Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Chassy (2002)
Food Safety Evaluation of Crops Produced through BiotechnologyJournal of the American College of Nutrition, 21
CEC
Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe, Progress Report and Future Orientations
L. Lähteenmäki, K. Grunert, Ø. Ueland, A. Åström, A. Arvola, T. Bech-Larsen (2002)
Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternativeFood Quality and Preference, 13
A. Thorpe, Catherine Robinson (2004)
When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organismsAgriculture and Human Values, 21
L. Frewer, Chaya Howard, D. Hedderley, R. Shepherd (1999)
Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasivenessPublic Understanding of Science, 8
G. Gruère (2006)
A preliminary comparison of the retail level effects of genetically modified food labelling policies in Canada and FranceFood Policy, 31
J. Knight, D. Mather, D. Holdsworth (2005)
Impact of genetic modification on country image of imported food products in European markets: Perceptions of channel membersFood Policy, 30
WHO
Modern Food Biotechnology, Human Health and Development: An Evidence‐based Study
GM Science Review
An Open Review of the Science Relevant to GM Crops and Food Based on the Interests and Concerns of the Public
C. Arntzen, A. Coghlan, Brian Johnson, J. Peacock, M. Rodemeyer (2003)
GM crops: science, politics and communicationNature Reviews Genetics, 4
M. Magnusson, U. Hursti (2002)
Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foodsAppetite, 39
EFSA
European Food Safety Authority
B. Roe, M. Teisl (2007)
Genetically modified food labeling: The impacts of message and messenger on consumer perceptions of labels and productsFood Policy, 32
A. Batrinou, E. Dimitriou, Dionisios Liatsos, V. Pletsa (2005)
Genetically modified foods: the effect of informationNutrition & Food Science, 35
A. Shaw (2002)
“It just goes against the grain.” Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UKPublic Understanding of Science, 11
I. Arvanitoyannis, A. Krystallis (2005)
Consumers’ beliefs, attitudes and intentions towards genetically modified foods, based on the ’perceived safety vs. benefits’ perspectiveInternational Journal of Food Science and Technology, 40
European Union
Food Safety: GM‐Food and‐Feed Proposal
G. Gaskell, N. Allum, S. Stares, Björn Fjæstad, Susanna Öhman, A. Olofsson (2003)
Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society"
K. Grunert, L. Bredahl, J. Scholderer (2003)
Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food productionInnovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 4
C. James
Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2006
Europa
Food & Feed Safety: Biotechnology‐Labelling
B. Moseley (2002)
Safety Assessment and Public Concern for Genetically Modified Food Products: The European ViewToxicologic Pathology, 30
P. Tenbült, N. Vries, Ellen Dreezens, C. Martijn (2007)
Categorizing genetically modified food products: Effects of labelling on information processingBritish Food Journal, 109
Eurobarometer 64.3
Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends
Michael O’Fallon, D. Gursoy, Nancy Swanger (2007)
To buy or not to buy: Impact of labeling on purchasing intentions of genetically modified foodsInternational Journal of Hospitality Management, 26
U. Hursti, Maria Magnusson (2003)
Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods. What kind of knowledge matters?Appetite, 41
G. Kleter, A. Peijnenburg, H. Aarts (2005)
Health Considerations Regarding Horizontal Transfer of Microbial Transgenes Present in Genetically Modified CropsJournal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2005
GAO
United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters: Genetically Modified Foods
G. Gaskell, N. Allum, S. Stares
Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002, Eurobarometer 58.0
W. Huffman (2003)
Consumers' Acceptance of (and Resistance to) Genetically Modified Foods in High-Income Countries: Effects of Labels and Information in an Uncertain EnvironmentAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85
R. Braun (2002)
People's concerns about biotechnology: some problems and some solutions.Journal of biotechnology, 98 1
I.M. Sheldon
Regulation of biotechnology: will we ever ‘freely’ trade GMOs?
Europa
Food & Feed Safety: GM Food & Feed Authorisation
J. Lusk, Melissa Moore, Lisa House, B. Morrow (2001)
INFLUENCE OF BRAND NAME AND TYPE OF MODIFICATION ON CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CORN CHIPS: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSISThe International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4
S. Bonny (2003)
Why are most Europeans opposed to GMOs? Factors explaining rejection in France and EuropeElectronic Journal of Biotechnology, 6
M. Loureiro, S. Hine (2004)
Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policiesFood Policy, 29
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how label information may affect the acceptability by young consumers of a food produced by genetic engineering methods. Design/methodology/approach – A popular snack derived from maize (corn chip) was presented with five different labels (“organic corn”, “conventional corn”, “product that contains genetically modified (GM) corn”, “product that contains GM corn approved by EU”, “non‐classified corn”) to 229 university students in Greece in order to taste it. Findings – The results obtained showed that the GM label evoked a deeply rooted negative attitude as more than half of participants (63 per cent) refused to taste even a single piece of the product. The product labelled “GM but approved by EU” was viewed as more credible but still 28 per cent refused to sample. The conclusion was that although the feeling of trust increased considerably when the label message was supported by a certifying authority, a large proportion (almost one third) of participants refused to taste a product that had been approved by the EU for nearly a decade. Practical implications – This result demonstrated in an emphatic way a degree of phobia concerning GM food and the importance of carefully worded labelling. Originality/value – The attitude of consumers after direct experience with a GM food product had never been reported for Greece and these findings may serve as an exploratory tool for further investigations on GM food related attitudes.
British Food Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 21, 2008
Keywords: Labelling; Perception; Greece; Consumer behaviour; Food production; Genetic modification
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.