Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Linden, J. Fenn
Understanding Gartner's hype cycles
S. Kramer (1949)
Schooldays: A Sumerian Composition Relating to the Education of a ScribeJournal of the American Oriental Society, 69
J. Lanier (2009)
You Are Not a Gadget
B.S. Bloom
Learning for mastery. Evaluation comment
Michael Power (2008)
The Emergence of a Blended Online Learning Environment
D. Tapscott
Google generation has no need for rote learning
G. Bowker, S. Star (1999)
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Next generation learning challenges ”
(2005)
Higher education, blended learning, and the generations: Knowledge is power no more
C. Dziuban, Joel Hartman, Thomas Cavanagh, Patsy Moskal (2011)
Blended Courses as Drivers of Institutional Transformation
E. Masie
Blended learning: the magic is in the mix
M. Oliver, K. Trigwell (2005)
Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed?E-Learning and Digital Media, 2
(2004)
Three ALN modalities: an institutional perspective
(1968)
Learning for mastery
K. Meyer (2005)
Common Metaphors and Their Impact on Distance Education: What They Tell Us and What They Hide.Teachers College Record, 107
Steven Johnson (2010)
Where Good Ideas Come From
Maiko Spiess (2010)
Sorting Things Out - Classification and Its ConsequencesReciis, 4
Myron Swack (1970)
Educational Administration as a Social ProcessPhysical Therapy, 50
Clay Shirky (2009)
Here comes everybody
K. Morse
Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment
L. Kearns, Barbara Frey (2010)
Web 2.0 Technologies and Back Channel Communication in an Online Learning CommunityTechtrends, 54
P. Hinssen
The New Normal
Curtis Bonk, Charles Graham, J. Cross, M. Moore (2005)
The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs
Anthony Picciano, C. Dziuban, Charles Graham (2007)
Blended Learning: Research Perspectives
C. Dziuban (2006)
Blended learning enters the mainstream
D. Garrison, N. Vaughan (2007)
Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines, 2
Sloan Consortium
Evidence to practice: fulfilling the promise
S. Johnson
Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation
Ambient Insight
2011 Learning and Performance Technology Research Taxonomy
Purpose – This paper seeks to outline a time‐based strategy for blended learning that illustrates course design and delivery by framing students' learning opportunities in synchronous and asynchronous modalities. Design/methodology/approach – This paper deconstructs the evolving components of blended learning in order to identify changes induced by digital technologies for enhancing teaching and learning environments. Findings – This paper hypothesizes that blended learning may be traced back to early medieval times when printed material provided the first asynchronous learning opportunities. However, the digitalization of contemporary learning environments results in a de‐emphasis on teaching and learning spaces. When time becomes the primary organizing construct for education in a technology‐supported environment, blending possibilities emerge around five components: migration, support, location, learner empowerment, and flow. Research limitations/implications – This study enables the readers to conceptualize blended learning as a combination of modern media, communication modes, times and places in a new kind of learning synthesis in place of traditional classrooms and technology with the teacher serving as a facilitator of a collective learning process. Practical implications – The major implication of this paper is that modern learning technologies have freed students and educators from the lock in of classroom space as being the primary component of blended learning, thereby emphasizing learning rather than teaching in the planning process. Originality/value – This paper proposes a new model of blended learning in which physical teaching environments give way to time. Time and synchronicity become the primary elements of the learning environments. In addition, the authors suggest that the time‐based model as an educational “new normal” results in technologies as enablers rather than disruptors of learning continuity.
On the Horizon – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 16, 2011
Keywords: Blended learning; New normal; Time‐based learning; Universities; Digital technology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.