Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Richard Herrmann, Thomas Risse-Kappen, M. Brewer (2004)
Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the Eu
M. Tamuz, E. Lewis (2008)
Facing the Threat of Disaster: Decision Making When the Stakes are High
R. Rose (1993)
Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space
Jens-Christian Smeby, Jarle Trondal (2005)
Globalisation or europeanisation? International contact among university staffHigher Education, 49
Nicoline Frølich (2008)
Justifications and Drivers
Johan Olsen (2003)
Towards a European administrative space?Journal of European Public Policy, 10
F. Barrett, Ken Peplowski (1998)
Minimal Structures Within a Song: An Analysis of All of MeOrganization Science, 9
F. Barrett (1998)
Creativity and Improvisation in Jazz and Organizations: Implications for Organizational Learning
Anil Gaba, W. Viscusi, A. Meyer, F. Barrett (1998)
Coda : Creativity and Improvisation in Jazzand Organizations: Implications Fororganizational LearningOrganization Science, 9
B. Kohler-Koch (2003)
Linking EU and National Governance
M. Egeberg (1994)
Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: The Case of Administrative PolicyGovernance, 7
Jarle Trondal (2010)
Two worlds of change: on the internationalisation of universitiesGlobalisation, Societies and Education, 8
E. Roe, P. Schulman (2008)
High Reliability Management: Operating on the Edge
U. Teichler (2004)
The Changing Debate on Internationalisation of Higher EducationHigher Education, 48
M. Barnett, M. Finnemore (1999)
The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International OrganizationsInternational Organization, 53
A. Johnston (2007)
International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe
Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid (2010)
The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management
Ǻ. Gornitzka, Magnus Gulbrandsen, Jarle Trondal (2003)
Internationalization of research and higher education: Emerging patterns of transformations
A. Lomi, J. Harrison (2012)
The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty
Jens-Christian Smeby (2000)
Disciplinary Differences in Norwegian Graduate EducationStudies in Higher Education, 25
W. Powell, Paul DiMaggio (1993)
The New Institutionalism in Organizational AnalysisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 38
P. Pierson (2004)
Politics in time
M. Egeberg (2003)
How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective
R. Gopal, Paulo Góes, R. Garfinkel, A. Lewin (1998)
Introduction: Jazz Improvisation As a Metaphor for Organization TheoryOrganization Science, 9
K. Weick (1998)
Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis
J. March, Z. Shapira (2008)
Explorations in Organizations
J. March, Johan Olsen (1998)
The Institutional Dynamics of International Political OrdersInternational Organization, 52
Jeffrey Checkel (2005)
International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and FrameworkInternational Organization, 59
Johan Olsen (2007)
The Institutional Dynamics of the European University
Jarle Trondal (2005)
Two Worlds of Europeanisation - Unpacking Models of Government Innovation and Transgovernmental ImitationEuropean Economics eJournal
J. March (2010)
The Ambiguities of Experience
B. Stensaker, Nicoline Frølich, Ǻ. Gornitzka, P. Maassen (2008)
Internationalisation of higher education: the gap between national policy‐making and institutional needsGlobalisation, Societies and Education, 6
K. Arrow (1973)
Higher education as a filterJournal of Public Economics, 2
K. Orren, S. Skowronek (2004)
The Search for American Political Development
Johan Olsen, P. Maassen (2007)
University Dynamics and European Integration
Sally Selden (2015)
The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency
K. Sutcliffe, Marlys Christianson (2001)
Managing the unexpected
Nils Brunsson, B. Jacobsson (2000)
A World of Standards
K. Meier, Lloyd Nigro (1976)
Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal ExecutivesPublic Administration Review, 36
William Harbaugh, David Hammack, S. Skowronek (1984)
Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century@@@Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920The American Historical Review, 89
M. Hatch, K. Weick (1998)
Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational AnalysisOrganization Science, 9
K. Weick (1976)
Educational organizations as loosely coupled systemsGestión y Estrategia
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (2012)
“A Garbage Can Model” At Forty: A Solution that Still Attracts Problems, 36
Johan Olsen, P. Maassen (2007)
European Debates on the Knowledge Institution: The Modernization of the University at the European Level
C. Paradeise (2009)
University governance : Western European comparative perspectives
S. Kyvik, I. Larsen (1997)
The Exchange of KnowledgeScience Communication, 18
Tony Becher (1989)
Academic Tribes And Territories
Johan Olsen (2001)
Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 95
S. Marginson, M. Considine (2000)
The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia
Jarle Trondal (2010)
An Emergent European Executive Order
A. Luijten-Lub, Marijk Wende, J. Huisman (2005)
