Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
M. Turco, M. Calvano, E. Giovannini (2019)
DATA MODELING FOR MUSEUM COLLECTIONSThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
L. Riazuelo, Moritz Tenorth, D. Marco, M. Salas, Dorian Gálvez-López, Lorenz Mösenlechner, Lars Kunze, M. Beetz, J. Tardós, L. Montano, J. Montiel (2015)
RoboEarth Semantic Mapping: A Cloud Enabled Knowledge-Based ApproachIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 12
M. Doerr (2005)
The CIDOC CRM, an Ontological Approach to Schema Heterogeneity
Lamia Belouaer, M. Bouzid, A. Mouaddib (2010)
Ontology Based Spatial Planning for Human-Robot Interaction2010 17th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning
V. Charles, Jornada EuropeanaLocal (2010)
The Europeana Data Model (EDM)
Abdolreza Hajmoosaei, Petra Skoric (2016)
Museum Ontology-Based Metadata2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)
J. Crespo, J. Castillo, Óscar Mozos, R. Barber (2020)
Semantic Information for Robot Navigation: A SurveyApplied Sciences
C. Schlenoff, S. Foufou, S. Balakirsky (2012)
Performance evaluation of robotic knowledge representation (PERK)
A. Burton-Jones, V. Storey, V. Sugumaran, P. Ahluwalia (2005)
A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologiesData Knowl. Eng., 55
R. Porzel, R. Malaka
A Task-based Approach for Ontology Evaluation
L. Paull, G. Séverac, G. Raffo, J. Angel, H. Boley, P. Durst, W. Gray, M. Habib, Bao Nguyen, S. Ragavan, G. SajadSaeedi, R. Sanz, M. Seto, Aleksandar Stefanovski, M. Trentini, Howard Li (2012)
Towards an Ontology for Autonomous Robots2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
G. Lakemeyer, B. Nebel (2003)
Exploring artificial intelligence in the new millennium
Gabriela Roldán-Molina, J. Méndez, I. Yevseyeva, Vitor Basto-Fernandes (2020)
Ontology Fixing by Using Software Engineering TechnologyApplied Sciences
B. Sathiya, T. Geetha (2019)
A review on semantic similarity measures for ontologyJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36
M. Cornejo-Lupa, Regina Ticona-Herrera, Yudith Cardinale, D. Barrios-Aranibar (2020)
A Survey of Ontologies for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping in Mobile RobotsACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53
Hao Wu, G. Tian, Yan Li, F. Zhou, Peng Duan (2014)
Spatial semantic hybrid map building and application of mobile service robotRobotics Auton. Syst., 62
Guy Burroughes, Yang Gao (2016)
Ontology-Based Self-Reconfiguring Guidance, Navigation, and Control for Planetary RoversJ. Aerosp. Inf. Syst., 13
Weeraphan Chanhom, Chutiporn Anutariya (2019)
TOMS: A Linked Open Data System for Collaboration and Distribution of Cultural Heritage Artifact Collections of National Museums in ThailandNew Generation Computing, 37
S. Dhouib, N. Lac, J. Farges, S. Gérard, Miniar Hemaissia-Jeannin, Juan Lahera-Perez, S. Millet, B. Patin, Serge Stinckwich (2011)
Control Architecture Concepts and Properties of an Ontology Devoted to Exchanges in Mobile Robotics
Élodie Thiéblin, Ollivier Haemmerlé, Nathalie Hernandez, C. Trojahn (2020)
Survey on complex ontology matchingSemantic Web, 11
Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, IEEE
Cynthia Matuszek, J. Cabral, M. Witbrock, J. DeOliveira (2006)
An Introduction to the Syntax and Content of Cyc
ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Doo Chang, Gun Cho, Y. Choi (2020)
Ontology-based knowledge model for human-robot interactive servicesProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Yudith Cardinale, M. Cornejo-Lupa, Regina Ticona-Herrera, D. Barrios-Aranibar (2020)
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM OntologiesProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
I. Suh, G. Lim, Wonil Hwang, H. Suh, Jung-Hwa Choi, Youngtack Park (2007)
Ontology-based multi-layered robot knowledge framework (OMRKF) for robot intelligence2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
A. Maedche, Steffen Staab (2002)
Measuring Similarity between Ontologies
Judson Bandeira, I. Bittencourt, P. Espinheira, Seiji Isotani (2016)
FOCA: A Methodology for Ontology EvaluationArXiv, abs/1612.03353
G. Drakopoulos, Yorghos Voutos, Phivos Mylonas (2020)
