Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rajeev Sharma, P. Yetton (2003)
The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems ImplementationMIS Q., 27
Gefen, Rigdon, Straub (2011)
Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science ResearchManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 35
D. Bajwa, Arun Rai, I. Brennan (1998)
Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approachDecis. Support Syst., 22
Arun Rai, Ravi Patnayakuni, Nainika Seth (2006)
Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration CapabilitiesMIS Q., 30
J. Recker (2014)
Suggestions for the next wave of BPM research : strengthening the theoretical core and exploring the protective beltScience & Engineering Faculty
S. Petter, D. Straub, Arun Rai (2007)
Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems ResearchMIS Q., 31
Mark Winter, Charles Smith, P. Morris, S. Cicmil (2006)
Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research networkInternational Journal of Project Management, 24
Winston Lin, Benjamin Shao (2000)
The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approachInf. Manag., 37
D. Gefen, Edward Rigdon, D. Straub (2011)
An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science ResearchManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 35
(2003)
Business process management: the third wave: Meghan-Kiffer Press Tampa
Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 15
A. Hjalmarsson, J. Recker, M. Rosemann, M. Lind (2015)
Understanding the Behavior of Workshop Facilitators in Systems Analysis and Design Projects: Developing Theory from Process Modeling ProjectsCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 36
T. Papadopoulos, U. Ojiako, M. Chipulu, Kwangwook Lee (2012)
The Criticality of Risk Factors in Customer Relationship Management ProjectsProject Management Journal, 43
R. Dijkman, M. Rosa, H. Reijers (2012)
Managing large collections of business process models - Current techniques and challengesComput. Ind., 63
Meera Kesari, Shanton Chang, Peter Seddon (2003)
A content-analytic study of the advantages and disadvantages of process modelling
Isel Oca, M. Snoeck, H. Reijers, Abel Rodríguez-Morffi (2015)
A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling qualityInf. Softw. Technol., 58
Laden Aldin, Sergio Cesare
Please Scroll down for Article Enterprise Information Systems a Literature Review on Business Process Modelling: New Frontiers of Reusability a Literature Review on Business Process Modelling: New Frontiers of Reusability
C. Beringer, D. Jonas, H. Gemünden (2012)
Establishing Project Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Internal Stakeholders’ InteractionsProject Management Journal, 43
A. Diamantopoulos, Petra Riefler, Katharina Roth (2008)
Advancing formative measurement models
J. Danks, K. Ericsson, Herbert Simon (1984)
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
W. Bandara, G. Gable, M. Rosemann (2005)
Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case studyEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 14
Steven Meier (2008)
Best Project Management and Systems Engineering Practices in the Preacquisition Phase for Federal Intelligence and Defense AgenciesProject Management Journal, 39
A. Diamantopoulos, H. Winklhofer (2001)
Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale DevelopmentJournal of Marketing Research, 38
B. Heijden (1999)
The Measurement and Development of Professional Expertise throughout the Career. A retrospective study among higher level Dutch professionals
M. Indulska, J. Recker, M. Rosemann, Peter Green (2009)
Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges
(2006)
Business process modeling success: An empirically tested measurement model. Paper presented at the International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, USA
Scott MacKenzie, P. Podsakoff, Nathan Podsakoff (2011)
Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing TechniquesMIS Q., 35
Cheryl Jarvis, Scott MacKenzie, P. Podsakoff (2003)
A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 30
Peter Seddon, Sandy Staples, Ravi Patnayakuni, Matthew Bowtell (1999)
Dimensions of Information Systems SuccessCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2
J. McKeen, T. Guimaraes, James Wetherbe (1994)
The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency FactorsMIS Q., 18
(2014)
Critical Success Factors for Crisis Recovery Management: A Case Study of
Hsi-Peng Lu, Jyun-Yu Wang (1997)
The relationships between management styles, user participation, and system success over MIS growth stagesInf. Manag., 32
(2007)
Part VI: Generizable mechanisms mediating expertise and general issues In
(2007)
Part VI: Generizable mechanisms mediating expertise and general issues
P. Andreev, Tsipi Heart, H. Maoz, N. Pliskin (2009)
Validating Formative Partial Least Squares (PLS) Models: Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration
W. Bandara (2007)
Process modelling success factors and measures
(2006)
Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Research
Enterprise Information Systems, 5
D. Finkelstein (2005)
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation ModelingTechnometrics, 47
Peter Seddon, Min-Yen Kiew (1994)
A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success
