Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how governments create value

Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how... Drawing on Adams (2017a) conceptualisation of value creation by organisations published in the Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, the purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptualisation of how national governments can create value for society and the economy through their approach to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).Design/methodology/approachAn initial conceptual framework was developed from literature situated at the intersection of accountability, public policy and sustainability/sustainable development. The authors' review of extant research on national policy development on value creation, sustainability and the SDGs identified gaps in (understanding of) approaches to national accountability and national governance (by state and civil society) processes. The subsequent thematic analysis of 164 written submissions made to the Australian Senate inquiry on the SDGs between December 2017 and March 2018, together with transcripts of five public hearings where 49 individuals and organisations appeared as witnesses during the second half of 2018, focussed on addressing these gaps.FindingsInput to the Australian Senate Inquiry on the SDGs overwhelmingly emphasised the importance of transparency and stakeholder participation in accountability systems, commenting on data gathering, measuring and communicating. There was an emphasis on the need to involve all parts of society, including business, investors and civil society, and for strong central co-ordination by the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. These data allowed the authors to refine the conceptualisation of how national governments can enhance social and economic value through a focus on the UN SDGs and their approach to accounting, accountability and governance.Practical implicationsThe findings have implications: for national governments in developing approaches to achieve sustainable development; and, for supranational bodies such as the UN in developing agreements, frameworks and guidance for national governments.Originality/valueBuilding on the extant literature about how global governance should be engaged to improve accountability in achieving the SDGs, the conceptual framework developed through the study shifts focus to national governance and accountability, and provides a blueprint for national governments to create value for the economy and society in the face of global sustainable development issues. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal Emerald Publishing

Accountability and governance in pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals: conceptualising how governments create value

Download PDF
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/accountability-and-governance-in-pursuit-of-sustainable-development-nMn0NgIrUg
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3574
DOI
10.1108/aaaj-07-2020-4667
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Drawing on Adams (2017a) conceptualisation of value creation by organisations published in the Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, the purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptualisation of how national governments can create value for society and the economy through their approach to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).Design/methodology/approachAn initial conceptual framework was developed from literature situated at the intersection of accountability, public policy and sustainability/sustainable development. The authors' review of extant research on national policy development on value creation, sustainability and the SDGs identified gaps in (understanding of) approaches to national accountability and national governance (by state and civil society) processes. The subsequent thematic analysis of 164 written submissions made to the Australian Senate inquiry on the SDGs between December 2017 and March 2018, together with transcripts of five public hearings where 49 individuals and organisations appeared as witnesses during the second half of 2018, focussed on addressing these gaps.FindingsInput to the Australian Senate Inquiry on the SDGs overwhelmingly emphasised the importance of transparency and stakeholder participation in accountability systems, commenting on data gathering, measuring and communicating. There was an emphasis on the need to involve all parts of society, including business, investors and civil society, and for strong central co-ordination by the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. These data allowed the authors to refine the conceptualisation of how national governments can enhance social and economic value through a focus on the UN SDGs and their approach to accounting, accountability and governance.Practical implicationsThe findings have implications: for national governments in developing approaches to achieve sustainable development; and, for supranational bodies such as the UN in developing agreements, frameworks and guidance for national governments.Originality/valueBuilding on the extant literature about how global governance should be engaged to improve accountability in achieving the SDGs, the conceptual framework developed through the study shifts focus to national governance and accountability, and provides a blueprint for national governments to create value for the economy and society in the face of global sustainable development issues.

Journal

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 1, 2021

Keywords: Sustainable Development Goals; Government accounting and accountability; Value creation

