Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part I

An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part I This paper explores the added value of chaordic systems Thinking for organizational renewal, which is defined as transformation instead of reformation. The exploration is presented in the form of an antagonistic dialogue between two “voices,” which develop commentaries from distinct theoretical inspirations, namely chaordic systems thinking (CST) and socio‐technical systems design (STS). This paper contains part I of the conversation. In the course of the dialogue it becomes obvious that CST both includes and transcends STS, and that it is firmly based in democratic values. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Learning Organization Emerald Publishing

An antagonistic dialogue about chaordic systems thinking: part I

The Learning Organization , Volume 11 (6): 8 – Dec 1, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/an-antagonistic-dialogue-about-chaordic-systems-thinking-part-i-DxZwOQfvAM

References (12)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0969-6474
DOI
10.1108/09696470410548809
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper explores the added value of chaordic systems Thinking for organizational renewal, which is defined as transformation instead of reformation. The exploration is presented in the form of an antagonistic dialogue between two “voices,” which develop commentaries from distinct theoretical inspirations, namely chaordic systems thinking (CST) and socio‐technical systems design (STS). This paper contains part I of the conversation. In the course of the dialogue it becomes obvious that CST both includes and transcends STS, and that it is firmly based in democratic values.

Journal

The Learning OrganizationEmerald Publishing

Published: Dec 1, 2004

Keywords: Sociotechnical change; Organizational change; Learning

There are no references for this article.