Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2003b)
IMS learning design information model. Final specification, technical report
Steve Loddington, K. Pond, Nicola Wilkinson, P. Willmot (2009)
A case study of the development of WebPA: An online peer-moderated marking toolBr. J. Educ. Technol., 40
M. Galton (2010)
Assessing Group Work
(2003a)
IMS-LD best practice and implementation guide. Final specification, technical report
R. Koper (2001)
Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind EML
L. Moccozet, Camille Tardy, Wanda Opprecht, M. Léonard (2013)
Gamification-based assessment of group work2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL)
(2004)
Pépites et lingots: Des logiciels pour faciliter la régulation par les enseignants des apprentissages en algèbre
Amina Aouine, L. Mahdaoui (2014)
A platform based on a LMS/ WfMS for support the assessment of collaborative activities in e-learning2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL)
Fahima Hajjej, Y. Hlaoui, Leila Ayed (2013)
A specification approach based on adapted workflow for personalized e-assessment systemsFourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)
M. Caeiro, L. Anido-Rifón, M. Llamas (2003)
A Critical Analysis of IMS Learning Design
J. Yong, Jun Yan, Xiaodi Huang (2006)
WFMS-based Data Integration for e-Learning2006 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design
P. Willmot, A. Crawford (2007)
Peer review of team marks using a web-based tool: an evaluationEngineering Education, 2
G. Durand (2006)
La scénarisation de l’évaluation des activités pédagogiques utilisant les environnements informatiques d’apprentissage humain
(1996)
Le projet groupware
Kyungrog Kim, Nammee Moon (2018)
A model for collecting and analyzing action data in a learning process based on activity theorySoft Computing, 22
T. Ellis, W. Hafner (2007)
Assessing collaborative, project-based learning experiences: Drawing from three data sources2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports
B. Green, R. Bock, L. Humphreys, R. Linn, M. Reckase (1984)
TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 21
V. Rodilla (2007)
Peer assessment as an approach to judge group work: does it work? Edusfarm, revista d’educació superior en Farmàcia
(1998)
Groupware & workflow
L. Mahdaoui (2008)
Proposition d’une infrastructure statique et dynamique pour le support du travail collaboratif: application au tutorat dans le e-learning
A. Baba, F. Cin, Didem Bakanay (2012)
A fuzzy system for evaluating students' project in engineering educationComputer Applications in Engineering Education, 20
Davide Middleton (2018)
Introducing the Arduino to novice studentsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 33
M. Goyal, K. Rajalakshmi (2018)
Personalization of Test Sheet Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy in E-Learning System Using Genetic Algorithm
(2003)
Modélisation et production d’objets pédagogiques
Christian Saul, H. Wuttke (2013)
Assessment 3.0 meets engineering sciences2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL)
A. Bhalerao, A. Ward (2011)
Towards electronically assisted a case studyResearch in Learning Technology, 9
(2003)
Objets pédagogiques: Unités d’apprentissage, activités ou ressources?
H. Hermans, J. Janssen, R. Koper (2016)
Flexible authoring and delivery of online courses using IMS Learning DesignInteractive Learning Environments, 24
Héla Miniaoui, Avneet Kaur (2014)
‘A discussion forum’: a blended learning assessment tool to enhance students’ learningInternational Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16
Selvia Kusuma, Rinanza Alhamri (2018)
Generating Indonesian Question Automatically Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy Using Template Based MethodKinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control
(1996)
WfMC-TC-1011
L. Mahdaoui, Z. Alimazighi (2008)
Distant tutoring using flexible workflow design: an application to product management coursesInternational Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 3
(2004)
L’exploitation d’objets pédagogiques interactifs à distance: Le projet FORMID
A. Domínguez, Joseba Saenz-de-Navarrete, Luis Marcos, Luis Sanz, Carmen Pagés-Arévalo, José-Javier Martínez (2013)
Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomesComput. Educ., 63
Y. Aprilinda, A. Sukoco, A. Cucus (2014)
Implementation of Workflow Management System on E-Learning Platform for the Effectiveness of Distance Learning
Fahima Hajjej, Y. Hlaoui, Leila Ayed (2014)
Adapted e-Assessment System: Based on Workflow Refinement
S. George, P. Leroux (2001)
Un environnement support de projets collectifs entre apprenants : SPLACH, 8
Patricia Cuevas, P. Muñoz-Merino, Carmen Fernández-Panadero, C. Kloos (2013)
CourseEditor: A course planning tool compatible with IMS‐LDComputer Applications in Engineering Education, 21
C. Ellis, J. Wainer (1994)
A conceptual model of groupware
(1999)
Réingénierie du développement d’application, Méthodes, processus, techniques et pratiques de conduite de projet sous contraintes
J. Dougherty (2017)
Assessment of a problem-based learning activity in a high performance scientific computing course, 33
