Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1991)
21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy: An Industry-Led View
P. Gould (1997)
What is agility? [agile manufacturing]Manufacturing Engineer, 76
D. Towill, M. Naim, J. Wikner (1992)
Industrial Dynamics Simulation Models in the Design of Supply ChainsInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 22
P. McCullen, Cope D., M. Silano
Industrial dynamics and supply chain integration
M. Robertson, C. Jones (1999)
Application of lean production and agile manufacturing concepts in a telecommunications environmentInternational Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1
R. Lamming (1996)
Squaring lean supply with supply chain managementInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16
J.L. Burbidge
Period batch control (PBC) with GT – the way forward from MRP
D.T. Jones, P. Hines, N. Rich
Lean logistics
D. Towill, P. McCullen (1999)
The Impact of Agile Manufacturing on Supply Chain DynamicsThe International Journal of Logistics Management, 10
A. Del Vecchio, D.R. Towill, J.S. Edgehill
Inventory performance in multi‐echelon production‐distribution systems
J.W. Forrester
Industrial Dynamics
P. Kidd (1994)
Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers
G. Watson (1994)
Business systems engineering
H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, S. Whang
Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect
P. Gould
What is agility?
J. Wikner, D. Towill, M. Naim (1991)
Smoothing Supply Chain DynamicsInternational Journal of Production Economics, 22
J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, D. Roos
The Machine That Changed the World
J. Freeman (1992)
Inventory Control and ManagementJournal of the Operational Research Society, 44
J. Womack, Daniel Jones, D. Roos (1990)
The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile
J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones
Lean Thinking
R.C. Lamming
Beyond Partnership
Drawing on results from supply chain modelling and dynamic simulation, presents four material flow principles which can be employed to reduce the bullwhip effect. A case study from the precision mechanical engineering sector is employed to illustrate the effect of rapid response manufacturing and supply chain integration. Analysis of six years of time-series data indicates bullwhip reduction of up to 58 per cent. These results serve to validate the four material flow principles of selecting appropriate control systems, time-compression, information transparency, and echelon elimination. They also raise interesting questions concerning the relationship between manufacturing agility and lean supply. For, by attenuating bullwhip the studied company was able to reduce their global inventory by 45 per cent. Thus, by viewing manufacturing in the context of the supply chain as a whole, it is possible to see how agile manufacturing can eliminate sources of variability induced waste; particularly inventory. In this way it is argued that agile manufacturing can subsume the paradigm of lean production.
Integrated Manufacturing Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2001
Keywords: Supply chain; Integration; Globalization; Engineering
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.