Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jacques Barrette, L. Lemyre, Wayne Cornei, N. Beauregard (2007)
Organizational learning among senior public‐service executives: An empirical investigation of culture, decisional latitude and supportive communicationCanadian Public Administration-administration Publique Du Canada, 50
H. Schuman, S. Presser (1996)
Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context
Gary Templeton, B. Lewis, C. Snyder (2002)
Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning ConstructJournal of Management Information Systems, 19
G. Hult, O. Ferrell (1997)
Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: Construct and measurementJournal of Business Research, 40
N. Birdthistle
Small family businesses as learning organisations: an Irish study
M. Diefenbach, N. Weinstein, Joseph O'Reilly (1993)
Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility.Health education research, 8 2
Timothy Hinkin (1995)
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of OrganizationsJournal of Management, 21
H. Wold
Partial least squares
J.H.W. Boyd, R. Westfall, S.F. Stasch
Marketing Research, Text and Cases
A. Colman, C. Norris, Carolyn Preston (1997)
Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-Point and 7-Point ScalesPsychological Reports, 80
Gilbert Churchill (1979)
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 16
S. Komorita, W. Graham (1965)
Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 25
D. Alwin, J. Krosnick (1991)
The Reliability of Survey Attitude MeasurementSociological Methods & Research, 20
J. Gliem, R. Gliem (2003)
Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales
N.J. Birkett
Selecting the number of response categories for a Likert‐type scale
F. Andrews (1984)
Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling ApproachPublic Opinion Quarterly, 48
A.M. Colman, C.E. Norris, C.C. Preston
Comparing rating scales of different lengths: equivalence of scores from five‐point and seven‐point scales
Pilar Jerez-Gómez, J. Céspedes-Lorente, Ramón Valle-Cabrera (2005)
Organizational learning and compensation strategies: Evidence from the Spanish chemical industryHuman Resource Management, 44
Hari Bapuji, M. Crossan (2004)
From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning ResearchManagement Learning, 35
Wynne Chin (2009)
Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by
Ricardo Chiva, J. Alegre, R. Lapiedra (2007)
Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforceInternational Journal of Manpower, 28
Hongyi Sun, K. Ho, Wenbin Ni (2008)
The empirical relationship among Organisational Learning, Continuous Improvement and Performance ImprovementInternational Journal of Learning and Change, 3
G. Albaum (1997)
The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version.(product preference testing)
W.W. Chin
Overview of the PLS Method
R. Zinbarg, W. Revelle, Iftah Yovel, Wen Li (2005)
Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliabilityPsychometrika, 70
S. Bourke, J. Frampton
Assessing the quality of school life: some technical considerations
A. Dibella, E. Nevis, Janet Gould (1996)
Understanding Organizational Learning CapabilityJournal of Management Studies, 33
P.D. Leedy, J.E. Ormrod
Practical Research: Planning and Design
Baiyin Yang, Karen Watkins, V. Marsick (2004)
The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validationHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 15
D. Andrich (1978)
A binomial latent trait model for the study of Likert‐style attitude questionnairesBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31
L. Cronbach, P. Meehl (1955)
Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological bulletin, 52 4
R. Sitgreaves (1979)
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).Psyccritiques, 24
Michael Tippins, R. Sohi (2003)
IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?Strategic Management Journal, 24
W.M.K. Trochim
Research Methods Knowledge Base
J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black
Multivariate Data Analysis
E. Antonacopoulou (2006)
Learning-in-Practise: The Social Complexity of Learning in Working Life
Q. Raaijmakers (2000)
Adolescents' midpoint responses on Likert-type scale items: Neutral or missing values?International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12
P.E. Spector
Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction
C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research, 18
Ozgur Yeniay, Atilla Göktaş (2001)
A comparison of partial least squares regression with other prediction methodsQuality Engineering, 49
Carolyn Preston, A. Colman (2000)
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.Acta psychologica, 104 1
A. Gallagher, Martin Fellenz (1999)
Measurement Instruments as a Tool for Advancing Research in Organizational Learning
L. Lim, T. Laosirihongthong, Christopher Chan (2011)
A Case Study Of Learning In A Thai Manufacturing OrganizationJournal of Applied Business Research, 22
K. Vehkalahti, S. Puntanen, L. Tarkkonen (2006)
Estimation of reliability: a better alternative for Cronbach's alpha
Wynne Chin, Barbara Marcolin, P. Newsted (1996)
A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study
G. Rae (2008)
A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 61 Pt 2
Michael Matell, J. Jacoby (1971)
Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and ValidityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 31
H. Abdi
Regression
R.P. Bagozzi
The role of measurement in theory construction and hypothesis testing: toward a holistic model
J. Krosnick, L. Fabrigar (1997)
Designing Rating Scales for Effective Measurement in Surveys
R. Bagozzi (1981)
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A CommentJournal of Marketing Research, 18
(2003)
Examining the link between knowledge management, organizational learning and performance
J. Morrison, L. Olfman (1998)
Organizational MemoryProceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1
M. Easterby-Smith, Marjorie Lyles (2003)
Organizational learning and knowledge management: agendas for future research
R. Garland (1991)
The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable?