On Cooperation and Competition: A Comparative Analysis of National Policies for Internationalisation of Higher Education in Seven Western European CountriesJournal of Studies in International Education, 9
M. Hogg, D. Terry (2014)
Social Identity Dynamics in Modern Organizations: An Organizational Psychology/Organizational Behavior Perspective
Barbara Senior (1997)
Organizational Change
C. Hood (2011)
The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management – By Tom Christensen and Per LaegreidGovernance, 24
Johan Olsen (2013)
The Institutional Basis of Democratic AccountabilityWest European Politics, 36
M. Hogg, D. Terry (2001)
Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts
J. March, Johan Olsen (1989)
Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics
C. Paradeise, Jean-Claude Thoenig (2013)
Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global StandardsOrganization Studies, 34
H. Heclo (2008)
On Thinking Institutionally
M. Egeberg, Jarle Trondal (2007)
NATIONAL AGENCIES IN THE EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE: GOVERNMENT DRIVEN, COMMISSION DRIVEN OR NETWORKED?Public Administration, 87
J. Pfeffer (1982)
Organizations and Organization Theory
Purpose – The aim of this article is threefold: the primary aim is conceptual by outlining two ideal-typical ideas about organizational life. These models offer rival ideas about how organizations balance seemingly conflicting patterns of behaviour and change in everyday life. The second ambition of the article is to outline a theoretical approach of organizational life arguing that even fairly loosely coupled organizations may be profoundly patterned by everyday routines as much as by ambiguity. The third and final ambition is to offer empirical illustrations from organizations that are often considered as archetypes of loose coupling and ambiguities: jazz orchestras and university organizations. The empirical discussion, however, illustrates that behaviour and change in these organizations are coined by routines and rules. Design/methodology/approach – Two common dynamics often observed in organizations are highlighted: first, organizations viewed as sets of formal structures and routines that systematically bias organizational performance and change, and secondly, organizations as loosely coupled structures that enable improvisation with respect to organizational performance and change. How organizations live with and practice such seemingly contradictory dynamics is empirically illuminated in two types of organizations that are seldom analysed in tandem – university organizations and jazz orchestras. Drawing on contemporary research on these seemingly contradictory laboratories of organizational analysis, some observations are highlighted that indeed are common to both types of organizations. Furthermore, it is argued that lessons may be drawn from organizations where turbulence is common and where seemingly un-organized processes are quite regular. University organizations and jazz orchestras represent such types of organizations. Findings – First, the degree of ambiguity in organizations is a matter of degree, not an either/or, and that the uncertainty and spontaneity observed in organizational behaviour and change is more patterned than often assumed (see Heimer and Stinchcombe, 1999; Strauss, 1979). As such, organization theory may be a useful extension of the garbage can model, suggesting that streams in decision-making processes may be systematically pre-packed and patterned by the availability of access and attention structures (Cohen et al., 1976). Secondly, scholarship in organizational studies needs to do away with over-simplistic dichotomies when facing complex realities. This challenge is equal for studies of public sector organizations as for scholarship in business and management. Organization studies often face the tyranny of conceptual dichotomies (Olsen, 2007). This article suggests that the distinction between loose and tight coupling in organizations, as between improvisation and pre-planned activities in organizations, face the danger of shoehorning complex data into simple categories. Originality/value – How organizations live with and practice seemingly contradictory dynamics is empirically illuminated in two types of organizations that are seldom analysed in tandem in organizational studies – university organizations and jazz orchestras. These conflicting organizational dynamics pinpoint one classical dilemma in university and jazz life beleaguered on the inherent trade-off between instrumental design and the logic of hierarchy on the one hand, and individual artistic autonomy and professional neutrality on the other. “(T)he purpose of developing the jazz metaphor is to draw out the collaborative, spontaneous and artful aspects of organizing in contradiction to the engineered, planned and controlled models that dominate modern management thoughts” (Hatch, 1999, p. 4). This dilemma highlights competing understandings of organizational life, of institutional change, and of what the pursuit of organizational goals ultimately entails.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 9, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.