Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A review and recommendations for the integration of forensic expertise within police cold case reviews

A review and recommendations for the integration of forensic expertise within police cold case... Cold case review teams and the processes that they adopt in their endeavour to solve historic crimes are varied and largely underreported. Of the limited literature surrounding the topic of cold case reviews, the focus is on clearance rates and the selection of cases for review. While multiple reports and reviews have been undertaken and recommend that the interface between investigators and forensic scientists be improved, there is little evidence of cold case teams comprised of a mixture of investigators and scientists or experts. With the growing reliance on forensic science as an aide to solvability, the authors propose that the inclusion of forensic scientists to the central cold case investigation may be a critical factor in future success. The paper aims to discuss this issue.Design/methodology/approachTo support the proposed approach, the authors conducted a review of the current literature seeking insight into the reported make-up of cold case teams. In conjunction with this, the authors reviewed a number of commissioned reports intended to improve cold case reviews and forensic services.FindingsWhile many of the reviewed reports and recommendations suggested better integration with scientists and external expertise, little evidence of this in practice was reported within published literature. Open dialogue and cross pollination between police investigators and forensic scientists are likely to mitigate biases, inform case file triage and better equip investigations with contemporary and cutting-edge scientific solutions to the evidence analysis for cold cases. Furthermore, with respect to scientists within academia, large pools of resources by way of student interns or researchers may be available to assist resource-sparse policing jurisdictions.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed recommendation for the consideration of integrated forensic scientists within a cold case review team. Multiple reports suggest the need for closer ties, but it is the anecdotal experience of the authors that the benefits of a blended task force approach may yield greater success. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Criminal Psychology Emerald Publishing

A review and recommendations for the integration of forensic expertise within police cold case reviews

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-review-and-recommendations-for-the-integration-of-forensic-expertise-7UwPhzTQNO
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2009-3829
DOI
10.1108/jcp-09-2019-0038
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cold case review teams and the processes that they adopt in their endeavour to solve historic crimes are varied and largely underreported. Of the limited literature surrounding the topic of cold case reviews, the focus is on clearance rates and the selection of cases for review. While multiple reports and reviews have been undertaken and recommend that the interface between investigators and forensic scientists be improved, there is little evidence of cold case teams comprised of a mixture of investigators and scientists or experts. With the growing reliance on forensic science as an aide to solvability, the authors propose that the inclusion of forensic scientists to the central cold case investigation may be a critical factor in future success. The paper aims to discuss this issue.Design/methodology/approachTo support the proposed approach, the authors conducted a review of the current literature seeking insight into the reported make-up of cold case teams. In conjunction with this, the authors reviewed a number of commissioned reports intended to improve cold case reviews and forensic services.FindingsWhile many of the reviewed reports and recommendations suggested better integration with scientists and external expertise, little evidence of this in practice was reported within published literature. Open dialogue and cross pollination between police investigators and forensic scientists are likely to mitigate biases, inform case file triage and better equip investigations with contemporary and cutting-edge scientific solutions to the evidence analysis for cold cases. Furthermore, with respect to scientists within academia, large pools of resources by way of student interns or researchers may be available to assist resource-sparse policing jurisdictions.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed recommendation for the consideration of integrated forensic scientists within a cold case review team. Multiple reports suggest the need for closer ties, but it is the anecdotal experience of the authors that the benefits of a blended task force approach may yield greater success.

Journal

Journal of Criminal Psychology – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 5, 2020

Keywords: Collaboration; Expertise; Forensic science; Cold case review; Cold case team; Solvability

References

  • Motivations, money and modern policing: accounting for cold case reviews in an age of austerity
    Allsop, C.
  • The effect of experience and complexity on order and recency bias in decision making by professional accountants
    Arnold, V.; Collier, P.A.; Leech, S.A.; Sutton, S.G.
  • Spot the difference: comparing current and historic homicide investigations in the UK
    Atkin, H.; Roach, J.
  • Teaching to avoid the ‘CSI effect’. Keeping the science in forensic science
    Bergslien, E.
  • To analyse a trace or not? Evaluating the decision-making process in the criminal investigation
    Bitzer, S.; Ribaux, O.; Albertini, N.; Delémont, O.
  • Utility of the clue – from assessing the investigative contribution of forensic science to supporting the decision to use traces
    Bitzer, S.; Albertini, N.; Lock, E.; Ribaux, O.; Delémont, O.
  • Characterizing criminal careers
    Blumstein, A.; Cohen, J.
  • Cognitive bias research in forensic science: a systematic review
    Cooper, G.S.; Meterko, V.
  • Working smarter on cold cases: identifying factors associated with successful cold case investigations
    Davis, R.C.; Jensen, C.J.; Burgette, L.; Burnett, K.
  • The scientification of police work
    Ericson, R.; Shearing, C.
  • Alive and well after 25 years: a review of groupthink research
    Esser, J.K.
  • The pursuit of police integrity: leadership and governance dimensions
    Goldsmith, A.
  • The CSI effect
    Hyland, D.
  • The landscape of forensic intelligence research
    Legrand, T.; Vogel, L.
  • A longitudinal study of escalation in crime seriousness
    Liu, J.; Francis, B.; Soothill, K.
  • Implementing a cold case homicide unit: a challenging task
    Lord, V.B.
  • The DNA expansion programme and criminal investigation
    Mccartney, C.
  • Behind the evidence: forensic services
    Pearson, D.D.R.
  • Clearing murders: is it about time?
    Regoeczi, W.C.; Jarvis, J.; Riedel, M.
  • Cold case investigation units
    Reyes, N.C.
  • Cognitive and emotional stressors of child homicide investigations on U.K. and Danish police investigators
    Roach, J.; Sharratt, K.; Cartwright, A.; Skou Roer, T.
  • Cold cases: strategies explored at NIJ regional trainings
    Schuster, B.
  • Pro-innovation bias: the case of the giant Texas smokescream
    Smith, D.W.; Zhang, J.J.; Colwell, B.
  • Cold case investigation in educational settings in Germany
    Stuppericha, A.; Bettelsa, K.; Marquardtb, A.
  • The weighting game: exploring factors impacting detective’s prioritization of cold case homicides
    Wellman, A.