Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Decety, J. Cowell (2014)
Friends or FoesPerspectives on Psychological Science, 9
Helena Bilandzic, Cornelia Schnell, Freya Sukalla (2019)
The Cultivation of Idealistic Moral Expectations: The Role of Television Exposure and Narrative EngageabilityMass Communication and Society, 22
Elias Khalil (2001)
Adam Smith and Three Theories of AltruismRecherches économiques de Louvain
J. Crocker, Lora Park (2004)
The costly pursuit of self-esteem.Psychological bulletin, 130 3
(1984)
Focus of attention and altruism: endocentric and exocentric sources of altruistic behavior
R. Blair (2005)
Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populationsConsciousness and Cognition, 14
M. Babula (2007)
Political Values in a Threat EnvironmentPS: Political Science & Politics, 40
S. Milgram (1963)
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE.Journal of abnormal psychology, 67
(2004)
Basic human needs, altruism, and aggression
C. Batson, Tricia Klein, Lori Highberger, Laura Shaw (1995)
Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflictJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68
The purpose of this paper is to answer the question, “Can particular types of altruism influence people to make unethical decisions?” The purpose of seeking to answer this question is to better understand those cases in personal, public and commercial life whereby a decision-maker is influenced by what is widely perceived to be a positive thing – altruism – to make unethical choices.Design/methodology/approachAn experiment was designed to test the influence of different categories of altruism on decision-making about whether to find another guilty for a regulatory transgression. This involved the establishment and running of a student panel at a UK university, which was given the task of determining the guilt or otherwise of two students accused of plagiarism – one from a poor background; one from a rich background. Through a survey of both the decision-makers and their judgments, and by analyzing the data using t-tests and Mann–Whitney tests, the associations between different categories of altruism and the decisions made could be ascertained.FindingsA total of 70.7% of the participants voted “not-guilty” for the poor student, whereas 68.3% voted “guilty” for the wealthy student. This indicated that self-interested, namely, egoistic altruism complemented by social and self-esteem needs gratification was significantly associated with violating foundational ethical principles.Originality/valueThis is the first study to be done that attempts to evaluate the relationships between different categories of altruism and ethical decision-making. The findings here challenge aggregating all forms of empathy together when exploring the antecedents of unethical behavior.
International Journal of Ethics and Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 22, 2020
Keywords: Morality; Ethics; Personality; Altruism; Pro-social behaviour
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.