Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A voluntary safe table to help competitive organizations collaborate on improving quality

A voluntary safe table to help competitive organizations collaborate on improving quality Purpose – Four Washington State associations came together to form a novel organization in response to rising healthcare sector costs, coupled with the need to ensure efficient provision of high quality care that improves health outcomes. This article seeks to explain the work and progress of that organization. Design/methodology/approach – The article takes the form of a historical narrative. Findings – The initiative has evolved from reliance on grants to becoming self‐funding, expanded the scope of its activities, and satisfied the needs of the stakeholders. Practical implications – This organizational model is more efficient than going it alone on every effort, and may be a desirable solution for other communities. Originality/value – This is the first published description of a unique, non‐profit organization founded in 1998, which can serve as a model for other regions that wish to promote collaborative benchmarking among competitive independent health care providers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Governance: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

A voluntary safe table to help competitive organizations collaborate on improving quality

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-voluntary-safe-table-to-help-competitive-organizations-collaborate-Id88YdY5Hx
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7274
DOI
10.1108/14777271111170616
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Four Washington State associations came together to form a novel organization in response to rising healthcare sector costs, coupled with the need to ensure efficient provision of high quality care that improves health outcomes. This article seeks to explain the work and progress of that organization. Design/methodology/approach – The article takes the form of a historical narrative. Findings – The initiative has evolved from reliance on grants to becoming self‐funding, expanded the scope of its activities, and satisfied the needs of the stakeholders. Practical implications – This organizational model is more efficient than going it alone on every effort, and may be a desirable solution for other communities. Originality/value – This is the first published description of a unique, non‐profit organization founded in 1998, which can serve as a model for other regions that wish to promote collaborative benchmarking among competitive independent health care providers.

Journal

Clinical Governance: An International JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 9, 2011

Keywords: Collaboration; Quality improvement; Patient care; Outcomes

References