Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Accounting for non-financial matters: technologies of humility as a means for developing critical dialogic accounting and accountability

Accounting for non-financial matters: technologies of humility as a means for developing critical... The purpose of this paper is to present an expanded introduction of Jasanoff’s (2003, 2007) work on “technologies of humility” to the accounting literature and to show how it can be useful in developing critical dialogic accountings for non-financial matters.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on Jasanoff’s (2003, 2007) distinction between “technologies of hubris” and “technologies of humility”, this study extends prior research on critical dialogic accounting and accountability (CDAA) that seeks to “take pluralism seriously” (Brown, 2009; Dillard and Vinnari, 2019). This study shows how Jasanoff’s work facilitates constructing critical, reflexive approaches to accounting for non-financial matters consistent with agonistics-based CDAA.FindingsJasanoff’s four proposed focal points for developing new analytical tools for accounting for non-financial matters and promoting participatory governance – framing, vulnerability, distribution and learning – are argued to be useful in conceptualising possible CDAA technologies. These aspects are all currently ignored or downplayed in conventional approaches to accounting for non-financial matters, limiting accounting’s ability to promote more socially just and ecologically sustainable societies.Originality/valueThe authors introduce Jasanoff’s work on technologies of humility to show how CDAA, informed by Jasanoff’s proposed focal points, can help to expose controversial issues that powerful interests prefer to obscure, to surface the normative foundations of technocratic analytic methods, to address the need for plural perspectives and social learning and to bring all these aspects “into the dynamics of democratic debate” (Jasanoff, 2003, p. 240). As such, they provide criteria for constructing accounting technology consistent with agonistics-based CDAA. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Meditari Accountancy Research Emerald Publishing

Accounting for non-financial matters: technologies of humility as a means for developing critical dialogic accounting and accountability

Brown, Judy; Dillard, Jesse
Meditari Accountancy Research , Volume 29 (2): 22 – Jun 21, 2021
Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/accounting-for-non-financial-matters-technologies-of-humility-as-a-oEDeiNSHjW
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2049-372X
DOI
10.1108/medar-01-2020-0692
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present an expanded introduction of Jasanoff’s (2003, 2007) work on “technologies of humility” to the accounting literature and to show how it can be useful in developing critical dialogic accountings for non-financial matters.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on Jasanoff’s (2003, 2007) distinction between “technologies of hubris” and “technologies of humility”, this study extends prior research on critical dialogic accounting and accountability (CDAA) that seeks to “take pluralism seriously” (Brown, 2009; Dillard and Vinnari, 2019). This study shows how Jasanoff’s work facilitates constructing critical, reflexive approaches to accounting for non-financial matters consistent with agonistics-based CDAA.FindingsJasanoff’s four proposed focal points for developing new analytical tools for accounting for non-financial matters and promoting participatory governance – framing, vulnerability, distribution and learning – are argued to be useful in conceptualising possible CDAA technologies. These aspects are all currently ignored or downplayed in conventional approaches to accounting for non-financial matters, limiting accounting’s ability to promote more socially just and ecologically sustainable societies.Originality/valueThe authors introduce Jasanoff’s work on technologies of humility to show how CDAA, informed by Jasanoff’s proposed focal points, can help to expose controversial issues that powerful interests prefer to obscure, to surface the normative foundations of technocratic analytic methods, to address the need for plural perspectives and social learning and to bring all these aspects “into the dynamics of democratic debate” (Jasanoff, 2003, p. 240). As such, they provide criteria for constructing accounting technology consistent with agonistics-based CDAA.

Journal

Meditari Accountancy Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 21, 2021

Keywords: Agonistic pluralism; Accounting for non-financial matters; Participatory governance; Technologies of hubris; Technologies of humility; Critical dialogic accounting and accountability

