Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An exploration of unspoken bias: women who work for women

An exploration of unspoken bias: women who work for women Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to inquire whether gender plays a role in the supervisory preference of female workers, and to establish a starting‐point in the identification of any bias that is discovered. Design/methodology/approach – A field experiment of 226 adults of both genders was used to test the hypotheses. It combined a video vignette with a survey that employed a dispositional index followed by attitudinal measures. Findings – Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and regression analyses were used to highlight the biases that were discovered. Females believed that other women are good managers, but the female workers did not actually want to work for them. The results may have some basis in females' perceptions of female managers as being high in dominance. The female manager was also seen as being emotional. More specifically, the female manager was seen as being more nervous and more aggressive than a male manager. It was also discovered that female preference for male supervisors increased with greater numbers of years in the workforce. Research limitations/implications – This is an exploratory study. Workers surveyed were enrolled in a large metropolitan US university. Subsequent studies need to include a broader sample, particularly including workers from earlier generations. Extensive additional research is essential. Originality/value – The findings lend credence to strong but seldom discussed anecdotal undercurrents of women's unwillingness to work for other women. Although female managers have been studied to a limited degree, there has been no empirical research on the female subordinate relationship. The study makes an entry into this important question of whether women have a prejudice against working for other women. The practitioner/policymaker implications are substantial. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Gender in Management: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

An exploration of unspoken bias: women who work for women

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/an-exploration-of-unspoken-bias-women-who-work-for-women-YlWg9q2y6N
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1754-2413
DOI
10.1108/17542410910938817
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to inquire whether gender plays a role in the supervisory preference of female workers, and to establish a starting‐point in the identification of any bias that is discovered. Design/methodology/approach – A field experiment of 226 adults of both genders was used to test the hypotheses. It combined a video vignette with a survey that employed a dispositional index followed by attitudinal measures. Findings – Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and regression analyses were used to highlight the biases that were discovered. Females believed that other women are good managers, but the female workers did not actually want to work for them. The results may have some basis in females' perceptions of female managers as being high in dominance. The female manager was also seen as being emotional. More specifically, the female manager was seen as being more nervous and more aggressive than a male manager. It was also discovered that female preference for male supervisors increased with greater numbers of years in the workforce. Research limitations/implications – This is an exploratory study. Workers surveyed were enrolled in a large metropolitan US university. Subsequent studies need to include a broader sample, particularly including workers from earlier generations. Extensive additional research is essential. Originality/value – The findings lend credence to strong but seldom discussed anecdotal undercurrents of women's unwillingness to work for other women. Although female managers have been studied to a limited degree, there has been no empirical research on the female subordinate relationship. The study makes an entry into this important question of whether women have a prejudice against working for other women. The practitioner/policymaker implications are substantial.

Journal

Gender in Management: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 13, 2009

Keywords: Bias; Gender; Women workers; Women executives; United States of America

References

  • Detecting hidden bias
    Babcock, P.
  • The relationship of negative emotionality, hostile attributional bias, and social orientation to overt and relational aggression
    Berdugo‐Astark, H.
  • Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: the role of category‐based expectancy violation
    Bettencourt, B.; Dill, K.; Greathouse, S.; Charlton, K.; Mulholland, A.
  • Black sheep and expectancy violation: integrating two models of social judgment
    Biernat, M.; Vescio, T.; Billings, L.
  • The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter‐individual differences in attitudes
    de Houwer, J.; de Bruycker, E.
  • Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect
    Diener, E.; Larsen, R.; Levine, S.; Emmons, R.
  • Men, women, and managers: are stereotypes finally changing?
    Duehr, E.; Bono, J.
  • Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders
    Eagley, A.; Karau, S.
  • The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?
    Ellemers, N.; van den Heuvel, H.; Gilder, D.; Maas, A.; Bonvini, A.
  • Bias against overweight job applicants: further explorations of when and why
    Finkelstein, L.; Frautschy Demuth, R.; Sweeney, D.
  • Biases in appraisals of women leaders
    Forsythe, D.; Heiney, M.; Wright, S.
  • Bias study sees few gains for female leaders
    Frauenheim, E.
  • Are some women prejudiced against women?
    Goldberg, P.
  • Sex bias in the work setting: the lack of fit model
    Heilman, M.
  • In the Company of Women
    Heim, P.; Murphy, S.
  • Evaluating the evaluators: perceptions of interviewers by rejected job applicants as a function of interviewer and applicant sex
    Holloway, R.; Johnston, L.
  • Personality Research Form
    Jackson, D.
  • Hidden bias against female bosses?
    Johnson, T.
  • The nature of stereotypes: a comparison and integration of three theories
    Jussim, L.; Coleman, L.; Lerch, L.
  • Men and Women of the Corporation
    Kanter, R.
  • The development of a conceptual model to explain turnover among women in top management teams
    Krishnan, H.; Park, D.; Kilbourne, L.
  • No fat person need apply: experimental studies of the overweight stereotype and hiring preference
    Larkin, J.; Pines, H.
  • Hiring you makes me look bad: social‐identity based reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect
    Lewis, A.; Sherman, S.
  • When leaders display emotion: how followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders
    Lewis, K.
  • Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers
    Mathison, D.
  • Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees
    Maurer, T.; Tarulli, B.
  • Venus envy 2: sisterhood, queen bees and female misogyny in management
    Mavin, S.
  • Male chauvinism and source competence: a research note
    Miller, G.; McReynolds, M.
  • A meta‐analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research
    Moorman, R.; Podsakoff, P.
  • Investigation of the factors that influence employees' participation in development activities
    Noe, R.; Wilk, S.
  • Women's relationships with women in the workplace
    O'Leary, V.
  • Women as managers scale: a measure of attitudes toward women in management positions
    Peters, L.; Terborg, J.; Taynor, J.
  • Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview
    Pingatore, R.; Dugoni, B.; Tindale, R.; Spring, B.
  • Evil thoughts but angelic actions
    Polinko, N.; Popovich, P.
  • A circumplex model of affect
    Russell, J.
  • Beyond Sex Roles
    Sargent, A.
  • Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls
    Simmons, R.
  • Using self‐report questionnaires in OB research: a comment on the use of a controversial method
    Spector, P.
  • Method variance in organizational research: truth or legend?
    Spector, P.
  • The queen bee syndrome
    Staines, G.; Travis, C.; Jayaratne, T.
  • Sugar or spice? Teachers' perception of sex differences in communicative correlates of attraction
    Stohl, C.
  • The association between perceptions of daily experiences and self‐ and spouse‐rated mood
    Stone, A.
  • Men rule – at least in workplace attitudes
    Tahmincioglu, E.
  • Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations
    Tajfel, H.
  • An integrative theory of intergroup conflict
    Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.
  • Household Data Annual Averages: Employment Status of the Noninstitutional Population by Age, Sex, and Race
    US Department of Labor
  • Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales
    Watson, D.; Clark, L.; Tellegen, A.
  • Professional respect for female and male leaders: influential gender‐relevant factors
    Wolfram, H.; Mohr, G.; Schyns, B.