Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Anti‐social behaviour: profiling the lives behind road rage

Anti‐social behaviour: profiling the lives behind road rage Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose that “social demarketing” campaigns need to recognize unique sub segments of individuals engaging in behaviours having substantial negative societal impacts. Design/methodology/approach – Volume segmentation and extremely frequent behaviour theory is applied to examining several unique sub segments among survey data ( n =6,393) of Americans not engaging and engaging in anti‐social behaviour (“giving‐the‐finger”) to other motorists while driving. Findings – Less than 2 percent of Americans are estimated to enact 40 percent of the total incidences of “giving‐the‐finger” to other motorists; three unique sub segments of the chronic anti‐social actors participate in different lifestyles (including media usage behaviours) and each has unique demographic profiles. Research limitations/implications – The study is based on two years of a national survey taken in one country and self‐reports only. The implications support the propositions of a general theory of extremely frequent consumption behaviour. Practical implications – Government demarcating programs are likely to increase in effectiveness through tailoring a few strategies, rather than one, to influence unique segments of chronic anti‐social actors. Originality/value – The paper provides individual‐level analysis of chronic anti‐social actors engaging in road‐rage related behaviours and compares them to one another as well as non‐equivalent comparison groups of actors not engaging in such behaviour; the paper describes the merits of experience frequency segmentation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Marketing Intelligence & Planning Emerald Publishing

Anti‐social behaviour: profiling the lives behind road rage

Marketing Intelligence & Planning , Volume 26 (5): 22 – Aug 1, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/anti-social-behaviour-profiling-the-lives-behind-road-rage-gX7Nq2Rxos
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0263-4503
DOI
10.1108/02634500810894316
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose that “social demarketing” campaigns need to recognize unique sub segments of individuals engaging in behaviours having substantial negative societal impacts. Design/methodology/approach – Volume segmentation and extremely frequent behaviour theory is applied to examining several unique sub segments among survey data ( n =6,393) of Americans not engaging and engaging in anti‐social behaviour (“giving‐the‐finger”) to other motorists while driving. Findings – Less than 2 percent of Americans are estimated to enact 40 percent of the total incidences of “giving‐the‐finger” to other motorists; three unique sub segments of the chronic anti‐social actors participate in different lifestyles (including media usage behaviours) and each has unique demographic profiles. Research limitations/implications – The study is based on two years of a national survey taken in one country and self‐reports only. The implications support the propositions of a general theory of extremely frequent consumption behaviour. Practical implications – Government demarcating programs are likely to increase in effectiveness through tailoring a few strategies, rather than one, to influence unique segments of chronic anti‐social actors. Originality/value – The paper provides individual‐level analysis of chronic anti‐social actors engaging in road‐rage related behaviours and compares them to one another as well as non‐equivalent comparison groups of actors not engaging in such behaviour; the paper describes the merits of experience frequency segmentation.

Journal

Marketing Intelligence & PlanningEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 1, 2008

Keywords: Drivers; Individual behaviour; Individual psychology; Individual conflict

There are no references for this article.