Zhiqiang Ma, Xuejing Yan, Qiyun Wang (2018)
Assessing individual contribution in collaborative learning through self- and peer-assessment in the context of ChinaInnovations in Education and Teaching International, 57
Daniel Peraya, Bérénice Jaccaz (2004)
Analyser, soutenir, et piloter l'innovation : un modèle « ASPI »
H. Fuks (2000)
Groupware technologies for education in AulaNetComputer Applications in Engineering Education, 8
(2004)
Analyse automatique de conversations textuelles synchrone d’apprenants pour la détermination de comportements sociaux
Maria Boubouka, K. Papanikolaou (2013)
Alternative assessment methods in technology enhanced project-based learningInt. J. Learn. Technol., 8
M. Cesarini, Mattia Monga, Roberto Tedesco (2004)
Carrying on the e-learning process with a workflow management engine
B. Passardière, Pierre Jarraud (2004)
ManUeL, un profil d'application de LOM pour C@mpuSciences, 11
E. Sander, Jean-François Nicaud, Hamid Chaachoua, Marie-Caroline Croset (2005)
From usage analysis to automatic diagnosis: The case of the learning of algebra
Mingyu Feng, N. Heffernan, K. Koedinger (2009)
Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it assessesUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19
M. Palomo-duarte, J. Dodero, I. Medina-Bulo, E. Rodríguez-Posada, Iván Ruiz-Rube (2014)
Assessment of collaborative learning experiences by graphical analysis of wiki contributionsInteractive Learning Environments, 22
K. Saikali (2001)
Flexibilité des workflows par l’approche objet: 2FLOW, un framework pour Workflow flexibles
Yeonjeong Park, I. Jo (2017)
Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theoryAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42
Riccardo Mazza, Christian Milani (2005)
Exploring Usage Analysis in Learning Systems: Gaining Insights From Visualisations
S. Caballé, F. Xhafa, A. Abraham (2008)
Towards an automatic real-time assessment of online discussions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning practices2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management
P. Agarwal (2019)
Retrieval Practice & Bloom’s Taxonomy: Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before Higher Order Learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 111
I. Serbec, Mateja Strnad, J. Rugelj (2010)
Assessment of wiki-supported collaborative learning in higher education2010 9th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)
E. Hettiarachchi, M. Huertas, Enric Mor, Ana-Elena Guerrero-Roldán (2015)
Improving student performance in high cognitive level courses by using formative e-assessmentInternational Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7
Alla Anohina-Naumeca (2015)
Justifying the usage of concept mapping as a tool for the formative assessment of the structural knowledge of engineering studentsKnowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 7
The purpose of this paper is to focus on assessing individuals’ problems in learning groups/teams and should lead to the assessment of the group/team itself as a learning entity.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, an extension of the IMS-Learning Design (IMS-LD) meta-model is proposed in order to support the assessment of collaborative activities in e-learning. Besides, the software architecture which consists of a set of components forming a web wizard to create, track and assess the collaborative assessment processes is described as to support that extension of the IMS-LD meta-model.FindingsWith the proposed solution we can: make assessment fairer using individual and collective assessment indicators to assign final scores to learners; make an assessment step by step for better individual and collective monitoring activities; and divide the assessment into lighter phases for the correctors. Consequently, the evaluator will have more detailed information about his/her students and the quality of judgment will be better. This could also be useful for the evaluator in order to plan further examinations.Research limitations/implicationsFurther experimentations are necessary to test the effectiveness of the proposed system in order to analyze its performances under a massive usage. In addition, the authors plan to use a survey to collect learners’ opinions to know the effectiveness of the proposal in terms of fairness in the assessment of collaborative activities in an online community.Originality/valueThis paper addresses important issues in the educational area, especially assessment of collaborative activities. In fact, to reduce subjectivity and increase fairness in assessing learners in collaborative work, for example, using the peer assessment, in order to try reducing subjectivity and fairly assessing learners. However, while assessing group work, the same mark is attributed for all group members and authors have concluded that it is not the right approach to make a fair and more objective assessment.
The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 20, 2019
Keywords: E-learning; Assessment; Collaborative activities; Assessment strategies; IMS-LD; WfMS/LMS platform
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.