Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Willem Anemaat, K. Po, B. Kaushik (2008)
Aircraft Performance Prediction: Comparison of Classical Handbook Methods to Detailed Time Integration Computer-Aided MethodsSAE International Journal of Aerospace, 1
B. Nagel, D. Boehnke, V. Gollnick, P. Schmollgruber, A. Rizzi, G. Roccax, J. Alonso (2012)
Communication in aircraft design : Can we establish a common language?
B. Pierson, S. Ong (1989)
Minimum-fuel aircraft transition trajectoriesMathematical and Computer Modelling, 12
ALR Aerospace (2016)
APP 6.0 technical reference manual
M. Eshelby (2000)
Aircraft Performance: Theory and Practice
ALR Aerospace (2016)
APP 6.0 user manual
John Hunter (2007)
Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics EnvironmentComputing in Science & Engineering, 9
L. Mccullers (1984)
Aircraft configuration optimization including optimized flight profiles
W. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, B. Flannery (2007)
Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing
E. Jones, T. Oliphant, Pearu Peterson (2001)
SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python
D. Raymer (2012)
Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach 5e and RDSWin STUDENT
Airbus (2002)
Getting to grips with aircraft performance
(2016)
Hybrid Propulsion System and Aircraft-level Performance Simulation, E2 - Fliegen Symposium: Flugzeuge mit elektrischem Antrieb - Aufbruch in die emissionsfreie
J. Mattingly, W. Heiser, D. Daley (1987)
Aircraft engine design
(2009)
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of an Extreme Aspect Ratio HALE UAV. In 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO) (pp. 1–13)
(1990)
Elements of airplane performance (Vol. 2600)
R. McDonald (2011)
Mission Performance Considered as Point Performance in Aircraft DesignJournal of Aircraft, 48
(2007)
and Gaël Varoquaux
E. Hayes, Eric Welch, John Ventura (2018)
Designing Unmanned Aircraft SystemsNEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
M. Hepperle (2012)
Electric Flight - Potential and Limitations
Stéfan Walt, G. Varoquaux, Inria Saclay, France (2011)
The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical ComputationComputing in Science & Engineering, 13
S. Obispo (2009)
MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AN EXTREME ASPECT RATIO HALE UAV
E. Moerland, T. Zill, B. Nagel, H. Spangenberg, H. Schumann, Peter Zamov (2012)
Application of a Distributed MDAO Framework to the Design of a Short- to Medium-Range Aircraft
S. Ojha (1995)
Flight performance of aircraft
Python 2.7, Python Software Foundation
G. Rossum (1999)
Python Tutorial
David Johnson (1972)
Evaluation of Energy Maneuverability Procedures in Aircraft Flight Path Optimization and Performance Estimation
PurposeThe preliminary aircraft design process comprises multiple disciplines. During performance analysis, parameters of the design mission have to be optimized. Mission performance optimization is often challenging, especially for complex mission profiles (e.g. for unmanned aerial vehicles [UAVs]) or hybrid-electric propulsion. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find a methodology that supports aircraft performance analysis and that is applicable to complex profiles and to novel designs.Design/methodology/approachAs its core element, the developed method uses a computationally efficient C++ software “Aircraft Performance Program” (APP), which performs a segment-based mission computation. APP performs a time integration of the equations of motion of a point mass in the vertical plane. APP is called via a command line interface from a flexible scripting language (Python). On top of APP’s internal radius of action optimization, state-of-the-art optimization packages (SciPy) are used.FindingsThe application of the method to a conventional climb schedule shows that the definition of the top of climb has a significant influence on the resulting optimum. Application of the method to a complex UAV mission optimization, which included maximizing the radius of action, was successful. Low computation time enables to perform large parametric studies. This greatly improves the interpretation of the results.Research limitations/implicationsThe scope of the paper is limited to the methodology that allows for advanced performance analysis at the conceptual and preliminary design stages with an emphasis on novel propulsion concepts. The methodology is developed using existing, validated methods, and therefore, this paper does not contain comprehensive validation. Other disciplines, such as cost analysis, life-cycle assessment or market analysis, are not considered.Practical implicationsWith the proposed method, it is possible to obtain not only the desired optimum mission performance but also off-design performance of the investigated design. A thorough analysis of the mission performance provides insight into the design’s capabilities and shortcomings, ultimately aiding in obtaining a more efficient design.Originality/valueRecent developments in the area of hybrid or hybrid-electric propulsion systems have shown the need for performance computation tools aiding the related design process. The presented method is especially valuable when novel design concepts with complex mission profiles are investigated.
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 8, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.