Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A task‐based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites

A task‐based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe research undertaken for the European Internet Accessibility Observatory (EIAO) project. It aims to demonstrate how, using a task‐based approach, statistical measures can be applied to an initial assessment of a web site's accessibility, which could then be applied to further assessments to provide an evolving picture of the ongoing accessibility of a web site. Design/methodology/approach – Task‐based assessments were used to assess the accessibility of web sites, using quantitative and qualitative analysis. The findings from this approach were mapped onto a probabilistic model, developed to assess the probability of an accessibility barrier relating to a specific feature or features of a web site. Findings – The paper finds that providing participants with a task instead of allowing them to randomly explore and evaluate a web site yielded more comparable results. For the EIAO project team, the benefit of the task‐based approach was that it allowed them to compare the user testing results with the results of the automated testing tool developed by the project. From the aggregation models included in the analysis, the most appropriate model and parameters were selected, and adjustments were made according to the comparison outcome. Research limitations/implications – Due to resource limitations and efficiency requirements, the assessments undertaken were limited to automatic evaluation, which could also be tested by the users. Therefore not all accessibility barriers in a web site could be identified. Despite this, it is felt that the outcome of the automatic analysis can be utilised as indicator for the overall accessibility of the web site. Originality/value – This paper provides a framework for web designers, commissioners, and policy makers to undertake a user focussed assessment of the accessibility of their web sites, which could be used in conjunction with other assessment methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Performance Measurement and Metrics Emerald Publishing

A task‐based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites

Jenny Craven; Annika Nietzio
Performance Measurement and Metrics , Volume 8 (2): 12 – Jul 10, 2007
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-task-based-approach-to-assessing-the-accessibility-of-web-sites-y0JR6OUd0T
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1467-8047
DOI
10.1108/14678040710760603
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe research undertaken for the European Internet Accessibility Observatory (EIAO) project. It aims to demonstrate how, using a task‐based approach, statistical measures can be applied to an initial assessment of a web site's accessibility, which could then be applied to further assessments to provide an evolving picture of the ongoing accessibility of a web site. Design/methodology/approach – Task‐based assessments were used to assess the accessibility of web sites, using quantitative and qualitative analysis. The findings from this approach were mapped onto a probabilistic model, developed to assess the probability of an accessibility barrier relating to a specific feature or features of a web site. Findings – The paper finds that providing participants with a task instead of allowing them to randomly explore and evaluate a web site yielded more comparable results. For the EIAO project team, the benefit of the task‐based approach was that it allowed them to compare the user testing results with the results of the automated testing tool developed by the project. From the aggregation models included in the analysis, the most appropriate model and parameters were selected, and adjustments were made according to the comparison outcome. Research limitations/implications – Due to resource limitations and efficiency requirements, the assessments undertaken were limited to automatic evaluation, which could also be tested by the users. Therefore not all accessibility barriers in a web site could be identified. Despite this, it is felt that the outcome of the automatic analysis can be utilised as indicator for the overall accessibility of the web site. Originality/value – This paper provides a framework for web designers, commissioners, and policy makers to undertake a user focussed assessment of the accessibility of their web sites, which could be used in conjunction with other assessment methods.

Journal

Performance Measurement and Metrics – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 10, 2007

Keywords: Internet; Task analysis; Statistical methods

References

  • Top Airlines Losing Millions by Barring Disabled People from Web Sites
    AbilityNet
  • Towards user‐centred, scenario‐based planning and evaluation tools
    Bohman, P.; Anderson, S.
  • The development of a method for the evaluation of interface information retrieval systems
    Borlund, P.; Ingwersen, P.
  • Interpreting results from large scale automatic evaluation of web accessibility
    Bühler, C.
  • eAccessibility of Public Sector Services in the European Union
    Cabinet Office
  • Access to electronic resources by visually impaired people
    Craven, J.
  • eEurope 2002: An Information Society for All
    European Commission
  • eEurope 2005: An Information Society for All
    European Commission
  • i2010 – A European Information Society for Growth and Employment
    European Commission
  • Managing usability for people with disabilities in a large web presence
    King, M.
  • Usability of the academic library web site: implications for design
    McGillis, L.; Toms, E.G.
  • Remote Usability Evaluations with Disabled People
    Petrie, H.; Hamilton, F.; King, N.; Pavan, P.
  • Web2.0: Supporting Library Users
    UKOLN
  • Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM1.0)
    Web Accessibility Benchmarking Cluster
  • Web accessibility revealed: the museums libraries and archives council audit
    Weisen, M.
  • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation
    World Wide Web Consortium