References

  • Behind the World Bank’s ringing declarations of ‘social accountability’: Ghana’s public financial management reform
    Alawattage, C.; Azure, J.D.-C.
  • The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse
    Archel, P.; Husillos, J.; Spence, C.
  • The theory of reflexive modernization – problematic, hypotheses and research programme theory
    Beck, U.; Bonss, W.; Lau, C.
  • Public discourse and decision making: exploring possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting
    Boyce, G.
  • Accounting education
    Boyce, G.; Roslender, R.
  • More than imagination: making social and critical accounting real
    Boyce, G.; Greer, S.
  • Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: taking pluralism seriously
    Brown, J.
  • Democratizing accounting: reflections on the politics of ‘old’ and ‘new’ pluralisms
    Brown, J.
  • Integrated reporting: on the need for broadening out and opening up
    Brown, J.; Dillard, J.
  • Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: on opening up and closing down participatory governance
    Brown, J.; Dillard, J.
  • Opening accounting to critical scrutiny: towards dialogic accounting for policy analysis and democracy
    Brown, J.; Dillard, J.
  • Accounting education, democracy and sustainability: taking divergent perspectives seriously
    Brown, J.; Dillard, J.
  • Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through rancière: on the value of dissensus
    Brown, J.; Tregidga, H.
  • Accounting, accountants and accountability regimes in pluralistic societies: taking multiple perspectives seriously
    Brown, J.; Dillard, J.; Hopper, T.
  • Seeing through lies: teaching ideological literacy as a corrective lens
    Camangian, P.R.
  • Student imaginings, cognitive dissonance and critical thinking
    Chabrak, N.; Craig, R.
  • Teaching and learning only the language of numbers – monolingualism in a multilingual world
    Chua, W.F.
  • Hillsborough: the fight for accountability
    Cooper, C.; Lapsley, I.
  • A discussion of the political potential of social accounting
    Cooper, C.; Taylor, P.; Smith, N.; Catchpowle, L.
  • Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making
    Cooper, D.J.; Morgan, W.
  • Reporting systems for sustainability: what are they measuring?
    Davidson, K.M.
  • Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement
    Dawkins, C.
  • The rules are no game: from instrumental rationality to administrative evil
    Dillard, J.; Ruchala, L.
  • Critical dialogical accountability: from accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting
    Dillard, J.; Vinnari, E.
  • Exploring (false) dualisms for environmental accounting praxis
    Everett, J.
  • Dissent in consensusland: an agonistic problematization of multi-stakeholder governance
    Fougère, M.; Solitander, N.
  • Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability
    Frame, B.; Brown, J.
  • Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism
    Gallhofer, S.; Haslam, J.
  • Challenging the boundaries of the possible: participation, knowledge and power
    Gaventa, J.; Cornwall, A.
  • Organic salmon farming: risk perceptions, decision heuristics and the absence of environmental accounting
    Georgakopoulos, G.; Thomson, I.
  • The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?
    Gray, R.
  • New accounts: towards a reframing of social accounting
    Gray, R.; Brennan, A.; Malpas, J.
  • Knowledge, risk and Beck: misconceptions of expertise and risk
    Hanlon, G.
  • Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality
    Hines, R.
  • Technologies of humility
    Jasanoff, S.
  • Scientised citizens and democratised science: re-assessing the expert-lay divide
    Lidskog, R.
  • The social audit: a political view
    Medawar, C.
  • W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting
    Milne, M.J.; Gray, R.
  • Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice
    Morgan, G.
  • Democracy and pluralism: a critique of the rationalist approach
    Mouffe, C.
  • Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge
    Nowotny, H.
  • Observations on corporate financial reporting in the name of politics
    O’Leary, T.
  • Matter of opinion: exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting
    Puroila, J.; Mäkelä, H.
  • Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability
    Ravetz, J.R.
  • That’s just your opinion!’ – ‘American idol’ and the confusion between pluralism and relativism
    Ruitenberg, C.W.
  • The economics of endangered species: why less is more in the economic analysis of critical habitat designations
    Sinden, A.
  • Contesting public accountability: a dialogical exploration of accountability and social housing
    Smyth, S.
  • Democratizing economics: pluralism as a path towards sustainability
    Söderbaum, P.; Brown, J.
  • Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment
    Söderbaum, P.
  • The problem of environmental history: a re-reading of the field
    Sörlin, S.; Warde, P.
  • Social accounting's emancipatory potential: a Gramscian critique
    Spence, C.
  • Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology
    Stirling, A.
  • Surfacing the political: women’s empowerment, microfinance, critical dialogic accounting and accountability
    Tanima, F.A.; Brown, J.; Dillard, J.
  • Epistemic pluralism for knowledge transformation
    Teffo, L.
  • (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations
    Tregidga, H.; Milne, M.; Kearins, K.
  • Review of Managing Major Hazards: The Lessons of the Moura Mine Disaster by A. Hopkins
    Tucker, E.
  • Consensus conference on genetic testing: citizenship and technology
    Vandenabeele, J.; Goorden, L.
  • (ANT)agonistics: pluralistic politicization of, and by, accounting and its technologies
    Vinnari, E.; Dillard, J.
  • Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: response to Collins and Evans (2002)
    Wynne, B.
  • Passionate humility in interpretive policy and administrative analysis
    Yanow, D.
  • Ways of knowing: passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management
    Yanow, D.
  • Passionate humility: toward a philosophy of ethical will
    Yanow, D.; Willmott, H.; Jun, J.S.
  • Financialisation and the conceptual framework
    Zhang, J.; Andrew, J.