Recent Advances On Ontology Similarity Metrics: A Survey2020 5th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM)
M. Eid, R. Liscano, Abdulmotaleb Saddik (2007)
A Universal Ontology for Sensor Networks Data2007 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications
H. Hlomani, D. Stacey (2014)
Approaches , methods , metrics , measures , and subjectivity in ontology evaluation : A survey
Birger Lantow (2016)
OntoMetrics: Application of On-line Ontology Metric Calculation
Pierre Maillot, Carlos Bobed (2018)
Measuring structural similarity between RDF graphsProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
E. Hyvönen, E. Mäkelä, Mirva Salminen, Arttu Valo, Kim Viljanen, Samppa Saarela, M. Junnila, Suvi Kettula (2005)
MuseumFinland - Finnish museums on the semantic webJ. Web Semant., 3
M. Addis, M. Boniface, S. Goodall, P. Grimwood, Sanghee Kim, P. Lewis, K. Martinez, A. Stevenson (2003)
SCULPTEUR: Towards a New Paradigm for Multimedia Museum Information Handling
Cristiana Araújo, R. Martini, P. Henriques, J. Almeida (2018)
Annotated Documents and Expanded CIDOC-CRM Ontology in the Automatic Construction of a Virtual Museum
Sergey Marchenkov, A. Vdovenko, O. Petrina, D. Korzun (2017)
Smart museum of everyday life history in Petrozavodsk State University: Software design and implementation of the semantic layer2017 21st Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)
C. Schlenoff, E. Messina (2005)
A robot ontology for urban search and rescue
Michael Cashmore, M. Fox, D. Long, D. Magazzeni, Bram Ridder, Arnau Carrera, N. Palomeras, N. Hurtós, M. Carreras (2015)
ROSPlan: Planning in the Robot Operating System
Moritz Tenorth, M. Beetz (2009)
KNOWROB — knowledge processing for autonomous personal robots2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Xingsi Xue, Chaofan Yang, Chao Jiang, Pei-wei Tsai, Guojun Mao, Hai Zhu (2021)
Optimizing Ontology Alignment through Linkage Learning on Entity CorrespondencesComplex., 2021
Maria Biagetti (2017)
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC ONTOLOGIES
P. Mulholland, A. Wolff, T. Collins (2012)
Curate and Storyspace: An Ontology and Web-Based Environment for Describing Curatorial Narratives
Jan Keil, Sirko Schindler (2018)
Comparison and evaluation of ontologies for units of measurementSemantic Web, 10
M. Poveda-Villalón, M. Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez (2012)
Validating Ontologies with OOPS!
J. Brank, M. Grobelnik (2005)
A SURVEY OF ONTOLOGY EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
V. Rey (2013)
A positioning ontology for C-SLAM
Stefan Zander, Nadia Ahmed, Matthias Frank (2016)
A Survey about the Usage of Semantic Technologies for the Description of Robotic Components and Capabilities
Astrid Duque-Ramos, J. Fernández-breis, R. Stevens, Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles (2011)
OQuaRE: A SQuaRE-based Approach for Evaluating the Quality of OntologiesJ. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol., 43
Nuno Freire, D. Proença (2020)
RDF Reasoning on Large Ontologies: A Study on Cultural Heritage and WikidataArtificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, 583
Ningsheng Jian, Wei Hu, Gong Cheng, Yuzhong Qu (2005)
FalconAO: Aligning Ontologies with Falcon
Tingqi Wang, Qijun Chen (2011)
Object semantic map representation for indoor mobile robotsProceedings 2011 International Conference on System Science and Engineering
M. Cornejo-Lupa, Regina Ticona-Herrera, Yudith Cardinale, D. Barrios-Aranibar (2020)
A categorization of simultaneous localization and mapping knowledge for mobile robotsProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
J. Carbonera, S. Fiorini, Edson Silva, V. Jorge, Mara Abel, R. Madhavan, A. Locoro, P. Gonçalves, T. Haidegger, Marcos Barreto, C. Schlenoff (2013)
Defining positioning in a core ontology for robotics2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Edson Silva, J. Carbonera, S. Fiorini, V. Jorge, Mara Abel, R. Madhavan, A. Locoro, P. Gonçalves, Marcos Barreto, M. Habib, A. Chibani, S. Gérard, Y. Amirat, C. Schlenoff (2013)
Towards a core ontology for robotics and automationRobotics Auton. Syst., 61
A. Ulanov, G. Shevlyakov, Nikolay Lyubomishchenko, P. Mehra, Vladimir Polutin (2010)
