Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Park, C. Armstrong (2017)
Collaborative apparel consumption in the digital sharing economy: An agenda for academic inquiryInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 41
P. Rozin, Linda Millman, C. Nemeroff (1986)
Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50
A. Lindblom, Taru Lindblom, Heidi Wechtler (2018)
Collaborative consumption as C2C trading: Analyzing the effects of materialism and price consciousnessJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
F. Bardhi, Giana Eckhardt (2012)
Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car SharingJournal of Consumer Research, 39
K. Johnson, J. Mun, Yoori Chae (2016)
Antecedents to internet use to collaboratively consume apparelJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20
Emma Edbring, Matthias Lehner, O. Mont (2016)
Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriersJournal of Cleaner Production, 123
(2020)
FAQs
Jennifer Argo, D. Dahl, Andrea Morales (2006)
Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by OthersJournal of Marketing, 70
S. Putrevu, Kenneth Lord (1994)
Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement ConditionsJournal of Advertising, 23
Carolin Becker-Leifhold, S. Iran (2018)
Collaborative fashion consumption - drivers, barriers and future pathwaysJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22
H. Park, C. Armstrong (2019)
Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparelJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
H. Park, C. Armstrong (2019)
Will “no-ownership” work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailersJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Geir Sogn-Grundvåg, Jens Østli (2009)
Consumer evaluation of unbranded and unlabelled food products: The case of bacalhauEuropean Journal of Marketing, 43
Thomas Puschmann, R. Alt (2016)
Sharing EconomyBusiness & Information Systems Engineering, 58
C. Nemeroff, P. Rozin (1994)
The Contagion Concept in Adult Thinking in the United States: Transmission of Germs and of Interpersonal InfluenceEthos, 22
Juho Hamari, Mimmi Sjöklint, Antti Ukkonen (2016)
The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumptionJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67
R. Belk (2007)
Why Not Share Rather Than Own?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611
(2015)
Consumer intelligence series: the sharing economy
A. Miller (2019)
Thrift stores in the US
Lynn O’Reilly, M. Rucker, R. Hughes, Marge Gorang, Susan Hand (1984)
The relationship of psychological and situational variables to usage of a second-order marketing systemJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12
Mareike Möhlmann (2015)
Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option againJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 14
B. Unglesbee, D. Howland, K. Vembar (2020)
The impact of the coronavirus in retail
P. Rozin, C. Nemeroff, M. Wane, Amy Sherrod (1989)
Operation of the sympathetic magical law of contagion in interpersonal attitudes among AmericansBulletin of the psychonomic society, 27
A. Angyal (1941)
Disgust and related aversions.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36
Xiaoli Nan, Kwangjun Heo (2007)
Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related MarketingJournal of Advertising, 36
David Hauser, Norbert Schwarz (2015)
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participantsBehavior Research Methods, 48
Andrea Morales, G. Fitzsimons (2007)
Product Contagion: Changing Consumer Evaluations through Physical Contact with “Disgusting” ProductsJournal of Marketing Research, 44
(2016)
Online clothing rental market: North America, Western Europe, and APEJ to collectively hold over 90% revenue share by 2016 end: global industry analysis & opportunity assessment, 2016-2026
A. Lindblom, Taru Lindblom (2017)
De-ownership orientation and collaborative consumption during turbulent economic timesInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 41
Thredup (2019)
2019 Resale report
A. Diamantopoulos, M. Sarstedt, Christoph Fuchs, Petra Wilczynski, Sebastian Kaiser (2012)
Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspectiveJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40
Helena Pizzol, Stefânia Almeida, Mauren Soares (2017)
Collaborative Consumption: A Proposed Scale for Measuring the Construct Applied to a Carsharing SettingSustainability, 9
S. Gopalakrishnan, Delisia Matthews (2018)
Collaborative consumption: a business model analysis of second-hand fashionJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22
S. Iran, Ulf Schrader (2017)
Collaborative fashion consumption and its environmental effectsJournal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21
Iana Castro, Andrea Morales, S. Nowlis (2013)
The Influence of Disorganized Shelf Displays and Limited Product Quantity on Consumer PurchaseJournal of Marketing, 77
One of the major concerns in the emerging phenomenon of collaborative consumption (CC) is the issue of contamination (i.e. feeling “grossed out” when sharing items with others). Guided by the law of contagion and the consumer contamination effect theory, this research investigated the ways in which companies can manipulate in order to reduce the negative contamination when renting or purchasing used fashion items from others. Specifically, this research examines this issue of contamination through the ownership type of the shared goods (e.g. corporate-ownership or B2C exchange, and consumer-ownership or C2C exchange) and its effect on consumers' CC intentions in two distinct sharing contexts (i.e. rental and secondhand purchase).Design/methodology/approachA total of 181 American female consumers were assigned to an experimental CC scenario, and their rental/secondhand purchase intentions were compared through ANCOVA analysis.FindingsIn both rental and secondhand purchase contexts, consumers displayed greater intentions to shop in B2C setting (i.e. corporate-ownership) with no direct contact with the previous owner, than in C2C setting (i.e. consumer-ownership) with a greater association with the previous owner and the shared items. Such inclination was more prevalent when purchasing a shirt than a handbag, suggesting that consumers feel more grossed out when there is greater physical contact with the shared item.Originality/valueThe findings of the study suggest a possible solution to alleviate the contamination effect, and the discovery of the degree of contact as a moderator provides new insight into contamination research.
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 9, 2021
Keywords: Collaborative consumption; Consumer contamination effect; Fashion sharing; Contact
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.