Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Are computers better than smartphones for web survey responses?

Are computers better than smartphones for web survey responses? The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of smartphones and computers as web survey entry response devices on the quality of responses in different question formats and across different survey invitations delivery modes. The respondents’ preference of device and the response immediacy were also compared.Design/methodology/approachTwo field experiments were conducted with a cluster sampling and a census of all students in a public university in the USA.FindingsDevice effect on response quality was only found when using computer-aided self-interviews, but not in e-mail delivered web surveys. Even though the computer was the preferred device, but the smartphone’s immediate response was significantly higher than the computer.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was restricted to college students who are more proficient users of smartphones and have high access to computers. But the direct comparison in the two studies using the same population increases the internal validity of the study comparing different web survey delivery modes.Practical implicationsBecause of the minor differences in device on response quality, researchers can consider using more smartphones for field work such as computer-aided self-interviews to complement e-mail delivered surveys.Originality/valueThis is the first study that compares the response device effects of computer-aided self-interviews and e-mailed delivered web surveys. Because web surveys are increasingly used and various devices are being used to collect data, how respondents behave in different devices and the strengths and weaknesses of different methods of delivery survey help researchers to improve data quality and develop effective web survey delivery and participant recruitment. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Online Information Review Emerald Publishing

Are computers better than smartphones for web survey responses?

Ha, Louisa S.; Zhang, Chenjie
Online Information Review , Volume 43 (3): 19 – May 17, 2019
Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/are-computers-better-than-smartphones-for-web-survey-responses-Rkz8uP0EmN
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1468-4527
DOI
10.1108/oir-11-2017-0322
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of smartphones and computers as web survey entry response devices on the quality of responses in different question formats and across different survey invitations delivery modes. The respondents’ preference of device and the response immediacy were also compared.Design/methodology/approachTwo field experiments were conducted with a cluster sampling and a census of all students in a public university in the USA.FindingsDevice effect on response quality was only found when using computer-aided self-interviews, but not in e-mail delivered web surveys. Even though the computer was the preferred device, but the smartphone’s immediate response was significantly higher than the computer.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample was restricted to college students who are more proficient users of smartphones and have high access to computers. But the direct comparison in the two studies using the same population increases the internal validity of the study comparing different web survey delivery modes.Practical implicationsBecause of the minor differences in device on response quality, researchers can consider using more smartphones for field work such as computer-aided self-interviews to complement e-mail delivered surveys.Originality/valueThis is the first study that compares the response device effects of computer-aided self-interviews and e-mailed delivered web surveys. Because web surveys are increasingly used and various devices are being used to collect data, how respondents behave in different devices and the strengths and weaknesses of different methods of delivery survey help researchers to improve data quality and develop effective web survey delivery and participant recruitment.

Journal

Online Information Review – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 17, 2019

Keywords: Smartphones; Computer-aided self-interviews; Mobile survey; Survey response quality; Web survey

References

  • Effects of mobile versus PC web on survey data quality: a crossover experiment in a probability web panel
    Antoun, C.; Couper, M.P.; Conrad, F.G.
  • Using the theory of satisficing to evaluate the quality of survey data
    Barge, S.; Gehlbach, H.
  • Total survey error: design, implementation and evaluation
    Biemer, P.
  • Making mobile browser surveys smarter: results from a randomized experiment comparing online surveys completed via computer or smartphone
    Buskirk, T.D.; Andrus, C.H.
  • From mixed-mode to multiple devices – web surveys, smartphone surveys and apps: has the respondent gone ahead of us in answering surveys?
    Callegaro, M.
  • Shipper/carrier interactions data collection: Web-based Respondent Customized Stated Preference (WRCSP) survey
    Cavalcante, R.A.; Roorda, M.J.; Zmud, J.; Lee-Gosselin, M.; Munizaga, M.; Carrasco, J.A.
  • What’s the best time to send a survey?
  • Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches
    Couper, M.P.
  • The future of modes of data collection
    Couper, M.P.
  • Why do web surveys take longer on smartphones?
    Couper, M.P.; Peterson, G.J.
  • Improving response rates and questionnaire design for mobile web surveys
    De-Bruijne, M.; Wijnant, A.
  • It’s all about timing-when to send your survey email invites?
  • An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys
    Fricker, S.; Galesic, M.; Tourangeau, R.; Yan, T.
  • Explaining interview duration in web surveys: a multilevel approach
    Gummer, T.; Roßmann, J.
  • A web survey analysis of subjective well-being
    Guzi, M.; de Pedraza Garcia, P.
  • Use of survey research in top mass communication journals 2001–2010 and the total survey error paradigm
    Ha, L.; Hu, X.; Fang, L.; Henize, S.; Park, S.; Stana, A.; Zhang, X.
  • Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a web survey
    Heerwegh, D.
  • Item non-response of different question types and formats in mixed-mode surveys: a case study of a public broadcasting TV station’s members
    Jiang, W.; Ha, L.; Abuljadail, M.; Alsulaiman, S.A.
  • Measuring usage concentration of smartphone applications: selective repertoire in a marketplace of choices
    Jung, J.; Kim, Y.; Chan-Olmsted, S.
  • Real-world eye-tracking in face-to-face and web modes
    Kaminska, O.; Foulsham, T.
  • The influence of answer box format on response behavior on list-style open-ended questions
    Keusch, F.
  • Web-based versus paper-based data collection for the evaluation of teaching activity: empirical evidence from a case study
    Lalla, M.; Ferrari, D.
  • Living with smartphones: does completion device affect survey response?
    Lambert, A.D.; Miller, A.L.
  • Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys
    Link, M.W.; Murphy, J.; Schober, M.F.; Buskirk, T.D.; Childs, J.H.; Tesfaye, C.L.
  • Data collection mode differences between national face-to-face and web surveys on gender inequality and discrimination questions
    Liu, M.
  • The use of PCs, smartphones, and tablets in a probability-based panel survey: effects on survey measurement error
    Lugtig, P.; Toepoel, V.
  • Data quality in PC and mobile web surveys
    Mavletova, A.
  • Sensitive topics in PC web and mobile web surveys: is there a difference?
    Mavletova, A.; Couper, M.P.
  • Specific situations or specific people? How do extrinsic and intrinsic factors interact in cultivation research?
    Meltzer, C.E.; Schnauber, A.
  • Problems and prospects in survey research
    Moy, P.; Murphy, J.
  • Experiments in mobile survey design: similarities to other modes and unique considerations
    Peytchev, A.; Hill, C.A.
  • An experiment comparing grids and item-by-item formats in web surveys completed through PCs and smartphones
    Revilla, M.; Toninelli, D.; Ochoa, C.
  • The implications of the survey method for measuring cultivation effects
    Schrum, L.J.
  • Why do respondents break off web surveys and does it matter? Results from four follow-up surveys
    Steinbrecher, M.; Romann, J.; Blumenstiel, J.E.
  • How many days does it take for respondents to respond to your survey?
  • Response styles in survey research: a literature review of antecedents, consequences, and remedies
    Van Vaerengergh, Y.; Thomas, T.D.
  • Are demographics adequate controls for cell-phone-only coverage bias in mass communication research?
    Watson, B.R.; Zamith, R.; Cavanah, C.; Lewis, S.C.