S. Goh, G. Richards (1997)
Benchmarking the learning capability of organizationsEuropean Management Journal, 15
S. Ramnarayan
Kindling learning process in organizations
F.L. Bookstein
Partial least squares: a dose‐response model for measurement in the behavioral and brain sciences
R. Finn (1972)
Effects of Some Variations in Rating Scale Characteristics on the Means and Reliabilities of RatingsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 32
D.F. Alwin, J.A. Krosnick
The reliability of survey attitude measurement: the influence of question and respondent attributes
S. Ramnarayan, T. Rao, Kuldeep Singh (1998)
Organization development : interventions and strategies
R. Zinbarg, W. Revelle, I. Yovel, W. Li
Cronbach's alpha, Revelle's beta and McDonald's Omega H: their relations with one another and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability
MOP
Web Site of Ministry of Power
R.A. Cummins, E. Gullone
Why we should not use five‐point Likert scales: the case for subjective quality of life measurement
Yu-ping Xie, R. Devellis (1992)
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.Contemporary Sociology, 21
Susana Dr, J. Peón, C. Ordás (2005)
Human Resource Practices, Organizational Learning and Business PerformanceHuman Resource Development International, 8
Constantine Kontoghiorghes, Susan Awbre, Pamela Feurig (2005)
Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performanceHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 16
E. McCaffrey
Learning Organisations in the WA Public Sector: An Empirical Study
T. Egan, Baiyin Yang, K. Bartlett (2004)
The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intentionHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 15
T. Raykov (1998)
Coefficient Alpha and Composite Reliability With Interrelated Nonhomogeneous ItemsApplied Psychological Measurement, 22
N. Bontis, M. Crossan, J. Hulland (2002)
Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and FlowsJournal of Management Studies, 39
M. Crossan, H. Lane, Roderick White (1999)
An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to InstitutionAcademy of Management Review, 24
J.C. Nunnally
Psychometric Theory
D. Ulrich, T. Jick, M. Glinow (1993)
High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capabilityOrganizational Dynamics, 22
NTPC
Web Site of NTPC Limited
P. Green, V. Rao (1970)
Rating Scales and Information Recovery—How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use?Journal of Marketing, 34
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop an integrated measurement scale for an organizational learning system by capturing the learning enablers, learning results and performance outcome in an organization. Design/methodology/approach – A new measurement scale was developed by integrating and modifying two existing scales, identified through a literature survey. The new scale was validated through the responses of 502 managerial employees from 14 thermal power plants of the largest power company in India. Findings – There were scales, which measure learning enablers or learning achieved or learning in general or the relation between some forms of learning with performance. This study could integrate learning enablers at three levels, learning achieved at three levels, and the organizational outcome in the form of performance in a single scale. Research limitations/implications – The research study took place within the largest organization in one industry to control for potential industry effects across organizations. This may limit its generalizability. Practical implications – The integrated scale developed in the study will help to specifically look for the presence of learning enablers and learning outcomes at individual, group or organizational level and relate them with each other as well as performance. Hence it can be of importance in the study of learning organizations and furthering the understanding of the complex relations involved. Originality/value – This is the first study which clearly demarcates learning enablers at three levels, and learning achieved at three levels, and the organizational outcome in the form of performance in a single integrated scale.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 25, 2010
Keywords: Learning organizations; Organizational performance; India
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.