Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Gray (2002)
Entrepreneurship, resistance to change and growth in small firmsJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9
R. Gasson, A. Errington (1993)
The Farm Family Business
Gerard McElwee, G. Bosworth (2010)
Exploring the strategic skills of farmers across a typology of farm diversification approaches, 13
H. Renting, J. Wiskerke (2010)
New Emerging Roles for Public Institutions and Civil Society in the Promotion of Sustainable Local Agro-Food Systems
Israel Kirzner (1997)
Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian ApproachJournal of Economic Literature, 35
J. Ploeg, H. Renting, G. Brunori, K. Knickel, J. Mannion, T. Marsden, K. Roest, Eduardo Sevilla-Guzmán, F. Ventura (2000)
Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards TheorySociologia Ruralis, 40
Israel Kirzner (1974)
Competition and Entrepreneurship
Jin-ichiro Yamada (2004)
A Multi-Dimensional View of Entrepreneurship: Towards a Research Agenda on Organisation EmergenceORG: Other Types of Organizations & Organizational Behavior (Topic)
R. Macfarlane (1996)
Modelling the interaction of economic and socio-behavioural factors in the prediction of farm adjustmentJournal of Rural Studies, 12
J. Beedell, T. Rehman (2000)
Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviourJournal of Rural Studies, 16
Gerard McElwee (2008)
A taxonomy of entrepreneurial farmersInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 6
S. Davidova, A. Bailey (2014)
Roles of Small and Semi‐subsistence Farms in the EUEuroChoices, 13
K. Vesala, J. Peura, Gerard McElwee (2007)
The split entrepreneurial identity of the farmerJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14
Nicolai Foss, Peter Klein (2009)
Entrepreneurial Alertness and Opportunity Discovery: Origins, Attributes, CritiqueEntrepreneurship & the Social Sciences eJournal
T. Man, T. Lau, K. Chan (2002)
The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises - A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competenciesJournal of Business Venturing, 17
J. Pyysiainen, Alistair Anderson, Gerard McElwee, K. Vesala (2006)
Developing the entrepreneurial skills of farmers: some myths exploredInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12
S. Parker (2005)
The Economics of Entrepreneurship: What We Know and What We Don'tFoundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1
J. Vik, Gerard McElwee (2011)
Diversification and the Entrepreneurial Motivations of Farmers in NorwayJournal of Small Business Management, 49
Gerard McElwee, Robert Smith (2012)
Classifying the strategic capability of farmers: a segmentation frameworkInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 4
B. Pecqueur (2001)
Qualité et développement territorial: l'hypothèse du panier de biens et de services territorialisés, 261
H Meert, G. Huylenbroeck, T. Vernimmen, Marie Bourgeois, E. Hecke (2005)
Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farmsJournal of Rural Studies, 21
R. Gasson, G. Crow, A. Errington, J. Hutson, T. Marsden, D. Winter (1988)
THE FARM AS A FAMILY BUSINESS: A REVIEWJournal of Agricultural Economics, 39
Gerard McElwee (2006)
FARMERS AS ENTREPRENEURS: DEVELOPING COMPETITIVE SKILLSJournal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11
S. Morgan, M. Miele, T. Marsden (2008)
The ESOF project within its policy context: CAP reform, global change and the response of farmers
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an analysis of the adoption of Rural Development Policies (Rdp) as the result of entrepreneurial behaviours carried out by family farms with a focus on the Lazio Region of Italy. Family farming is the backbone of the European model of agriculture. Rdp provide family farms with a set of opportunities which, if well exploited, could drum up farm’s development. Design/methodology/approach – An empirical analysis of a data base provided by the Lazion region of Italy on the adoption of Rdp by family farms in the Lazio region for the period of 2007-2013. Cluster analysis is the main analytical tool used. Findings – The results evidence significant differences in the adoption of rural policy on the basis of family life cycle and the composition of the family farm. The empirical analysis underlines the low degree of coherence by farms located in rural areas. Practical implications – Farmers’ success in accessing funds requires them to be proactive and take a strategic perspective to convince funders that they have a coherent strategy which meets the requirements of the particular Rdp which they are trying to access. Social implications – In terms of policy, a more nuanced understanding of the entrepreneurial nature of some practices in a rural setting and how they require multi-agency investigation. Originality/value – The paper is unique, in that it considers the consumption of policy by farmers who are entrepreneurial in their vision. By consumption of Rdp, we mean the farmer’s strategic capability to obtain funds from regional funding pots for rural development.
Society and Business Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 9, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.