reputation) full factorial design with consumer samples to replicate the conceptual relationships among variables in the first study.FindingsWhile reputation plays a dominant role in influencing stakeholders’ CSR-related responses across both CSR fit situations, a SA partially mediates the relationship between reputation and stakeholder reactions. CSR fit interacts with reputation, and influences the partial mediation process through SA; under a bad reputation condition, low-fit CSR engenders less SA and results in better stakeholder reactions. A similar tendency was found with supportive communication intent and purchase intent. High-fit CSR initiatives by a negative reputation company engendered the weakest supportive intent and purchase intent. For a reputable company, across both CSR fits, respondents displayed generally very positive attitudes toward, greater intent to support, and intent to purchase from the company.Originality/valueThe study findings provide useful and empirically supported logical explanations of why high-fit CSR programs sometimes cause backlash effects, despite the general consensus that such initiatives generate positive outcomes. This study offers an alternative and more relevant perspective to conceptualize the complexity of anticipating CSR outcomes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Corporate Communications: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Are high-fit CSR programs always better? The effects of corporate reputation and CSR fit on stakeholder responses

Download PDF
28 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/are-high-fit-csr-programs-always-better-the-effects-of-corporate-X7ErpkKZZd
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1356-3289
DOI
10.1108/ccij-05-2018-0061
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine how corporate reputation interacts with corporate social responsibility (CSR) fit and affects stakeholders’ skeptical attribution (SA) of CSR motives, as well as their attitudes, supportive communication intent and purchase intent. This study proposes that a high-fit CSR program does not necessarily engender more favorable outcomes, nor does it stimulate SA. The study proposes the effects of CSR fit differ by corporate reputation. For bad-reputation companies, low-fit is anticipated to generate more desirable CSR outcomes than high-fit initiatives.Design/methodology/approachTwo experiments were conducted. The first experiment employed a randomized 2 (CSR fit: high fit vs low fit) × 2 (good reputation vs bad reputation) × 2 (Industry: food retailing and insurance) full factorial design to examine the suggested hypotheses. The second study employed a randomized 2 (CSR fit: high fit vs low fit) × 2 (good reputation vs bad reputation) full factorial design with consumer samples to replicate the conceptual relationships among variables in the first study.FindingsWhile reputation plays a dominant role in influencing stakeholders’ CSR-related responses across both CSR fit situations, a SA partially mediates the relationship between reputation and stakeholder reactions. CSR fit interacts with reputation, and influences the partial mediation process through SA; under a bad reputation condition, low-fit CSR engenders less SA and results in better stakeholder reactions. A similar tendency was found with supportive communication intent and purchase intent. High-fit CSR initiatives by a negative reputation company engendered the weakest supportive intent and purchase intent. For a reputable company, across both CSR fits, respondents displayed generally very positive attitudes toward, greater intent to support, and intent to purchase from the company.Originality/valueThe study findings provide useful and empirically supported logical explanations of why high-fit CSR programs sometimes cause backlash effects, despite the general consensus that such initiatives generate positive outcomes. This study offers an alternative and more relevant perspective to conceptualize the complexity of anticipating CSR outcomes.

Journal

Corporate Communications: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 31, 2019