Monte Carlo Study of Taxonomy Evaluation2010 Workshops on Database and Expert Systems Applications
C. Brewster, Harith Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, Y. Wilks (2004)
Data Driven Ontology Evaluation
Jan Keil (2020)
ABECTO: An ABox Evaluation and Comparison Tool for Ontologies
Nuno Freire, S. Valk (2019)
Automated interpretability of linked data ontologies: : an evaluation within the cultural heritage domain2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Andrzej Pronobis, P. Jensfelt (2011)
Multi-modal Semantic Mapping
Alexander Gala, Yudith Cardinale, Irvin Dongo, Regina Ticona-Herrera (2021)
Towards an ontology for urban tourismProceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Henning Deeken, T. Wiemann, J. Hertzberg (2018)
Grounding semantic maps in spatial databasesRobotics Auton. Syst., 105
G. Lim, I. Suh, H. Suh (2011)
Ontology-Based Unified Robot Knowledge for Service Robots in Indoor EnvironmentsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41
M. Doerr, M. Theodoridou (2014)
CRMdig an extension of CIDOC-CRM to support provenance metadata
Jinie Pak, Lina Zhou (2009)
A Framework for Ontology Evaluation
Aditya Sundararajan, A. Sarwat, Alexander Pons (2019)
A Survey on Modality Characteristics, Performance Evaluation Metrics, and Security for Traditional and Wearable Biometric SystemsACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52
Xiaolei Sun, Yu Zhang, J. Chen (2019)
High-Level Smart Decision Making of a Robot Based on Ontology in a Search and Rescue ScenarioFuture Internet, 11
F. Ramos, A. Vázquez, Raúl Fernández, Alberto Alarcos (2018)
Ontology based design, control and programming of modular robotsIntegr. Comput. Aided Eng., 25
(2015)
Finish thesaurus and ontology service
Ruijiao Li, Lai Wei, Dongbing Gu, Huosheng Hu, K. Mcdonald-Maier (2013)
Multi-layered map based navigation and interaction for an intelligent wheelchair2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO)
Óscar Mozos, P. Jensfelt, H. Zender, G. Kruijff, W. Burgard (2007)
From labels to semantics: an integrated system for conceptual spatial representations of indoor environments for mobile robots
Melinda McDaniel, V. Storey (2019)
Evaluating Domain OntologiesACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52
Samir Tartir, I. Arpinar, Michael Moore, A. Sheth, Boanerges Aleman-Meza (2005)
OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis
Auriol Degbelo (2017)
A Snapshot of Ontology Evaluation Criteria and StrategiesProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems
This study aims to the OQuaRE quality model to the developed methodology.Design/methodology/approachOntologies are formal, well-defined and flexible representations of knowledge related to a specific domain. They provide the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. Then, it is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for the specific needs of users/developers. As the emerging development of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them.FindingsIn a previous study, the authors propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural and Domain Knowledge levels, considering correctness and quality perspectives. As the evaluation methods of the proposal are based on a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain.Practical implicationsTo show the suitability of the proposal, the authors apply the methodological approach to conduct comparative studies of ontologies in two different domains, one in the robotic area, in particular for the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem; and the other one, in the cultural heritage domain. With these cases of study, the authors demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domains.Originality/valueUsing these metrics and the quality model from OQuaRE, the authors are incorporating a standard of software engineering at the quality validation into the Semantic Web.
International Journal of Web Information Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 6, 2021
Keywords: Ontologies; SLAM; Semantic web; Cultural heritage; Evaluation of ontologies
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.