Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Fisher-Gewirtzman, I. Wagner (2003)
Spatial Openness as a Practical Metric for Evaluating Built-up EnvironmentsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30
(2005)
Adaptive reuse in an urban setting: evaluating the benefits of reusing an existing building site in Florida for maximum profit potential and eco-effectiveness
B. Ross, Diana Chen, Sheila Conejos, A. Khademi (2016)
Enabling Adaptable Buildings: Results of a Preliminary Expert SurveyProcedia Engineering, 145
(1993)
Imaging the concepts of isovist field in design process — topdown Isoview — a tool for spatial analysis
A. Indraprastha, M. Shinozaki (2012)
Computational models for measuring spatial quality of interior design in virtual environmentBuilding and Environment, 49
P. Herthogs, Anne Paduart, F. Denis, B. Tunçer (2017)
Evaluating the generality and adaptability of floor plans using the SAGA method: a didactic example based on the historical shophouse and gentry house types
(2020)
Open building
Ethan Bernstein, Stephen Turban (2018)
The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaborationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373
G. Oldham, Daniel Brass (1979)
Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 24
H. Baker (2020)
The adaptation and demolition of existing buildings on masterplan sites
P. Herthogs, W. Debacker, B. Tunçer, Yves Weerdt, N. Temmerman (2019)
Quantifying the Generality and Adaptability of Building Layouts Using Weighted Graphs: The SAGA MethodBuildings
D. Fisher-Gewirtzman (2017)
The association between perceived density in minimum apartments and spatial openness index three-dimensional visual analysisEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44
Barry Haynes (2008)
The impact of office layout on productivityJournal of Facilities Management, 6
R.A. Gunn, M.S. Burroughs (2020)
Work spaces that work: designing high-performance offices - ProQuest
(2020)
Lexico dictionaries | English
P. Femenías, F. Geromel (2019)
Adaptable housing? A quantitative study of contemporary apartment layouts that have been rearranged by end-usersJournal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35
R. Blok, P. Teuffel (2019)
Demolition versus Transformation, “mortality of building structures” depending on their technical building propertiesIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225
Michael Benedikt (1979)
To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist FieldsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6
(2018)
Yes, the open office is terrible — but it doesn't have to Be (Ep. 358)
Anna Black, B. Ross, Z. Rockow (2018)
Identifying Physical Features that Facilitate and Impede Building AdaptationSustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018
(2012)
Workspace utilization and allocation
Fernanda Acre, Annemie Wyckmans (2015)
Dwelling renovation and spatial quality: The impact of the dwelling renovation on spatial quality determinantsInternational journal of sustainable built environment, 4
E. Do, M. Gross (1997)
Tools for Visual and Spatial Analysis of CAD Models
T. Schneider, J. Till (2005)
Flexible housing: opportunities and limitsArchitectural Research Quarterly, 9
O. Heidrich, J. Kamara, S. Maltese, F. Cecconi, M. Dejaco (2017)
A critical review of the developments in building adaptability, 35
This paper aims to describe and demonstrate a quantitative areal openness model (AOM) for measuring the openness of floor plans. Creation of the model was motivated by the widely reported but rarely quantified link between openness and adaptability.Design/methodology/approachThe model calculates values for three indicators: openness score (OS), weighted OS (WOS) and openness potential (OP). OS measures the absence of obstructions (walls, chases, columns) that separate areas in a floor plan. WOS measures the number of obstructions while also accounting for the difficulty of removing them. OP measures the potential of a floor plan to become more open. Indicators were calculated for three demolished case study buildings and for three adapted buildings. The case study buildings were selected because openness – or lack thereof – contributed to the owners' decisions to demolish or adapt.FindingsOpenness indicators were consistent with the real-world outcomes (adaptation or demolition) of the case study buildings. This encouraging result suggests that the proposed model is a reasonable approach for comparing the openness of floor plans and evaluating them for possible adaptation or demolition.Originality/valueThe AOM is presented as a tool for facility managers to evaluate inventories of existing buildings, designers to compare alternative plan layouts and researchers to measure openness of case studies. It is intended to be sufficiently complex as to produce meaningful results, relatively simple to apply and readily modifiable to suit different situations. The model is the first to calculate floor plan openness within the context of adaptability.
International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 18, 2021
Keywords: Adaptation; Demolition; Model; Openness; Floor plans; Adaptability
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.