Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Sheehan (2006)
Want to improve strategic execution? Simons says leversJournal of Business Strategy, 27
E. Ziegel, R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1998)
The Balanced ScorecardTechnometrics, 40
(2008)
The five competitive forces that shape strategy.
N. Sheehan (2009)
Making risk pay: the board's roleJournal of Business Strategy, 30
J. Heskett, W. Sasser, J. Wheeler (2008)
Ownership Quotient: Putting the Service Profit Chain to Work for Unbeatable Competitive Advantage
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (2000)
The strategy-focused organizationStrategy & Leadership, 29
R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton
Strategy Maps
R.S. Kaplan, D.P. Norton
The Execution Premium
Robert Simons (1999)
Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases
J. Kersnar
Warning signs: why risk management is letting down companies and what to do about it
R. Simons
Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy
S. Berinato
Risk's rewards: are you on board with enterprise risk management? You had better be its the future of how businesses will be run
COSO
Enterprise Risk Management — Integrated Framework: Executive Summary
Purpose – This article integrates strategy mapping, risk management and management control into a risk‐based approach to strategy execution. It uses strategy mapping as a tool to visually depict the firm's strategy and then assess its risks. Based on this risk assessment, the firm's management control system is designed to manage those risks which are seen to have the greatest probability to negatively impact firm profitability. The proposed framework can be used on a stand‐alone basis or be used to complement Kaplan and Norton's work on strategy mapping. Design/methodology/approach – This article draws from the confluence of the risk management, management control, and strategy mapping literatures to illustrate how firms can improve their handling of risk. Findings – Strategy mapping is an effective tool to identify risks, while Simons' Levers of Control provides an effective alternative to manage the risks identified. Practical implications – A firm's future profitability depends on its ability to identify and manage risk. Given that firms only profit when they successfully manage risk, the design and application of its management control system must flow from an assessment of the risks assumed in its strategy. The primary advantage of an integrated risk‐based management control system is that it allows managers, in real time, to steer the firm towards the good things that were outlined in its strategy and away from any bad things. Originality/value – The article extends Kaplan and Norton's work by proposing strategy mapping as a tool to identify and then to help manage risks.
Journal of Business Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 7, 2010
Keywords: Strategic management; Risk management; Risk assessment; Strategic planning; Performance management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.