Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J.A. Tompkins, J.A. White, Y.A. Bozer, E.H. Frazelle, J.M.A. Tanchoco, J. Trevino
Facilities Planning
R. Francis, L. McGinnis, John White (1991)
Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach
M.P. Deisenroth, J.M. Apple
A computerized plant layout analysis and evaluation technique (PLANET)
J. Tompkins, R. Reed (1976)
An applied model for the facilities design problemInternational Journal of Production Research, 14
R. Cheng, M. Gent, T. Tozawa (1995)
Genetic search for facility layout design under interflows uncertaintyProceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1
R. Muther (1985)
Systematic Layout Planning
A. Canen, Geoff Williamson (1996)
Facility layout overview: towards competitive advantageFacilities, 14
J. Apple (1977)
Plant Layout and Materials Handling
G.C. Armour, E.S. Buffa, T.E. Vollman
Allocating facilities with CRAFT
S.S. Heragu
Facilities Design
R. Lee, J. Moore (1967)
CORELAP: Computerized relationship layout planning
F. Dweiri (1999)
Fuzzy development of crisp activity relationship charts for facilities layoutComputers & Industrial Engineering, 36
C.E. Donaghey, V.F. Pire
Solving the Facility Layout Problem with BLOCPLAN
G. Rowe, George Wright, F. Bolger (1991)
Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theoryTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 39
F. Azadivar, John Wang (2000)
Facility layout optimization using simulation and genetic algorithmsInternational Journal of Production Research, 38
J.M. Seehof, W.O. Evans
Automated layout design program
Taho Yang, Chao-Ton Su, Yuan Hsu (2000)
Systematic layout planning: a study on semiconductor wafer fabrication facilitiesInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20
M. Rosenblatt (1986)
The dynamics of plant layoutManagement Science, 32
Although many new technologies have been developed in facilities design, the systematic layout planning (SLP) procedure is the most widely used among enterprises and the academic world. The practical applications in a traditional SLP require intricate steps yet their results lack stability. It is difficult to attain reasonable results from alternatives derived via traditional SLP. This study proposes concepts and algorithms such as grouping, compounding, and hypothetical distance to modify procedures and enhance practicality in traditional SLP. The proposed modifications were applied to a case study. The results were superior to solutions derived from computer software simulations and by supervisors of the case company. This study believes that the proposed modifications and procedures can enhance the enterprise's ability in facility design.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 2004
Keywords: Plant layout; Design
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.