Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Sheth, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, S. Joosten, M. Rusinkiewicz, W. Scacchi, J. Wileden, A. Wolf (1996)
Report from the NSF workshop on workflow and process automation in information systemsSIGMOD Rec., 25
Robert Orfali, Dan Harkey (1997)
Client/Server programming with Java and Corba
N. Barghouti (1992)
Supporting cooperation in the Marvel process-centered SDE
D. Heimbigner (1992)
The ProcessWall: a process state server approach to process programming
I. Ben-Shaul, A. Cohen, O. Holder, Boris Lavva (1997)
HADAS: a network centric framework for interoperability programmingProceedings of CoopIS 97: 2nd IFCIS Conference on Cooperative Information Systems
I. Ben-Shaul, G. Kaiser (1996)
Integrating groupware activities into workflow management systemsProceedings of the Seventh Israeli Conference on Computer Systems and Software Engineering
M. Rusinkiewicz, A. Sheth (1995)
Specification and Execution of Transactional Workflows
G. Alonso, C. Mohan, R. Günthör, D. Agrawal, A. Abbadi, M. Kamath (1995)
Exotica/FMQM: A Persistent Message-Based Architecture for Distributed Workflow Management
C. Basile, S. Calanna, E. Nitto, A. Fuggetta, M. Gemo (1996)
Mechanisms and Policies for Federated PSEEs: Basic Concepts and Open Issues
D. Schwartz (1994)
Cooperating heterogeneous systems, 299
Rahim Ramezanian (1978)
Communicating sequential processesCommun. ACM, 21
Anthony Finkelsteiin, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh (1994)
Software process modelling and technology
C. Koomen (1991)
Calculus of Communicating Systems
The coupling of process‐centered environments (PCEs) with distributed object architectures like COM, CORBA and Java opens up an unprecedented range of possibilities in terms of automatic process management. The human factor is still the major component of the software process but its role is changing, as is the kind of support it needs. Focusing on the interactions between different distributed PCEs (heterogeneous federation), we present an Internet‐based framework for the definition and enactment of federated processes. A CSP‐like process definition language makes distribution problems transparent to the process designer while compiler and execution engines exploit Internet technology in order to map process specifications into the actual IT infrastructure. Different solutions are investigated for both the deployment of the enactment components and their interaction with local PCEs.
Internet Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1998
Keywords: Computer architectures; Computer languages; Decentralized computing; Internet; Process control
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.