C.M. Ringle, S. Wende, A. Will (2005)
SmartPLS
Milind Padalkar, S. Gopinath (2016)
Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunitiesInternational Journal of Project Management, 34
B. Byrne (1984)
The General/Academic Self-Concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation ResearchReview of Educational Research, 54
C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 18
S. Cicmil, T. Williams, J. Thomas, D. Hodgson (2006)
Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 24
J. Thong, C. Yap, K. Raman (1996)
Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses
J. Rockart (1979)
Chief executives define their own data needs.Harvard business review, 57 2
(1980)
The measurement of expertise: Analysis of the development of knowledge and skill as a basis for assessing achievement
P. Frazier, A. Tix, K. Barron (2004)
Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51
Weiyong Zhang, Xiaobo Xu (2008)
Six Sigma and Information Systems Project Management: A Revised Theoretical ModelProject Management Journal, 39
W. Bandara, G. Gable, M. Rosemann (2006)
Business Processing Modeling Success: An Empirically Tested Measurement Model
Stefan Oppl, Thomas Rothschädl (2014)
Separation of Concerns in Model Elicitation - Role-Based Actor-Driven Business Process Modeling
Wynne Chin, Barbara Marcolin, P. Newsted (2003)
A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption StudyInf. Syst. Res., 14
A. Burton-Jones, D. Straub (2006)
Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical TestInf. Syst. Res., 17
J. Henseler, C. Ringle, R. Sinkovics (2009)
The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing
J. Fortune, Diana White (2006)
Framing of project critical success factors by a systems modelInternational Journal of Project Management, 24
K. Campiranon, N. Scott (2014)
Critical Success Factors for Crisis Recovery Management: A Case Study of Phuket HotelsJournal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31
Ronald Cenfetelli, Geneviève Bassellier (2009)
Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems ResearchMIS Q., 33
Markus Laursen, Per Svejvig (2016)
Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practiceInternational Journal of Project Management, 34
R. Powers, G. Dickson (1973)
MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and RealityCalifornia Management Review, 15
J. Holt (2005)
A Pragmatic Guide to Business Process Modelling
C. Franz, D. Robey (1987)
Strategies for research on information systems in organizations. A critical analysis of research purpose and time frame
Wynne Chin (1998)
The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling.
B. Zimmerman (2006)
Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs.
B. Kaplan, D. Duchon (1988)
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study
Howard Smith, Peter Fingar (2003)
Business Process Management: The Third Wave
H. Watson, K. Taylor, Guy Higgins, Christopher Kadlec, Michael Meeks (1999)
Leaders Assess the Current State of the Academic IS DisciplineCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 2
W. Doll (1987)
Encouraging user management participation in systems designInf. Manag., 13
(2018)
Fundamentals of business process management (2nd ed.)
Business process modelling (BPMo) projects are core to digital transformation projects as they provide the conceptual foundation to the orchestration of technologies along a process. Yet, success factors of BPMo projects have received little research attention to date. This study empirically validates a BPMo project success model, pointing to normative practice guidelines and important future research.Design/methodology/approachThis research reports on the quantitative re-specification and validation of a business process modelling success model, employing survey responses from 261 process modellers worldwide.FindingsThe study distilled and validated a final set of success antecedents: Top Management Support, Project Management Capabilities, Stakeholder Input, Modeller Expertise and Modelling Tool Usage; and clearly evidences their relationships with each other and with two moderating variables – Importance and Complexity. The paper offers a nuanced explanation of the indirect role of top management support in building stakeholder involvement and explains how complex projects that are perceived as important being more likely to attract high levels of necessary stakeholder involvement. The authors conclude that top management needs to create an environment of co-ordinated excellence which spans both technical skills and resources, and a high level of committed engagement between stakeholders and technicians in order for BPMo projects to succeed.Originality/valueThis study is the first to operationalize and quantitatively test antecedents of BPMo project success and their interactions, presenting novel insights into how the success factors interact. Awareness of the more influential antecedents of successful process modelling projects offers valuable guidance for the planning, management and conduct of BPMo projects.
Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 10, 2021
Keywords: Business process modelling; Success factors; Success measurement; Moderation; Survey research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.