References

  • Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process
    Adams, C.A.
  • The Sustainable Development Goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report, IIRC and ICAS
    Adams, C.A.
  • Towards implementation of sustainable development goals (SDG) in developing nations: a useful funding framework
    Akenroye, T.O.; Nygård, H.M.; Eyo, A.
  • Who will pay for the sustainable development goals
    Almassy, D.; Merill, L.; Czunyi, S.
  • Industry 4.0: empowering ASEAN for the circular economy
    Anbumozhi, V.; Kimura, F.
  • The systemic dimension of sustainable development in developing countries
    Bardy, R.; Rubens, A.; Massaro, M.
  • A shared perspective on public administration and international development
    Baimenov, A.; Everest-Phillips, M.
  • Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals
    Biermann, F.; Kanie, N.; Kim, R.E.
  • Public administration and the sustainable development goals
    Bouckaert, G.; Loretan, R.; Troupin, S.
  • Implementing the ‘sustainable development goals’: towards addressing three key governance challenges—collective action, trade-offs, and accountability
    Bowen, K.J.; Cradock-Henry, N.A.; Koch, F.; Patterson, J.; Häyhä, T.; Vogt, J.; Barbi, F.
  • Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy
    Bowman, C.; Ambrosini, V.
  • Do No harm and do more good too: connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political CSR theory
    Buhmann, K.; Jonsson, J.; Fisker, M.
  • Governing sustainability: Rio+ 20 and the road beyond
    Bulkeley, H.; Jordan, A.; Perkins, R.; Selin, H.
  • A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals
    Caiado, R.G.G.; Leal Filho, W.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; de Mattos Nascimento, D.L.; Ávila, L.V.
  • Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: a method for making it work in practice
    Calabrese, A.; Costa, R.; Ghiron, N.L.; Menichini, T.
  • Holistic innovation: an emerging paradigm
    Chen, J.; Yin, X.; Mei, L.
  • Advancing the governance of cross‐sectoral policies for sustainable development: a metagovernance perspective
    Christopoulos, S.; Horvath, B.; Kull, M.
  • Dialogic collaboration across sectors: partnering for sustainability
    Colaner, N.; Imanaka, J.L.; Prussia, G.E.
  • Planning for sustainability in non-democratic polities: the case of Masdar City
    Crot, L.
  • The role of governance in realising the transition towards sustainable societies
    Filho, L.W.; Platje, J.; Gerstlberger, W.; Ciegis, R.; Kääriä, J.; Klavins, M.; Kliucininkas, L.
  • Collaborative governance for the sustainable development goals
    Florini, A.; Pauli, M.
  • The potential for tackling inequality in the sustainable development goals
    Freistein, K.; Mahlert, B.
  • Global goals as a policy tool: intended and unintended consequences
    Fukuda-Parr, S.
  • Think globally, act locally: implementing the sustainable development goals in Montenegro
    Galli, A.; Đurović, G.; Hanscom, L.; Knežević, J.
  • Governance for achieving the sustainable development goals: how important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?
    Glass, L.-M.; Newig, J.
  • Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?
    Gray, R.
  • Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development
    Gupta, J.; Pouw, N.R.; Ros-Tonen, M.A.
  • Business sector efforts and challenges to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals
    Hayakawa, Y.
  • The sustainable development goals in South Africa: investigating the need for multi-stakeholder partnerships
    Haywood, L.K.; Funke, N.; Audouin, M.; Musvoto, C.; Nahman, A.
  • Integrated and participatory design of sustainable development strategies on multiple governance levels
    Heitmann, F.; Halbe, J.; Pahl-Wostl, C.
  • Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development?
    Hoque, N.; Rahman, A.R.A.; Molla, R.I.; Noman, A.H.M.; Bhuiyan, M.Z.H.
  • Compensation strategies to enact new governance frameworks for SDG transformations
    Horan, D.
  • Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting
    Kaur, A.; Lodhia, S.
  • Contradictions of global accountability: the world bank, development NGOs, and global social governance
    Kim, T.
  • Urban sustainability strategies guided by the SDGs—a tale of four Cities
    Krellenberg, K.; Bergsträßer, H.; Bykova, D.; Kress, N.; Tyndall, K.
  • Governing towards sustainability—conceptualising modes of governance
    Lange, P.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Sauer, A.; Bornemann, B.; Burger, P.
  • Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus–the scope of action for institutional change
    Märker, C.; Venghaus, S.; Hake, J.-F.
  • Transforming global governance in the post-2015 era: towards an equitable and sustainable world
    McKeon, N.
  • Common but differentiated governance: a metagovernance approach to make the SDGs work
    Meuleman, L.; Niestroy, I.
  • Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices
    Narayanan, V.; Adams, C.A.
  • Achieving the sustainable development agenda: the governance–conflict nexus
    Nygård, H.M.
  • Accountability in international governance and the 2030 development agenda
    Ocampo, J.A.; Gómez‐Arteaga, N.
  • Terms of reference
  • The normative justification of integrative stakeholder engagement: a habermasian view on responsible leadership
    Patzer, M.; Voegtlin, C.; Scherer, A.G.
  • Public administration for development: trends and the way forward
    Puppim de Oliveira, J.A.; Jing, Y.; Collins, P.
  • Harnessing the sustainable development goals for businesses: a progressive framework for action
    Redman, A.
  • The politics of sustainability and development
    Scoones, I.
  • Good governance as a tool of sustainable development
    Stojanović, I.; Ateljević, J.; Stević, R.S.
  • Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges
    Turnheim, B.; Berkhout, F.; Geels, F.; Hof, A.; McMeekin, A.; Nykvist, B.; van Vuuren, D.
  • Governance for sustainable development: a framework
    van Zeijl‐Rozema, A.; Cörvers, R.; Kemp, R.; Martens, P.
  • A “fair go” in the lucky country? Gender equality and the Australian case
    Voola, A.P.; Beavis, K.; Mundkur, A.