Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A survey of the design methods for additive manufacturing to improve functional performance

A survey of the design methods for additive manufacturing to improve functional performance PurposeThis paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the state-of–the-art design methods for additive manufacturing (AM) technologies to improve functional performance.Design/methodology/approachIn this survey, design methods for AM to improve functional performance are divided into two main groups. They are design methods for a specific objective and general design methods. Design methods in the first group primarily focus on the improvement of functional performance, while the second group also takes other important factors such as manufacturability and cost into consideration with a more general framework. Design methods in each groups are carefully reviewed with discussion and comparison.FindingsThe advantages and disadvantages of different design methods for AM are discussed in this paper. Some general issues of existing methods are summarized below: most existing design methods only focus on a single design scale with a single function; few product-level design methods are available for both products’ functionality and assembly; and some existing design methods are hard to implement for the lack of suitable computer-aided design software.Practical implicationsThis study is a useful source for designers to select an appropriate design method to take full advantage of AM.Originality/valueIn this survey, a novel classification method is used to categorize existing design methods for AM. Based on this classification method, a comprehensive review is provided in this paper as an informative source for designers and researchers working in this field. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Rapid Prototyping Journal Emerald Publishing

A survey of the design methods for additive manufacturing to improve functional performance

Rapid Prototyping Journal , Volume 22 (3): 22 – Apr 18, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-survey-of-the-design-methods-for-additive-manufacturing-to-improve-iub1sO6AvT
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1355-2546
DOI
10.1108/RPJ-01-2015-0011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the state-of–the-art design methods for additive manufacturing (AM) technologies to improve functional performance.Design/methodology/approachIn this survey, design methods for AM to improve functional performance are divided into two main groups. They are design methods for a specific objective and general design methods. Design methods in the first group primarily focus on the improvement of functional performance, while the second group also takes other important factors such as manufacturability and cost into consideration with a more general framework. Design methods in each groups are carefully reviewed with discussion and comparison.FindingsThe advantages and disadvantages of different design methods for AM are discussed in this paper. Some general issues of existing methods are summarized below: most existing design methods only focus on a single design scale with a single function; few product-level design methods are available for both products’ functionality and assembly; and some existing design methods are hard to implement for the lack of suitable computer-aided design software.Practical implicationsThis study is a useful source for designers to select an appropriate design method to take full advantage of AM.Originality/valueIn this survey, a novel classification method is used to categorize existing design methods for AM. Based on this classification method, a comprehensive review is provided in this paper as an informative source for designers and researchers working in this field.

Journal

Rapid Prototyping JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Apr 18, 2016

There are no references for this article.