Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

After UNGASS – where do governments go from here?

After UNGASS – where do governments go from here? PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to indicate the outcomes, implications and possibilities for responses arising from the April 2016 UNGASS meeting and statement and to identify areas for future continuation of the debate and dialogue established at UNGASS.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a practitioner and participant commentary on the implications and openings for governments and jurisdictions of a revised international policy framework.FindingsThe UNGASS statement represented an increased emphasis on health and human rights considerations and a de facto flexibility of interpretation and implementation by national governments. The statement reconciled considerable differences of approach and expectation by the participating governments and organisations. Future developments are identified and practical responses outlined. There has been some move away from rigid prohibition and authoritarian stances.Research limitations/implicationsThe points made could be developed and expanded by academics and NGOs.Practical implicationsFuture areas for continued international policy development and governments’ activity are identified. Governments are encouraged to consider their national needs and priorities and the ways in which these can contribute to and be strengthened by and in the international conventions.Social implicationsThe ability of governments to respond to national needs and situations has been strengthened and an increased emphasis on public health and harm reduction practices is implied. Policy pluralism is recognised.Originality/valueThe paper represents an assessment of the outcomes and future potential for development of the international conventions. It is written by a long-standing participant in the international drugs policy debate and is an early contribution to the practical and formative response to UNGASS. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Drugs and Alcohol Today Emerald Publishing

After UNGASS – where do governments go from here?

Drugs and Alcohol Today , Volume 17 (2): 7 – Jun 5, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/after-ungass-where-do-governments-go-from-here-0MNn0dQMYM

References (1)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1745-9265
DOI
10.1108/DAT-12-2016-0030
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to indicate the outcomes, implications and possibilities for responses arising from the April 2016 UNGASS meeting and statement and to identify areas for future continuation of the debate and dialogue established at UNGASS.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a practitioner and participant commentary on the implications and openings for governments and jurisdictions of a revised international policy framework.FindingsThe UNGASS statement represented an increased emphasis on health and human rights considerations and a de facto flexibility of interpretation and implementation by national governments. The statement reconciled considerable differences of approach and expectation by the participating governments and organisations. Future developments are identified and practical responses outlined. There has been some move away from rigid prohibition and authoritarian stances.Research limitations/implicationsThe points made could be developed and expanded by academics and NGOs.Practical implicationsFuture areas for continued international policy development and governments’ activity are identified. Governments are encouraged to consider their national needs and priorities and the ways in which these can contribute to and be strengthened by and in the international conventions.Social implicationsThe ability of governments to respond to national needs and situations has been strengthened and an increased emphasis on public health and harm reduction practices is implied. Policy pluralism is recognised.Originality/valueThe paper represents an assessment of the outcomes and future potential for development of the international conventions. It is written by a long-standing participant in the international drugs policy debate and is an early contribution to the practical and formative response to UNGASS.

Journal

Drugs and Alcohol TodayEmerald Publishing

Published: Jun 5, 2017

There are no references for this article.