Keywords: CSR; Reputation; Fit; CSR outcomes; Reverse image transfer

References

  • Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation: a global perspective
    Aksak, E.O.; Ferguson, M.A.; Duman, S.A.
  • Alliances between brands and social causes: the influence of company credibility on social responsibility image
    Alcañiz, E.B.; Cáceres, R.C.; Pérez, R.C.
  • A spreading activation theory of memory
    Anderson, J.R.
  • Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving
    Bae, J.; Cameron, G.T.
  • The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another?
    Barone, M.J.; Miyazaki, A.D.; Taylor, K.A.
  • The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior
    Becker-Olsen, K.L.; Cudmore, B.A.; Hill, R.P.
  • Public relations leadership in corporate social responsiblity
    Benn, S.; Todd, L.R.; Pendleton, J.
  • Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives
    Bhattacharya, C.B.; Korschun, D.; Sen, S.
  • Why did he do it? Attribution of obedience and the phenomenon of dispositional bias
    Bierbrauer, G.N.
  • The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses
    Brown, T.; Dacin, P.
  • Savings in relearning: on the formation of behavior-based trait associations and inferences
    Carlston, D.; Skowronski, J.J.; Sparks, C.
  • Brand stereotyping and image transfer in concurrent sponsorships
    Carrillat, F.; Solomon, P.J.; d’Astous, A.
  • Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study
    Cole, M.S.; Walter, F.; Bruch, H.
  • Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: a dual-process model
    David, P.; Kline, S.; Dai, Y.
  • Consumer perception of corporate donations: effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation
    Dean, D.H.
  • Company advertising with a social dimension: the role of noneconomic criteria
    Drumwright, M.E.
  • Maximizing returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication
    Du, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B.; Sen, S.
  • Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?
    Ellen, P.S.; Mohr, L.A.; Webb, D.J.
  • Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs
    Ellen, P.S.; Webb, D.J.; Mohr, L.A.
  • Creating a baseline for corporate CSR spend on global education initiatives
  • Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias
    Fein, S.; Hilton, J.L.; Miller, D.T.
  • What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy
    Fombrun, C.J.; Shanley, M.
  • The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation
    Fombrun, C.J.; Gardberg, N.A.; Sever, J.W.
  • Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: testing hypotheses from economics of information
    Ford, G.T.; Smith, D.B.; Swasy, J.L.
  • When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism
    Forehand, M.R.; Grier, S.
  • A model of image creation and image transfer in event sponsorship
    Gwinner, K.
  • Building brand image through event sponsorship: the role of image transfer
    Gwinner, K.; Eaton, J.
  • Image transfer in corporate event sponsorship: assessing the impact of team identification and event-sponsor fit
    Gwinner, K.; Larson, B.; Swanson, S.R.
  • Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing
    Hoeffler, S.; Keller, K.L.
  • Public engagement in supportive communication behaviors toward an organization: effects of relational satisfaction and organizational reputation in public relations management
    Hong, S.; Yang, S.-U.
  • The rocky road from acts to dispositions
    Jones, E.E.
  • Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity
    Keller, K.L.
  • Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: the synergistic model of corporate communication strategy
    Kim, S.
  • Consumer responses to the food industry’s proactive and passive environmental CSR, factoring in price as CSR tradeoff
    Kim, Y.
  • College students’ perception of Philip Morris’s tobacco-related smoking prevention and tobacco-unrelated social responsibility
    Kim, Y.; Choi, Y.
  • Corporate social responsibility: impact of perceived motives and prior reputation on effects of fit of CSR programs
    Kim, Y.; Ferguson, M.A.
  • Strategic implications of attitude toward the Ad in leveraging event sponsorships
    Kinney, L.; McDaniel, S.R.
  • Selecting the right cause partners for the right reasons: the role of importance and fit in cause-brand alliances
    Lafferty, B.A.
  • The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: the mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation
    Lai, C.S.; Chiu, C.J.; Yang, C.F.; Pai, D.C.
  • Public relations and CSR: some issues arising
    L’Etang, J.
  • An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in an advertising pretesting context
    MacKenzie, S.B.; Lutz, R.J.
  • Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry
    Maloni, M.; Brown, E.
  • Understanding sponsorship effects
    Meenaghan, T.
  • Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation
    Meyers-Levy, J.; Tybout, A.M.
  • Behavioral study of obedience
    Milgram, S.
  • Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services
    Nguyen, N.; Leblanc, G.
  • SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
    Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F.
  • Attitude strength and resistance processes
    Pomerantz, E.M.; Chaiken, S.; Tordesillas, R.S.
  • The hidden factors behind sponsorship and image transfer among sponsors and events
    Prendergast, G.; Paliwal, A.; Mazodier, M.
  • Match game: linking sponsorship congruence with communication outcomes
    Prendergast, G.P.; Poon, D.; West, D.
  • Congruence effects in sponsorship: the mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive
    Rifon, N.; Choi, S.; Trimble, C.; Li, H.
  • Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
    Roberts, P.W.; Dowling, G.R.
  • Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: a survey of the literature
    Sabate, J.M.; Puente, E.Q.
  • The creation of value through corporate reputation
    Sánchez, J.L.F.; Sotorrío, L.L.
  • The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment
    Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B.; Korschun, D.
  • The effect of bad reputation: the occurrence of crisis, corporate social responsibility, and perceptions of hypocrisy and attitudes toward a company
    Shim, K.; Yang, S.U.
  • Does ethical orientation matter? Determinants of public reaction to CSR communication
    Shim, K.; Chung, M.; Kim, Y.
  • Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes
    Simonin, B.L.; Ruth, J.A.
  • The new corporate philanthropy
    Smith, C.
  • Determinants of sports sponsorship response
    Speed, R.; Thompson, P.
  • Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell
    Strahilevitz, M.; Myers, J.G.
  • Does corporate sponsorship of a socially-oriented message make a difference? An investigation of the effects of sponsorship identity on responses to an anti-drinking and driving message
    Szykman, L.R.; Bloom, P.N.; Blazing, J.
  • The overarching effects of ethical reputation regardless of CSR cause fit and information source
    Tao, W.; Ferguson, M.A.
  • The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent, and brand beliefs
    Till, B.D.; Busler, M.
  • The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences
    Todorov, A.; Uleman, J.S.
  • Cause related marketing: a co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy
    Varadarajan, P.R.; Menon, A.
  • Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions
    Wagner, T.; Lutz, R.J.; Weitz, B.A.
  • A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned
    Webb, D.J.; Mohr, L.A.
  • On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation
    Wojciske, B.; Bazinska, R.; Jaworski, M.
  • Decomposing organizational reputation: the effects of organization-public relationship outcomes on cognitive representations of organisations and evaluations of organisational performance
    Yang, S.-U.; Grunig, J.E.
  • The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations
    Yoon, Y.; Giirhan-Canli, Z.; Schwarz, N.