Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Argues that a TQM programme can reduce the COPQ cost of poor quality by between 20 and 40 per cent. Suggests benchmarking is the first step to estimate an organisations minimum level of waste by comparing itself with the market leader in its sector, then to examine longterm performance indicators, bringing in intangibles such as training and skills. Uses graphs to portray the evolution of the window of opportunity for TQM and examines the consequences of nonoptimum strategies. In a series of relatively complex examples, it concludes that waste is waiting to be retrieved by a quality programme.
The TQM Magazine – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.