Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics

A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a systematic analysis of academic research that relies on the collection and use of Twitter data, creating topology of Twitter research that details the disciplines and methods of analysis, amount of tweets and users under analysis, the methods used to collect Twitter data, and accounts of ethical considerations related to these projects. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis of 382 academic publications from 2006 to 2012 that used Twitter as their primary platform for data collection and analysis. Findings – The analysis of over 380 scholarly publications utilizing Twitter data reveals noteworthy trends related to the growth of Twitter‐based research overall, the disciplines engaged in such research, the methods of acquiring Twitter data for analysis, and emerging ethical considerations of such research. Research limitations/implications – The findings provide a benchmark analysis that must be updated with the continued growth of Twitter‐based research. Originality/value – The research is the first full‐text systematic analysis of Twitter‐based research projects, focussing on the growth in discipline and methods as well as its ethical implications. It is of value for the broader research community currently engaged in social media‐based research, and will prompt reflexive evaluation of what research is occurring, how it is occurring, what is being done with Twitter data, and how researchers are addressing the ethics of Twitter‐based research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Aslib Journal of Information Management Emerald Publishing

A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-topology-of-twitter-research-disciplines-methods-and-ethics-0KawBjHhac
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2050-3806
DOI
10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a systematic analysis of academic research that relies on the collection and use of Twitter data, creating topology of Twitter research that details the disciplines and methods of analysis, amount of tweets and users under analysis, the methods used to collect Twitter data, and accounts of ethical considerations related to these projects. Design/methodology/approach – Content analysis of 382 academic publications from 2006 to 2012 that used Twitter as their primary platform for data collection and analysis. Findings – The analysis of over 380 scholarly publications utilizing Twitter data reveals noteworthy trends related to the growth of Twitter‐based research overall, the disciplines engaged in such research, the methods of acquiring Twitter data for analysis, and emerging ethical considerations of such research. Research limitations/implications – The findings provide a benchmark analysis that must be updated with the continued growth of Twitter‐based research. Originality/value – The research is the first full‐text systematic analysis of Twitter‐based research projects, focussing on the growth in discipline and methods as well as its ethical implications. It is of value for the broader research community currently engaged in social media‐based research, and will prompt reflexive evaluation of what research is occurring, how it is occurring, what is being done with Twitter data, and how researchers are addressing the ethics of Twitter‐based research.

Journal

Aslib Journal of Information Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 2014

Keywords: Social media; Privacy; Twitter; Research ethics; Internet research ethics; Twitter analytics

References

  • Framework for crawling and local event detection using twitter data
    Bakshi, H.
  • Twitter mood predicts the stock market
    Bollen, J.; Mao, H.; Zeng, X.
  • Bibliography of research on twitter & microblogging
    Boyd, D.
  • Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
    Boyd, D.; Ellison, N.
  • # Qldfloods and@ QPSMedia: crisis communication on Twitter in the 2011 south east Queensland floods
    Bruns, A.; Burgess, J.E.; Crawford, K.; Shaw, F.
  • Bridging the distance: removing the technology buffer and seeking consistent ethical analysis in computer security research
    Carpenter, K.; Dittrich, D.
  • Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world
    Earle, P.S.; Bowden, D.C.; Guy, M.
  • Ethical decision‐making and internet research: recommendations from the Aoir Ethics Working Committee
    Ess, C.; Jones, S.
  • Iran protests: Twitter, the medium of the movement
    Grossman, L.
  • Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter
    Honeycutt, C.; Herring, S.
  • Facebook and Twitter key to Arab Spring uprisings: report – The National
    Huang, C.
  • ‘Elections’ or ‘selections’? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 general elections
    Ifukor, P.
  • Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth
    Jansen, B.J.; Zhang, M.; Sobel, K.; Chowdury, A.
  • Reflections on #occupy everywhere: social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation
    Juris, J.
  • Psychological research online: opportunities and challenges
    Kraut, R.; Olson, J.; Banaji, M.; Bruckman, A.; Cohen, J.; Couper, M.
  • Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web
    Lampos, V.; Cristianini, N.
  • Analyst: Twitter passed 500M users in June 2012, 140M of them in US; Jakarta ‘biggest tweeting’ city | TechCrunch
    Lunden, I.
  • Loose tweets: an analysis of privacy leaks on Twitter
    Mao, H.; Shuai, X.; Kapadia, A.
  • Ethical decision‐making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0)
    Markham, A.; Buchanan, E.
  • RT@ IWantPrivacy: widespread violation of privacy settings in the Twitter social network
    Meeder, B.; Tam, J.; Kelley, P.G.; Cranor, L.F.
  • Twitter kills the API whitelist: what it means for developers & innovation
    Melanson, M.
  • New media, networking and phatic culture
    Miller, V.
  • Twitter data analysis: an investor’s perspective
    Moore, R.
  • Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams
    Naaman, M.; Boase, J.; Lai, C.H.
  • With APIs it's caveat structor – developer beware
    Ramji, S.
  • How tweet it is!: library acquires entire Twitter archive
    Raymond, M.
  • Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter
    Romero, D.M.; Meeder, B.; Kleinberg, J.
  • Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real‐time event detection by social sensors
    Sakaki, T.; Okazaki, M.; Matsuo, Y.
  • The end of TwapperKeeper? (and what to do about it)
    Sample, M.
  • The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic
    Signorini, A.; Segre, A.M.; Polgreen, P.M.
  • Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions
    Tenopir, C.; Allard, S.; Douglass, K.; Aydinoglu, A.U.; Wu, L.; Read, E.; Manoff, M.; Frame, M.
  • Youtube, Twitter and the occupy movement
    Thorson, K.; Driscoll, K.; Ekdale, B.; Edgerly, S.; Thompson, L.G.; Schrock, A.; Swartz, L.; Vraga, E.K.; Wells, C.
  • Developer rules of the road
    Twitter
  • The ethics of Twitter research
    Vieweg, S.
  • How recent changes to Twitter's terms of service might hurt academic research
    Watters, A.
  • Twitter and Society
    Weller, K.; Bruns, A.; Burgess, J.; Mahrt, M.; Puschmann, C.
  • What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers
    Williams, S.; Terras, M.; Warwick, C.
  • Who says what to whom on Twitter
    Wu, S.; Hofman, J.M.; Mason, W.A.; Watts, D.J.
  • Predicting stock market indicators through Twitter ‘i hope it is not as bad as i fear’
    Zhang, X.; Fuehres, H.; Gloor, P.A.
  • Is it ethical to harvest public Twitter accounts without consent?
    Zimmer, M.