Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Bottom, W. McGreal, G. Heaney (1999)
Appraising the functional performance characteristics of office buildingsJournal of Property Research, 16
P. Ganon
The secured approach to flexibility
A. Leaman, B. Bordass (1999)
Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variablesBuilding Research and Information, 27
F. Booty, M. Roseland
Workplace trends in the 21 st century: business burden or benefits
R. Bunn
Productive workplace – means of escape
P. Barrett (1997)
Facilities Management: Towards Best Practice
D. Canter, P. Stringer
Environmental Interaction: Psychological Approach to our Physical Surrounding
Jim Sinopoli (2006)
Smart Buildings
B. Haynes
Does property benefits occupier? An evaluation of literature
J. Pinder
Evaluating workplace utility
B. Betts (2006)
Smart SensorsIEEE Spectrum, 43
A. Rubin
The need for a responsive workplace
I. Cooper (2001)
Post-occupancy evaluation - where are you?Building Research & Information, 29
F. Cook
Lighting quality aspects: essential requirements for visually impaired people
P.E. Ehrlich
What is an intelligent building? Part 1: an introduction to intelligent building design
K. Lynch
An introduction to smart open property automation
F.A. Ohemeng, T. Mole
Value‐focused approach to built asset renewal and replacement decision
B. Bordass, A. Leaman, P. Ruyssevelt (2001)
Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implicationsBuilding Research & Information, 29
T.S. Bowen
Impact assessment: overly smart building
D. Clements‐Croome
Intelligent Buildings: Design, Management & Operation
N. Oseland, P. Bartlett (1999)
Improving Office Productivity: A Guide for Business and Facilities Managers
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the embedded smart sensors (ESS) technologies and users' performance in the workplace. An attempt will be made to assess the impact of incorporating ESS on user performance in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach – A multi‐pronged approach was adopted in compiling relevant factual and perceptual information about users responses in the workplace. Both questionnaires and structured interviews with users and facilities managers (FMs) in a selected study sample are adopted to identify issues of concern and assess the level of users comfort in the workplace. Findings – The incorporation of ESS will have wide‐ranging implications to office productivity which is partially dependent on the utility of the space and qualities of internal environment within which business operates. Originality/value – The use of ESS is significant in optimizing the operational efficiency of the workplace and its responsiveness of meeting varying users needs. This will be beneficial to varying property stakeholders including owners, clients, occupiers and FMs.
Journal of Facilities Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 17, 2007
Keywords: Intelligent sensors; Workplace; Employee productivity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.